Los grandes paradigmas de la educación médica en Latinoamérica <span class="so-article-trans-title" dir="auto"> Translated title: The big paradigms of the medical education in latin american countries </span>

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

La educación médica ha sido y será un tema de preocupación para todas las generaciones en cualquier parte del mundo ya que de ello depende en parte el progreso de las sociedades y de nuestra profesión, necesaria en el Estado. En este artículo trataré de realizar un recuento histórico de los procesos que se han llevado a cabo en la educación médica en el mundo y en especial en los países de América Latina, tomando como puntos de referencia los dos paradigmas más importantes hasta el momento como son el paradigma "flexneriano" y el paradigma "crítico". También enuncio los inconvenientes y algunas reformas educacionales que ha tenido que pasar la mayoría de las naciones frente a la adversidad del contexto socioeconómico que los rodea. Además de ello hago un esbozo de un tercer paradigma en gestación generado por la introducción de un nuevo personaje en la educación médica: la tecnología.

Translated abstract

The medical education has been and will continue to be a subject of concern to all generations anywhere in the world because it depends in part on the progress of societies and our profession; so necessary in the state. The objective of this article is to try to conduct a historical review of the processes that have taken place in medical education in the world and especially in Latin America; taking as a benchmark the two paradigms most important so far as the "Flexner" paradigm and the "critical" paradigm. I’ll also try to show the disadvantages and some educational reforms that most of the nations have faced, related to adversity in the socio-economic context that surrounds them. Besides that, I make an outline of a third emerging paradigm generated by the introduction of a new character in medical education: Technology.

Related collections

Most cited references 94

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

The psychological basis of problem-based learning: a review of the evidence.

G R Norman, H G Schmidt (1992)

Several potential advantages for students' learning are claimed for problem-based learning (PBL). Students in PBL curricula may be more highly motivated; they may be better problem solvers and self-directed learners; they may be better able to learn and recall information; and they may be better able to integrate basic science knowledge into the solutions of clinical problems. Although some of these claims find theoretical support from the literature on the psychology of learning, to date there has been no review of the experimental evidence supporting the possible differences in students' learning that can be attributed to PBL. In this review article, the authors examine each claim critically in light of that evidence. They conclude that (1) there is no evidence that PBL curricula result in any improvement in general, content-free problem-solving skills; (2) learning in a PBL format may initially reduce levels of learning but may foster, over periods up to several years, increased retention of knowledge; (3) some preliminary evidence suggests that PBL curricula may enhance both transfer of concepts to new problems and integration of basic science concepts into clinical problems; (4) PBL enhances intrinsic interest in the subject matter; and (5) PBL appears to enhance self-directed learning skills, and this enhancement may be maintained.