117
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Timing is not Everything: Neuromodulation Opens the STDP Gate

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Spike timing dependent plasticity (STDP) is a temporally specific extension of Hebbian associative plasticity that has tied together the timing of presynaptic inputs relative to the postsynaptic single spike. However, it is difficult to translate this mechanism to in vivo conditions where there is an abundance of presynaptic activity constantly impinging upon the dendritic tree as well as ongoing postsynaptic spiking activity that backpropagates along the dendrite. Theoretical studies have proposed that, in addition to this pre- and postsynaptic activity, a “third factor” would enable the association of specific inputs to specific outputs. Experimentally, the picture that is beginning to emerge, is that in addition to the precise timing of pre- and postsynaptic spikes, this third factor involves neuromodulators that have a distinctive influence on STDP rules. Specifically, neuromodulatory systems can influence STDP rules by acting via dopaminergic, noradrenergic, muscarinic, and nicotinic receptors. Neuromodulator actions can enable STDP induction or – by increasing or decreasing the threshold – can change the conditions for plasticity induction. Because some of the neuromodulators are also involved in reward, a link between STDP and reward-mediated learning is emerging. However, many outstanding questions concerning the relationship between neuromodulatory systems and STDP rules remain, that once solved, will help make the crucial link from timing-based synaptic plasticity rules to behaviorally based learning.

          Related collections

          Most cited references141

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Regulation of synaptic efficacy by coincidence of postsynaptic APs and EPSPs.

          Activity-driven modifications in synaptic connections between neurons in the neocortex may occur during development and learning. In dual whole-cell voltage recordings from pyramidal neurons, the coincidence of postsynaptic action potentials (APs) and unitary excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) was found to induce changes in EPSPs. Their average amplitudes were differentially up- or down-regulated, depending on the precise timing of postsynaptic APs relative to EPSPs. These observations suggest that APs propagating back into dendrites serve to modify single active synaptic connections, depending on the pattern of electrical activity in the pre- and postsynaptic neurons.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Synaptic modifications in cultured hippocampal neurons: dependence on spike timing, synaptic strength, and postsynaptic cell type.

            Q Bi, G Bi, M Poo (1998)
            In cultures of dissociated rat hippocampal neurons, persistent potentiation and depression of glutamatergic synapses were induced by correlated spiking of presynaptic and postsynaptic neurons. The relative timing between the presynaptic and postsynaptic spiking determined the direction and the extent of synaptic changes. Repetitive postsynaptic spiking within a time window of 20 msec after presynaptic activation resulted in long-term potentiation (LTP), whereas postsynaptic spiking within a window of 20 msec before the repetitive presynaptic activation led to long-term depression (LTD). Significant LTP occurred only at synapses with relatively low initial strength, whereas the extent of LTD did not show obvious dependence on the initial synaptic strength. Both LTP and LTD depended on the activation of NMDA receptors and were absent in cases in which the postsynaptic neurons were GABAergic in nature. Blockade of L-type calcium channels with nimodipine abolished the induction of LTD and reduced the extent of LTP. These results underscore the importance of precise spike timing, synaptic strength, and postsynaptic cell type in the activity-induced modification of central synapses and suggest that Hebb's rule may need to incorporate a quantitative consideration of spike timing that reflects the narrow and asymmetric window for the induction of synaptic modification.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Getting formal with dopamine and reward.

              Recent neurophysiological studies reveal that neurons in certain brain structures carry specific signals about past and future rewards. Dopamine neurons display a short-latency, phasic reward signal indicating the difference between actual and predicted rewards. The signal is useful for enhancing neuronal processing and learning behavioral reactions. It is distinctly different from dopamine's tonic enabling of numerous behavioral processes. Neurons in the striatum, frontal cortex, and amygdala also process reward information but provide more differentiated information for identifying and anticipating rewards and organizing goal-directed behavior. The different reward signals have complementary functions, and the optimal use of rewards in voluntary behavior would benefit from interactions between the signals. Addictive psychostimulant drugs may exert their action by amplifying the dopamine reward signal.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Front Synaptic Neurosci
                Front. Syn. Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience
                Frontiers Research Foundation
                1663-3563
                25 October 2010
                2010
                : 2
                : 146
                Affiliations
                [1] 1simpleNetwork Imaging Group, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics Tuebingen, Germany
                [2] 2simpleNeurobiology Research Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Okinawa, Japan
                [3] 3simpleMind/Brain Institute and Department of Neurosciences, Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD, USA
                Author notes

                Edited by: Wulfram Gerstner, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland

                Reviewed by: Markus Diesmann, RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Japan; Wulfram Gerstner, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland; Henning Sprekeler, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland; Nicolas Fremaux, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland; Botond Szatmáry, Brain Corporation, USA

                *Correspondence: Verena Pawlak and Jason N. D. Kerr, Network Imaging Group, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Spemannstrasse 41, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany. e-mail: verena.pawlaktuebingen.mpg.de; jason@ 123456tuebingen.mpg.de
                Article
                10.3389/fnsyn.2010.00146
                3059689
                21423532
                8cd588b8-4229-4ca0-b90e-110f8a300162
                Copyright © 2010 Pawlak, Wickens, Kirkwood and Kerr.

                This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.

                History
                : 15 April 2010
                : 27 September 2010
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 175, Pages: 14, Words: 13576
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Review Article

                Neurosciences
                behavior,noradrenaline,reward,learning,dopamine,calcium,acetylcholine,synaptic plasticity
                Neurosciences
                behavior, noradrenaline, reward, learning, dopamine, calcium, acetylcholine, synaptic plasticity

                Comments

                Comment on this article