9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Potential Trade-Offs between the Sustainable Development Goals in Coastal Bangladesh

      , , , , ,
      Sustainability
      MDPI AG

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Policy: Map the interactions between Sustainable Development Goals.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Hard choices: Making trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human well-being

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Integration: the key to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals

              On 25 September, 2015, world leaders met at the United Nations in New York, where they adopted the Sustainable Development Goals. These 17 goals and 169 targets set out an agenda for sustainable development for all nations that embraces economic growth, social inclusion, and environmental protection. Now, the agenda moves from agreeing the goals to implementing and ultimately achieving them. Across the goals, 42 targets focus on means of implementation, and the final goal, Goal 17, is entirely devoted to means of implementation. However, these implementation targets are largely silent about interlinkages and interdependencies among goals. This leaves open the possibility of perverse outcomes and unrealised synergies. We demonstrate that there must be greater attention on interlinkages in three areas: across sectors (e.g., finance, agriculture, energy, and transport), across societal actors (local authorities, government agencies, private sector, and civil society), and between and among low, medium and high income countries. Drawing on a global sustainability science and practice perspective, we provide seven recommendations to improve these interlinkages at both global and national levels, in relation to the UN’s categories of means of implementation: finance, technology, capacity building, trade, policy coherence, partnerships, and, finally, data, monitoring and accountability. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11625-016-0383-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                SUSTDE
                Sustainability
                Sustainability
                MDPI AG
                2071-1050
                April 2018
                April 08 2018
                : 10
                : 4
                : 1108
                Article
                10.3390/su10041108
                8d13e503-e93d-4d18-8357-4e38105c6623
                © 2018

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article