2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      235. If Symptoms Aren’t Described, Antibiotics Aren’t Prescribed: Implementation of a Multifaceted Toolkit Targeting Overtreatment of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria across a Large Health-system

      abstract
      , PharmD 1 , , PharmD 1 , , MD, PharmD 2 , , PharmD 1 , , PhD 3 , , MD 2
      Open Forum Infectious Diseases
      Oxford University Press

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Overtreatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) is a major challenge for antimicrobial stewardship (ASP). A February 2017 review of our health-system showed >50% of inpatients with a positive urine culture (PUC) were treated despite no urinary tract infection (UTI) symptoms or compelling indications (CI) [pregnancy or pending urologic procedure]. In Fall 2017, we piloted a multifaceted toolkit (MTK) to support an ASB educational campaign (EC) at 26 hospitals.

          Methods

          A MTK of flyers, a urinary testing algorithm, and narrated slides (Figure 1) was distributed in Fall 2017 and implementation was customized by each hospital’s ASP. Impact of EC on treatment of patients with no urinary symptoms (NUS) or altered mental status (AMS) alone were assessed retrospectively by sampling inpatient PUCs from February 1–28, 2018 in a manner identical to a pre-EC sample. Patients were excluded if: CI, age <18 years, neutropenic, or admitted on UTI therapy or with nephrolithiasis. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data; UTI symptoms; microbiology results; and antimicrobial therapy received, were collected via an adapted CDC UTI assessment form. Each hospital was surveyed on MTK implementation.

          Figure 1.

          MTK Components

          Results

          Preliminary pre- and post-EC data from the same 14 hospitals are shown. Patients with NUS decreased slightly post-EC, while those with ≥1-specific symptom increased. Treatment of those with NUS declined post-EC, and those with AMS alone received less empiric therapy.

          Figure 2.

          Patient Symptoms Pre- and Post-EC

          Figure 3. Treatment of Patients with NUS or with AMS as Only Symptom

          Twelve hospitals (86%) completed the MTK survey. Six used all components, five some, and one none. Those who implemented the MTK cited flyers and slides as most useful and preferred the AMS flyer. Although available, only 55% of hospitals affirmed provider algorithm use.

          Conclusion

          Post-EC, less patients with a PUC: had NUS, those with NUS were less likely to be treated, and those with AMS alone received less empiric therapy. MTK implementation appeared to impact ASB treatment, and perhaps, testing. Lower use of the testing algorithm may signal a need for simplification. More data are needed to identify which component(s) of the MTK are most effective.

          Disclosures

          L. Davidson, Duke Endowment: Grant Investigator, Grant recipient

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Open Forum Infect Dis
          Open Forum Infect Dis
          ofid
          Open Forum Infectious Diseases
          Oxford University Press (US )
          2328-8957
          November 2018
          26 November 2018
          26 November 2018
          : 5
          : Suppl 1 , ID Week 2018 Abstracts
          : S101
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Quality and Patient Safety, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
          [2 ]Division of Infectious Diseases, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
          [3 ]Information and Analytics Services, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
          Article
          ofy210.246
          10.1093/ofid/ofy210.246
          6253692
          8deb1150-8d2d-46e6-8472-8904a753a419
          © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.

          This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

          History
          Page count
          Pages: 1
          Categories
          Abstracts
          Poster Abstracts

          Comments

          Comment on this article