+1 Recommend
1 collections
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Color Doppler Mapping of Aortic Regurgitation in Aortic Stenosis: Comparison with Angiography

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.


          Color flow Doppler mapping has become the principal noninvasive method used for the qualitative grading of aortic regurgitation (AR). However, the performance of the color Doppler method in patients with AR accompanying aortic stenosis (AS) has not been studied. We therefore compared results of color Doppler and semiquantitative angiographic grading of AR in 32 patients with AS (mean valve area = 0.7 cm<sup>2</sup>) undergoing supravalvular aortography in the course of cardiac catheterization. Color Doppler demonstrated AR in all 27 patients who had AR by aortography. As expected, neither the maximal jet area nor the jet length discriminated patients by angiographic grade. The best correlation between color Doppler and aortography occurred when the ratio of maximal jet height (JH) to left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) height was used to grade AR on a scale of 0-4. Four of 5 patients without AR by aortography had either absent or grade 1 AR by color Doppler. Although there was considerable overlap of color Doppler grades in patients with 1+ AR by aortography, grade 3 or 4 AR by color Doppler was always associated with III+ or IV+ AR by aortography. Thus, color Doppler sensitively depicts AR in patients with AS, and the ratio of JH to LVOT height by color Doppler correctly identifies patients with III+ or IV+ AR by aortography. Methods for distinguishing among milder grades require further evaluation.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          S. Karger AG
          14 November 2008
          : 81
          : 4-5
          : 251-257
          Division of Cardiology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Mass., USA
          175812 Cardiology 1992;81:251–257
          © 1992 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          Page count
          Pages: 7
          Diagnostic Cardiology


          Comment on this article