12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Serum Creatinine in Patients Undergoing Partial Nephrectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Renal function declines after partial nephrectomy due to ischemic reperfusion injury induced by surgical insult or renal artery clamping. The effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on reducing renal injury after partial nephrectomy has not been studied regarding urinary biomarkers. Eighty-one patients undergoing partial nephrectomy were randomly assigned to either RIPC or the control group. RIPC protocol consisted of four cycles of five-min inflation and deflation of a blood pressure cuff to 250 mmHg. Serum creatinine levels were compared at the following time points: preoperative baseline, immediate postoperative, on the first and third days after surgery, and two weeks after surgery. The incidence of acute kidney injury, other surgical complication rates, and urinary biomarkers, including urine creatinine, β-2 microglobulin, microalbumin, and N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase were compared. Split renal functions measured by renal scan were compared up to 18 months after surgery. There was no significant difference in the serum creatinine level on the first postoperative day (median (interquartile range) 0.87 mg/dL (0.72–1.03) in the RIPC group vs. 0.92 mg/dL (0.71–1.12) in the control group, p = 0.728), nor at any other time point. There was no significant difference in the incidence of acute kidney injury. Secondary outcomes, including urinary biomarkers, were not significantly different between the groups. RIPC showed no significant effect on the postoperative serum creatinine level of the first postoperative day. We could not reveal any significant difference in the urinary biomarkers and clinical outcomes. However, further larger randomized trials are required, because our study was not sufficiently powered for the secondary outcomes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          KDIGO Clinical Practice Guidelines for Acute Kidney Injury

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate.

            Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimates facilitate detection of chronic kidney disease but require calibration of the serum creatinine assay to the laboratory that developed the equation. The 4-variable equation from the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study has been reexpressed for use with a standardized assay. To describe the performance of the revised 4-variable MDRD Study equation and compare it with the performance of the 6-variable MDRD Study and Cockcroft-Gault equations. Comparison of estimated and measured GFR. 15 clinical centers participating in a randomized, controlled trial. 1628 patients with chronic kidney disease participating in the MDRD Study. Serum creatinine levels were calibrated to an assay traceable to isotope-dilution mass spectrometry. Glomerular filtration rate was measured as urinary clearance of 125I-iothalamate. Mean measured GFR was 39.8 mL/min per 1.73 m2 (SD, 21.2). Accuracy and precision of the revised 4-variable equation were similar to those of the original 6-variable equation and better than in the Cockcroft-Gault equation, even when the latter was corrected for bias, with 90%, 91%, 60%, and 83% of estimates within 30% of measured GFR, respectively. Differences between measured and estimated GFR were greater for all equations when the estimated GFR was 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 or greater. The MDRD Study included few patients with a GFR greater than 90 mL/min per 1.73 m2. Equations were not compared in a separate study sample. The 4-variable MDRD Study equation provides reasonably accurate GFR estimates in patients with chronic kidney disease and a measured GFR of less than 90 mL/min per 1.73 m2. By using the reexpressed MDRD Study equation with the standardized serum creatinine assay, clinical laboratories can report more accurate GFR estimates.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Acute kidney disease and renal recovery: consensus report of the Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) 16 Workgroup

              Acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease are increasingly recognized as interconnected entities and the term acute kidney disease (AKD) has been proposed to define ongoing pathophysiologic processes following an episode of AKI. In this Consensus statement, the Acute Disease Quality Initiative 16 Workgroup propose definitions and staging criteria for AKD, and strategies for the management of affected patients. They also make recommendations for areas of future research with the aims of improving understanding of the underlying processes and improving outcomes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                J Clin Med
                J Clin Med
                jcm
                Journal of Clinical Medicine
                MDPI
                2077-0383
                12 April 2021
                April 2021
                : 10
                : 8
                : 1636
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, 101 Daehak-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul 03080, Korea; jychung1991@ 123456gmail.com (J.C.); bdbd7799@ 123456gmail.com (H.C.); baejy88@ 123456gmail.com (J.B.); hyunkyu18@ 123456gmail.com (H.-K.Y.); zenerdiode03@ 123456gmail.com (H.-J.L.); yhhh1130@ 123456naver.com (Y.H.J.); mingming7@ 123456gmail.com (Y.J.C.)
                [2 ]Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Ajou University, Suwon 16499, Korea; nuage1220@ 123456gmail.com
                [3 ]Department of Urology, National University Hospital, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, 101 Daehak-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul 03080, Korea; kukuro70@ 123456snu.ac.kr
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: wonhokim@ 123456snu.ac.kr
                [†]

                These two authors contributed equally as co-first authors.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8936-9220
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5424-3559
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7134-5044
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2452-7432
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6478-8616
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1748-1296
                Article
                jcm-10-01636
                10.3390/jcm10081636
                8069991
                33921503
                8ce42ab8-c238-491f-84fe-a22ae591e423
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 26 February 2021
                : 06 April 2021
                Categories
                Article

                remote ischemic preconditioning,partial nephrectomy,acute kidney injury,urinary biomarker

                Comments

                Comment on this article