8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Análisis de las diferencias de calibre entre las venas mamarias internas derecha e izquierda y su relación con múltiples factores en reconstrucción microquirúrgica de mama Translated title: Analysis of caliber differences between right and left internal mammary veins and their relationship to multiple factors in microsurgical breast reconstruction

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Resumen Introducción y objetivo. La congestión venosa es la principal causa de complicación en la reconstrucción microquirúrgica de mama. Entre sus posibles motivos, son de especial interés las características de los vasos receptores. Las venas mamarias internas son la primera opción como venas receptoras. El objetivo del presente estudio es evaluar las posibles diferencias existentes entre las venas mamarias internas izquierda y derecha. Material y método. Estudio observacional en 31 casos de reconstrucción mamaria con colgajo DIEP (deep inferior epigastric perforator flap – colgajo de perforante epigástrica inferior) seleccionando los vasos mamarios internos como vasos receptores para comparar posibles diferencias entre el calibre de las venas mamarias internas derecha e izquierda. Resultados. Fueron estadísticamente signifucativos mostrando un calibre de la vena mamaria interna derecha mayor al de la izquierda. Conclusiones. Nuestro estudio ha encontrado diferencias estadísticamente significativas en el calibre de las venas mamarias internas, presentando mayor tamaño las derechas sin verse modificado este resultado por el empleo de radioterapia previa a la cirugía ni por condiciones propias de la paciente, como su índice de masa corporal o su edad. Nivel de evidencia científica Diagnóstico 5c

          Translated abstract

          Abstract Background and objective. Venous congestion is the main resource of complication in microsurgical breast reconstruction. Among the possible causes of this congestion, the characteristics of the recipient vessels are of special interest. Internal mammary veins are the first choice as recipient vessels. The aim of this study is to evaluate the possible differences between the left and right internal mammary veins. Methods. Observational research conducted on 31 cases of breast reconstruction with DIEP flap (deep inferior epigastric perforator flap), selecting the internal mammary vessels as recipient vessels in order to compare possible differences between the caliber of right and left internal mammary veins. Results. The result were statistically significant, showing a larger caliber of the right internal mammary vein than the left. Conclusions. Our study has found statistically significant differences in the caliber of the internal mammary veins, with the right ones being larger without these results being modified using radio-therapy prior to surgery or by the patients own conditions, such as her body mass index or age. Level of evidence Diagnostic 5c

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Short-term safety outcomes of mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without mesh (iBRA): a multicentre, prospective cohort study

          Summary Background Use of biological or synthetic mesh might improve outcomes of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction—breast reconstruction with implants or expanders at the time of mastectomy—but there is a lack of high-quality evidence to support the safety or effectiveness of the technique. We aimed to establish the short-term safety of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction performed with and without mesh, to inform the feasibility of undertaking a future randomised clinical trial comparing different breast reconstruction techniques. Methods In this prospective, multicentre cohort study, we consecutively recruited women aged 16 years or older who had any type of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction for malignancy or risk reduction, with any technique, at 81 participating breast and plastic surgical units in the UK. Data about patient demographics and operative, oncological, and complication details were collected before and after surgery. Outcomes of interest were implant loss (defined as unplanned removal of the expander or implant), infection requiring treatment with antibiotics or surgery, unplanned return to theatre, and unplanned re-admission to hospital for complications of reconstructive surgery, up to 3 months after reconstruction and assessed by clinical review or patient self-report. Follow-up is complete. The study is registered with the ISRCTN Registry, number ISRCTN37664281. Findings Between Feb 1, 2014, and June 30, 2016, 2108 patients had 2655 mastectomies with immediate implant-based breast reconstruction at 81 units across the UK. 1650 (78%) patients had planned single-stage reconstructions (including 12 patients who had a different technique per breast). 1376 (65%) patients had reconstruction with biological (1133 [54%]) or synthetic (243 [12%]) mesh, 181 (9%) had non-mesh submuscular or subfascial implants, 440 (21%) had dermal sling implants, 42 (2%) had pre-pectoral implants, and 79 (4%) had other or a combination of implants. 3-month outcome data were available for 2081 (99%) patients. Of these patients, 182 (9%, 95% CI 8–10) experienced implant loss, 372 (18%, 16–20) required re-admission to hospital, and 370 (18%, 16–20) required return to theatre for complications within 3 months of their initial surgery. 522 (25%, 95% CI 23–27) patients required treatment for an infection. The rates of all of these complications are higher than those in the National Quality Standards (<5% for re-operation, re-admission, and implant loss, and <10% for infection). Interpretation Complications after immediate implant-based breast reconstruction are higher than recommended by national standards. A randomised clinical trial is needed to establish the optimal approach to immediate implant-based breast reconstruction. Funding National Institute for Health Research, Association of Breast Surgery, and British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A systematic review of morbidity associated with autologous breast reconstruction before and after exposure to radiotherapy: are current practices ideal?

            The specific aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature to assess outcomes data on complications and aesthetic results associated with autologous tissue-based breast reconstruction performed before or after chest wall irradiation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Outcomes of DIEP Flap and Fluorescent Angiography: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

              Breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap can be associated with complications such as fat necrosis. The authors' objective was to assess the safety and efficacy of fluorescent angiography with indocyanine green to reduce fat necrosis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                cpil
                Cirugía Plástica Ibero-Latinoamericana
                Cir. plást. iberolatinoam.
                Sociedad Española de Cirugía Plástica, Reparadora y Estética (SECPRE) (Madrid, Madrid, Spain )
                0376-7892
                1989-2055
                March 2023
                : 49
                : 1
                : 75-79
                Affiliations
                [2] Madrid orgnameUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid Spain
                [5] Madrid orgnameHospital Universitario La Paz España
                [4] Madrid Madrid orgnameUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid Spain
                [1] orgnameHospital Universitario La Paz
                [3] orgnameHospital Universitario La Paz
                Article
                S0376-78922023000100011 S0376-7892(23)04900100011
                10.4321/s0376-78922023000100011
                8d7985d6-bed5-4d3f-b9fe-9fc6c1e5feda

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 12 December 2022
                : 12 February 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 13, Pages: 5
                Product

                SciELO Spain

                Categories
                Reconstructiva

                Reconstrucción mamaria,Colgajo libre,DIEP flap,Colgajo DIEP,Internal mammary vein,Breast reconstruction,Free tissue flaps,Breast cancer,Vena mamaria interna,Cáncer de mama

                Comments

                Comment on this article