7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Use of Machine Learning to Detect Wildlife Product Promotion and Sales on Twitter

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Social media is an important channel for communication, information dissemination, and social interaction, but also provides opportunities to illicitly sell goods online, including the trade of wildlife products. In this study, we use the Twitter public application programming interface (API) to access Twitter messages in order to detect and classify suspicious wildlife trafficking and sale using an unsupervised machine learning topic model combined with keyword filtering and manual annotation. We choose two prohibited wildlife animals and related products: elephant ivory and pangolin, and collected tweets containing keywords and known code words related to these species. In total, we collected 138,357 tweets filtered for these keywords over a 14-day period and were able to identify 53 tweets from 38 unique users that we suspect promoted the sale of Ivory products, though no pangolin related promoted post were detected in this study. Study results show that machine learning combined with supplement analysis approaches such as those utilized in this study have the potential to detect illegal content without the use of an existing training data set. If developed further, these approaches can help technology companies, conservation groups, and law enforcement officials to expedite the process of identifying illegal online sales and stem supply for the billion-dollar criminal industry of online wildlife trafficking.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Summarizing the Evidence on the International Trade in Illegal Wildlife

            The global trade in illegal wildlife is a multi-billion dollar industry that threatens biodiversity and acts as a potential avenue for invasive species and disease spread. Despite the broad-sweeping implications of illegal wildlife sales, scientists have yet to describe the scope and scale of the trade. Here, we provide the most thorough and current description of the illegal wildlife trade using 12 years of seizure records compiled by TRAFFIC, the wildlife trade monitoring network. These records comprise 967 seizures including massive quantities of ivory, tiger skins, live reptiles, and other endangered wildlife and wildlife products. Most seizures originate in Southeast Asia, a recently identified hotspot for future emerging infectious diseases. To date, regulation and enforcement have been insufficient to effectively control the global trade in illegal wildlife at national and international scales. Effective control will require a multi-pronged approach including community-scale education and empowering local people to value wildlife, coordinated international regulation, and a greater allocation of national resources to on-the-ground enforcement.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Wildlife trafficking in the Internet age

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Big Data
                Front Big Data
                Front. Big Data
                Frontiers in Big Data
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2624-909X
                27 August 2019
                2019
                : 2
                : 28
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Global Health Policy Institute , San Diego, CA, United States
                [2] 2Department of Healthcare Research and Policy, University of California, San Diego–Extension , San Diego, CA, United States
                [3] 3Department of Computational Science, Mathematics and Engineering, University of California, San Diego , San Diego, CA, United States
                [4] 4Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, San Diego , San Diego, CA, United States
                [5] 5Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine , San Diego, CA, United States
                [6] 6Division of Infectious Disease and Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego School of Medicine , San Diego, CA, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Ingmar Weber, Qatar Computing Research Institute, Qatar

                Reviewed by: David L. Roberts, University of Kent, United Kingdom; Muhammad Imran, Qatar Computing Research Institute, Qatar; Tanya Wyatt, Northumbria University, United Kingdom

                *Correspondence: Tim K. Mackey tmackey@ 123456ucsd.edu

                This article was submitted to Data Mining and Management, a section of the journal Frontiers in Big Data

                Article
                10.3389/fdata.2019.00028
                7931875
                33693351
                8dd06b86-c4b8-40d0-b9b2-6eba8108e923
                Copyright © 2019 Xu, Li, Cai and Mackey.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 15 May 2019
                : 30 July 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 0, Equations: 3, References: 26, Pages: 8, Words: 4812
                Categories
                Big Data
                Brief Research Report

                wildlife trafficking,wildlife product sales,social media,twitter,machine learning

                Comments

                Comment on this article