6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Can clinical case discussions foster clinical reasoning skills in undergraduate medical education? A randomised controlled trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Fostering clinical reasoning is a mainstay of medical education. Based on the clinicopathological conferences, we propose a case-based peer teaching approach called clinical case discussions (CCDs) to promote the respective skills in medical students. This study compares the effectiveness of different CCD formats with varying degrees of social interaction in fostering clinical reasoning.

          Design, setting, participants

          A single-centre randomised controlled trial with a parallel design was conducted at a German university. Study participants (N=106) were stratified and tested regarding their clinical reasoning skills right after CCD participation and 2 weeks later.

          Intervention

          Participants worked within a live discussion group (Live-CCD), a group watching recordings of the live discussions (Video-CCD) or a group working with printed cases (Paper-Cases). The presentation of case information followed an admission-discussion-summary sequence.

          Primary and secondary outcome measures

          Clinical reasoning skills were measured with a knowledge application test addressing the students’ conceptual, strategic and conditional knowledge. Additionally, subjective learning outcomes were assessed.

          Results

          With respect to learning outcomes, the Live-CCD group displayed the best results, followed by Video-CCD and Paper-Cases, F(2,87)=27.07, p<0.001, partial η 2=0.384. No difference was found between Live-CCD and Video-CCD groups in the delayed post-test; however, both outperformed the Paper-Cases group, F(2,87)=30.91, p<0.001, partial η 2=0.415. Regarding subjective learning outcomes, the Live-CCD received significantly better ratings than the other formats, F(2,85)=13.16, p<0.001, partial η 2=0.236.

          Conclusions

          This study demonstrates that the CCD approach is an effective and sustainable clinical reasoning teaching resource for medical students. Subjective learning outcomes underline the importance of learner (inter)activity in the acquisition of clinical reasoning skills in the context of case-based learning. Higher efficacy of more interactive formats can be attributed to positive effects of collaborative learning. Future research should investigate how the Live-CCD format can further be improved and how video-based CCDs can be enhanced through instructional support.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              How to improve the teaching of clinical reasoning: a narrative review and a proposal.

              The development of clinical reasoning (CR) in students has traditionally been left to clinical rotations, which, however, often offer limited practice and suboptimal supervision. Medical schools begin to address these limitations by organising pre-clinical CR courses. The purpose of this paper is to review the variety of approaches employed in the teaching of CR and to present a proposal to improve these practices.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2019
                6 September 2019
                : 9
                : 9
                : e025973
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Institute for Medical Education, University Hospital of LMU Munich , Munich, Germany
                [2 ] departmentDepartment of Internal Medicine IV , University Hospital of LMU Munich , Munich, Germany
                [3 ] departmentDepartment of Education , University of Passau , Passau, Germany
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Jan M Zottmann; jan.zottmann@ 123456med.uni-muenchen.de

                MW and BL are joint first authors.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2239-797X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3887-1181
                Article
                bmjopen-2018-025973
                10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025973
                6731854
                31494596
                8dcbedfb-9589-48fe-8df5-89b4b1251e8c
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 14 August 2018
                : 11 July 2019
                : 11 July 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research;
                Award ID: 01PL12016
                Funded by: Medical Faculty of LMU Munich;
                Award ID: Intramural grant (Lehre@LMU)
                Categories
                Medical Education and Training
                Original Research
                1506
                1709
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                undergraduate medical education,case-based learning,clinical reasoning,social interaction,medical decision making

                Comments

                Comment on this article