5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Scaling Hemodialysis Target Dose to Reflect Body Surface Area, Metabolic Activity, and Protein Catabolic Rate: A Prospective, Cross-sectional Study

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Simple nutritional indicators as independent predictors of mortality in hemodialysis patients.

          A strong association exists between nutritional status and morbidity and mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease who are treated with hemodialysis. Described here is the predictive value for mortality over 5 years of follow-up of a number of risk factors, recorded at baseline, in a national sample of 3,607 hemodialysis patients. Among the variables studied were case-mix covariates, caregiver classifications of nutritional status, serum albumin concentration, and body mass index (BMI). The Case Mix Adequacy special study of the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) provided these measurements as of December 31, 1990. The USRDS patient standard analysis file provided follow-up data on mortality for all patients through December 31, 1995, by which time 64.7% of the patients had died. BMI is a simple anthropometric measurement that has received little attention in dialysis practice. Caregiver classification refers to documentation in a patient's dialysis facility medical records that stated an individual to be "undernourished/cachectic," "obese/overweight," or "well-nourished." The mean serum albumin was 3.7 +/- 0.45 (SD) g/dL, and the mean BMI was 24.4 +/- 5.3 (SD) kg/m2. By caregiver classification, 20.1% of patients were undernourished, and 24.9% obese. In hazard regression models, including but not limited to the Cox proportional hazards model, low BMI, low serum albumin, and the caregiver classification "undernourished" were independently and significantly predictive of increased mortality. In analyses allowing for time-varying relative mortality risks (ie, nonproportional hazards), the greatest predictive value of all three variables occurred early during follow-up, but the independent predictive value of baseline serum albumin and BMI measurements on mortality risk persisted even 5 years later. No evidence of increasing mortality risk was found for higher values of BMI. Serum albumin was confirmed to be a useful predictor of mortality risk in hemodialysis patients; BMI was established as an independently important predictor of mortality; both serum albumin and BMI, measured at baseline, continue to possess predictive value 5 years later; the subjective caregiver classification of nutritional status "undernourished" has independent value in predicting mortality risk beyond the information gained from two other markers of nutritional status--BMI and serum albumin.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Body mass index and mortality in 'healthier' as compared with 'sicker' haemodialysis patients: results from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS).

            Haemodialysis (HD) patients with lower body mass index (BMI) have a higher relative mortality risk (RR), irrespective of race. However, only Asian Americans treated with HD have been found to have an elevated RR with higher BMI. Asian Americans on HD are 'healthier' than other race groups (i.e. have better overall survival). We hypothesized that an increased mortality risk might be associated with high BMI in a variety of other 'healthier' subgroups of HD patients. The prospective Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) provided baseline demographic, comorbidity and BMI data on 9714 HD patients in the US and Europe (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK) from 1996-2000. Using multivariate survival analyses, we evaluated BMI-mortality relationships in HD subpopulations defined by continent, race (black and white), gender, tertiles of severity of illness (based on a score derived from comorbid conditions and serum albumin concentration), age ( or=65), smoking, and diabetic status. Relative mortality risk decreased with increasing BMI. This was statistically significant (P<0.007) except for the smallest subgroup of patients who were <45 years old and were also in the healthiest tertile of comorbidity. All else equal, BMI <20 was consistently associated with the highest relative mortality risk. Overall a lower relative mortality risk (RR) as compared with BMI 23-24.9, was found for overweight (BMI 25-29.9; RR 0.84, P=0.008), for mild obesity (BMI 30-34.9; RR 0.73, P=0.0003), and for moderate obesity (BMI 35-39.9; RR 0.76, P=0.02). In a wide variety of HD patient subgroups, differing with respect to their baseline health status, increasing body size correlates with a decreased mortality risk. This contrasts with the association between BMI and mortality in the general population, and deserves further study.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Dialysis dose and the effect of gender and body size on outcome in the HEMO Study.

              Gender and body size have been associated with survival in hemodialysis populations. In recent observational studies, overall mortality was similar in men and women and higher in small patients. The effect of dialysis dose in each of these subgroups has not been tested in a clinical trial. The HEMO Study was a controlled trial of dialysis dose and membrane flux in 1846 hemodialysis patients followed up for 6.6 years in 15 centers throughout the United States. We examined the effect of dialysis dose on mortality and on selected secondary outcomes in subgroups of patients. Adjusting for age only, overall mortality was lower in patients with higher body weight (P < 0.001), higher body mass index (P < 0.001), and higher body water content determined by the Watson formula (Vw) (P < 0.001), but was not associated with gender (P= 0.27). The RR of mortality comparing the high dose with the standard dose group was related to gender (P= 0.014). Women randomized to the high dose had a lower mortality rate than women randomized to the standard dose (RR = 0.81, P= 0.02), while men randomized to the high dose had a nonsignificant trend for a higher mortality rate than men randomized to the standard dose (RR = 1.16, P= 0.16). Analysis of both genders combined showed no overall dose effect (R = 0.96, P= 0.52), as reported previously. Vw was greater than 35 L in 84% of men compared with 17% of women. However, the RR of mortality for the high versus standard dose remained lower in women than in men after adjustment for the interaction of dose with Vw or with other size parameters, including weight and body mass index. Conversely, the dose effect was not significantly related to size parameters after controlling for the relationship of the dose comparison with gender. The data suggest that mortality and morbidity might be reduced by increasing the dialysis dose above the current standard in women but not in men. This effect was not explained by differences between men and women in age, race, or in several indices of body size. Because multiple comparisons were considered in this analysis, the role of gender on the effect of dialysis dose is suggestive and invites further study.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                American Journal of Kidney Diseases
                American Journal of Kidney Diseases
                Elsevier BV
                02726386
                March 2017
                March 2017
                : 69
                : 3
                : 358-366
                Article
                10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.07.025
                27663037
                8ca5692e-e98c-4f11-82ab-d659801befca
                © 2017
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article