2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluating the Management of chronic Pelvic girdle Pain following pregnancy (EMaPP): study protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial to compare a customised pelvic orthosis with standard care

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          An estimated 10% of women experience severe, chronic pelvic girdle pain post partum. This has significant physical, psychological and socioeconomic consequences. Typically, such pain is recalcitrant to conservative management; hence the need to identify effective management strategies. Customised Dynamic Elastomeric Fabric Orthoses may be an option to address this gap; designed to improve pain by providing support while optimising movement and function. Currently, no studies have evaluated the clinical and cost-effectiveness, or acceptability of these customised orthoses in postpartum women.

          Methods and analysis

          EMaPP is a pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled feasibility trial with an embedded qualitative study and economic evaluation. Sixty participants with pregnancy-related severe pelvic girdle pain >3 months post partum will be recruited. Participants will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio (stratified by centre and presence/absence of lumbo-pelvic pain pre pregnancy) to receive either standard care (standardised information and exercise) or intervention (orthosis plus standard care). All participants will be asked to complete a battery of self-report questionnaires (including pain, function, health-related quality of life and health and social care resource use), via a web-based application at baseline, 12 weeks and 24 weeks. Pain levels and medication usage will be reported fortnightly. Feasibility and acceptability of the trial procedures will be determined in terms of recruitment and retention rates, data completion rates and intervention adherence. Five clinicians and 10 participants will be interviewed to explore their experiences of the trial procedures and receiving the intervention.

          Ethics and dissemination

          This study was approved by: National Research Ethics Scheme (NRES Committee Health and Care Research Wales Research Ethics Committee (21/WM/0155) and University of Plymouth Faculty of Health Research Ethics and Integrity Committee (ref:2966). Results will be made available to participants, the funders, staff, general public and other researchers through a range of mechanisms.

          Trial status

          Currently recruiting.

          Trial registration number

          ISRCTN67232113.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide

          Without a complete published description of interventions, clinicians and patients cannot reliably implement interventions that are shown to be useful, and other researchers cannot replicate or build on research findings. The quality of description of interventions in publications, however, is remarkably poor. To improve the completeness of reporting, and ultimately the replicability, of interventions, an international group of experts and stakeholders developed the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. The process involved a literature review for relevant checklists and research, a Delphi survey of an international panel of experts to guide item selection, and a face to face panel meeting. The resultant 12 item TIDieR checklist (brief name, why, what (materials), what (procedure), who provided, how, where, when and how much, tailoring, modifications, how well (planned), how well (actual)) is an extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement (item 5) and the SPIRIT 2013 statement (item 11). While the emphasis of the checklist is on trials, the guidance is intended to apply across all evaluative study designs. This paper presents the TIDieR checklist and guide, with an explanation and elaboration for each item, and examples of good reporting. The TIDieR checklist and guide should improve the reporting of interventions and make it easier for authors to structure accounts of their interventions, reviewers and editors to assess the descriptions, and readers to use the information.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials.

            The protocol of a clinical trial serves as the foundation for study planning, conduct, reporting, and appraisal. However, trial protocols and existing protocol guidelines vary greatly in content and quality. This article describes the systematic development and scope of SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) 2013, a guideline for the minimum content of a clinical trial protocol.The 33-item SPIRIT checklist applies to protocols for all clinical trials and focuses on content rather than format. The checklist recommends a full description of what is planned; it does not prescribe how to design or conduct a trial. By providing guidance for key content, the SPIRIT recommendations aim to facilitate the drafting of high-quality protocols. Adherence to SPIRIT would also enhance the transparency and completeness of trial protocols for the benefit of investigators, trial participants, patients, sponsors, funders, research ethics committees or institutional review boards, peer reviewers, journals, trial registries, policymakers, regulators, and other key stakeholders.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2022
                4 August 2022
                4 August 2022
                : 12
                : 8
                : e063767
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentFaculty of Health , University of Plymouth , Plymouth, UK
                [2 ]departmentSpinal Trauma & Orthopaedics , Aneurin Bevan Health Board , Newport, UK
                [3 ]departmentPeninsula Clinical Trials Unit , University of Plymouth , Plymouth, UK
                [4 ]departmentClinical School , Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust , Truro, UK
                [5 ]departmentHealth Economics Group , University of Exeter , Exeter, UK
                [6 ]Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust , Bodmin, UK
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Bradley John Halliday; bradley.halliday@ 123456plymouth.ac.uk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1296-108X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6529-4893
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1406-8500
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7090-0205
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2766-7302
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1336-5899
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2666-5073
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4072-9758
                Article
                bmjopen-2022-063767
                10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063767
                9361753
                8cb07ad3-a267-413c-b9d9-68e47ca63241
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See:  https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 11 April 2022
                : 01 June 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Research for Patient Benefit Programme;
                Award ID: NIHR201930
                Funded by: NIHR;
                Award ID: NIHR201930
                Categories
                Rehabilitation Medicine
                1506
                1727
                Protocol
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                rehabilitation medicine,pain management,musculoskeletal disorders
                Medicine
                rehabilitation medicine, pain management, musculoskeletal disorders

                Comments

                Comment on this article