48
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Underdiagnosis of Dementia: an Observational Study of Patterns in Diagnosis and Awareness in US Older Adults

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="d8754147e221"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d8754147e222">Background</h5> <p id="Par1">Many older adults living with dementia have not been formally diagnosed. Even when clinicians document the diagnosis, patients and families may be unaware of the diagnosis. Knowledge of how individual characteristics affect detection and awareness of dementia is limited. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="d8754147e226"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d8754147e227">Objective</h5> <p id="Par2">To identify characteristics associated with dementia diagnosis and awareness of diagnosis.</p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="d8754147e231"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d8754147e232">Design</h5> <p id="Par3">Cross-sectional observational study.</p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="d8754147e236"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d8754147e237">Participants</h5> <p id="Par4">Five hundred eighty-five adults aged ≥ 65 in the National Health and Aging Trends Study who met assessment-based study criteria for probable dementia in 2011 and had 3 years of continuous, fee-for-service Medicare claims prior to 2011. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="d8754147e241"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d8754147e242">Main Measures</h5> <p id="Par5">Using multivariable logistic regression, we compared participants with undiagnosed versus diagnosed dementia (based on Medicare claims) on demographic, social/behavioral, functional, medical, and healthcare utilization characteristics. Among those diagnosed, we compared characteristics of participants unaware versus aware of the diagnosis (based on self or proxy report). </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="d8754147e246"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d8754147e247">Key Results</h5> <p id="Par6">Among older adults with probable dementia, 58.7% were either undiagnosed (39.5%) or unaware of the diagnosis (19.2%). In adjusted analyses, individuals who were Hispanic (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.19, 5.14), had less than high school education (OR 0.54 for at least high school education, 95% CI 0.32, 0.91), attended medical visits alone (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.11, 3.51), or had fewer functional impairments (OR 0.79 for each impairment, 95% CI 0.69, 0.90) were more likely to be undiagnosed. Similarly, among those diagnosed, having less education (OR 0.42), attending medical visits alone (OR 1.97), and fewer functional impairments (OR 0.72) were associated with unawareness of diagnosis (all <i>p</i>s &lt; 0.05). </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="d8754147e254"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d8754147e255">Conclusions</h5> <p id="Par7">The majority of older adults with dementia are either undiagnosed or unaware of the diagnosis, suggesting shortcomings in detection and communication of dementia. Individuals who may benefit from targeted screening include racial/ethnic minorities and persons who have lower educational attainment, any functional impairment, or attend medical visits alone. </p> </div>

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Prevalence and determinants of undetected dementia in the community: a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis

          Objectives Detection of dementia is essential for improving the lives of patients but the extent of underdetection worldwide and its causes are not known. This study aimed to quantify the prevalence of undetected dementia and to examine its correlates. Methods/setting/participants A systematic search was conducted until October 2016 for studies reporting the proportion of undetected dementia and/or its determinants in either the community or in residential care settings worldwide. Random-effects models calculated the pooled rate of undetected dementia and subgroup analyses were conducted to identify determinants of the variation. Primary and secondary outcome measures The outcome measures of interest were the prevalence and determinants of undetected dementia. Results 23 studies were eligible for inclusion in this review. The pooled rate of undetected dementia was 61.7% (95% CI 55.0% to 68.0%). The rate of underdetection was higher in China and India (vs Europe and North America), in the community setting (vs residential/nursing care), age of <70 years, male gender and diagnosis by general practitioner. However, it was lower in the studies using Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) diagnosis criteria. Conclusions The prevalence of undetected dementia is high globally. Wide variations in detecting dementia need to be urgently examined, particularly in populations with low socioeconomic status. Efforts are required to reduce diagnostic inequality and to improve early diagnosis in the community.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Underdiagnosis of dementia in primary care: variations in the observed prevalence and comparisons to the expected prevalence.

            Dementia is a major and growing health problem. Diagnosis is an important step in the access to care, but many dementia patients remain undiagnosed. This study investigated the magnitude and variation in the difference between 'observed' and 'estimated' prevalence of dementia in general practices. We also explored practice characteristics associated with observed prevalence rates. Six Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) provided data on all general practices (N = 351) in their area in terms of number of doctors, patient list size, number of patients over 65 years of age, socio-economic deprivation status of practices and number of patients on dementia registers. The average observed prevalence overall of dementia amongst patients 65 years and over was 3.0% [95CI 2.8, 3.2]. The observed prevalence was 54.5% [95CI 49.2, 58.9] lower than the prevalence observed in the epidemiological studies in the UK. For an average size general practice (list size of 5269 patients) approximately 27 [95CI 22, 32] patients with dementia may remain undiagnosed. Statistically significant differences in prevalence rates were found between the different PCTs (Wald chi-square = 103.8 p < 0.001). The observed prevalence of dementia was significantly lower among practices run by one GP compared to multiple GPs (p = 0.003), and in more affluent areas (p < 0.001). Just under a half of the expected numbers of patients with dementia are recognised in GP dementia registers. The underdiagnosis of dementia varies with practice characteristics, socio-economic deprivation and between PCTs, which has implications for the local implementation of the National Dementia Strategy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The GPCOG: a new screening test for dementia designed for general practice.

              To design and test a brief, efficient dementia-screening instrument for use by general practitioners (GPs). The General Practitioner Assessment of Cognition (GPCOG) consists of cognitive test items and historical questions asked of an informant. The validity of the measure was assessed by comparison with the criterion standard of diagnoses of dementia derived from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition). Primary care doctors' offices. Sixty-seven GPs administered the GPCOG to 283 community-dwelling patients aged 50 to 74 with memory complaints or aged 75 and older. The Cambridge Mental Disorder of the Elderly Examination, the Abbreviated Mental Test (AMT), the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale, and the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey. The GPCOG was reliable and superior to the AMT (and possibly to the MMSE) in detecting dementia. The two-stage method of administering the GPCOG (cognitive testing followed by informant questions if necessary)had a sensitivity of 0.85, a specificity of 0.86, a misclassification rate of 14%, and positive predictive value of 71.4%. Patient interviews took less than 4 minutes to administer and informant interviews less than 2 minutes. The instrument was reported by GPs to be practical to administer and was acceptable to patients. The GPCOG is a valid, efficient, well-accepted instrument for dementia screening in primary care.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of General Internal Medicine
                J GEN INTERN MED
                Springer Nature
                0884-8734
                1525-1497
                July 2018
                March 5 2018
                July 2018
                : 33
                : 7
                : 1131-1138
                Article
                10.1007/s11606-018-4377-y
                6025653
                29508259
                8df9affb-c6c2-4edc-97cf-ca72cf4ae3d2
                © 2018

                http://www.springer.com/tdm

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article