36
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Artificial Intelligence in Gastroenterology

      Submit here before May 31, 2024

      About Digestion: 3.2 Impact Factor I 6.4 CiteScore I 0.914 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Indwelling Bowel Management System as a Cause of Life-Threatening Rectal Bleeding

      case-report

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A 79-year-old male was transferred to the intensive care unit for postoperative respiratory support. An indwelling bowel management system was inserted for containment of noninfective diarrhoea. Following only 11 days of continual use the patient developed life-threatening rectal bleeding. Preoperative normal rectal mucosa and anatomy were documented. There was no evidence of postoperative coagulopathy. Mesenteric angiography identified bleeding from a branch of the superior rectal artery. Rectal mucosa pressure necrosis secondary to the indwelling Flexi-Seal® Fecal Management System was diagnosed. The patient required an 11-unit transfusion of packed red cells. Following intraarterial coil embolization of the superior rectal artery the bleeding abated. Indwelling bowel management systems are commonly used in immobile and critically ill patients with diarrhoea or faecal incontinence. This is the first report of this important complication in the literature.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical evaluation of a flexible fecal incontinence management system.

          Management of fecal incontinence is a priority in acute and critical care to reduce risk of perineal dermatitis and transmission of nosocomial infections. To evaluate the safety of the Flexi-Seal Fecal Management System in hospitalized patients with diarrhea and incontinence. A prospective, single-arm clinical study with 42 patients from 7 hospitals in the United States was performed. The fecal management system could be used for up to 29 days. The first 11 patients (all from critical care) underwent endoscopic proctoscopy at baseline; 8 of these had endoscopy again after treatment. The remaining 31 patients (from critical or acute care) did not have endoscopy. Rectal mucosa was healthy after use of the device in all patients who had baseline and follow-up endoscopy. Physicians and nurses reported that the system was easy to insert, remove, and dispose of; its use improved management of fecal incontinence; and it was practical, caregiver- and patient-friendly, time-efficient, and efficacious. Skin condition improved or was maintained in more than 92% of patients. Patients' reports of discomfort, pain, burning, or irritation were uncommon. Adverse events were reported for 11 patients (26%). Death (considered unrelated to study treatment) occurred in 5 patients, 2 patients had generalized skin breakdown, and 1 patient had gastrointestinal bleeding after 4 days of treatment. The fecal management system can be used safely in hospitalized patients with diarrhea and fecal incontinence. Additional well-designed, controlled clinical trials may help to measure clinical and economic outcomes associated with the device.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Fecal incontinence in acutely and critically ill patients: options in management.

            Fecal incontinence presents a major challenge in the comprehensive nursing care of acutely and critically ill patients. When manifested as diarrhea, the effects of fecal incontinence can range from mild (superficial skin irritation) to profound (severe perineal dermatitis, dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, and sepsis). Fecal incontinence has many etiologies and risk factors. These include damage to the anal sphincter or pelvic floor, liquid stool consistency, abnormal colonic transport, and decreased intestinal capacity. To avoid or minimize complications, the cause of diarrhea should be addressed, fecal leakage prevented, stool contained, and skin integrity preserved. Management options addressing these goals include diet, pharmacological therapy, and the use of containment products. Management options and their respective advantages and disadvantages are presented with a special focus on safety issues. Diverse approaches are safe only if they are knowledgeably selected, carefully instituted, and constantly monitored for their effects on patient outcomes. Research to identify which options work best in selected clinical situations and which combinations of therapies are most effective is needed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The rectal trumpet: use of a nasopharyngeal airway to contain fecal incontinence in critically ill patients.

              Our objective was to determine if a nasopharyngeal airway (rectal trumpet) could be used as a fecal containment device with less trauma than traditional devices, such as a fecal incontinence pouch or balloon rectal catheter. A single-subject clinical series was used. A nonrandom sample of critically ill adult and geriatric patients (n = 22) with ongoing fecal incontinence who were receiving care in an intensive care and intermediate care unit in a university teaching hospital was used. Direct observation, medical record review, a questionnaire, and interviews were used. The bedside nurses identified patients as study candidates. Clinical findings were documented in the medical record. The nurses providing patient care completed questionnaires. Main outcome measures were parameters related to efficacy, practicality, and complications of use of the rectal trumpet: stool containment, skin and anal sphincter integrity, patient comfort, and ease of insertion. All 22 patients (100%) had containment or improved containment of stool. Observable healing or restoration of skin integrity occurred in 90% of the patients with acquired skin injury (n = 20). None of the patients suffered any change in tone or damage to the anal sphincter. Although 41% of the patients experienced discomfort with insertion of the rectal trumpet, 86% had no discomfort while it was maintained in position. Insertion of the rectal trumpet was rated as easy by 84% of the responding nurses (n = 63). Use of a rectal trumpet was well tolerated by patients and practical for nurses. Incontinence was contained and no untoward effects were noted. Benefits to the patient included wound healing and improved comfort.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Case Rep Gastroenterol
                CRG
                Case Reports in Gastroenterology
                S. Karger AG (Allschwilerstrasse 10, P.O. Box · Postfach · Case postale, CH–4009, Basel, Switzerland · Schweiz · Suisse, Phone: +41 61 306 11 11, Fax: +41 61 306 12 34, karger@karger.ch )
                1662-0631
                Sep-Dec 2008
                05 November 2008
                05 November 2008
                : 2
                : 3
                : 351-355
                Affiliations
                [1] aLeicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK
                [2] bLeicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK
                Author notes
                *Elizabeth Bright, ST2 General Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Leicester General Hospital Gwendolen Road, Leicester LE4 5PW (UK), Tel. +44 116 258 4608, Fax +44 116 258 4708, E-Mail ebright@ 123456doctors.net.uk
                Article
                crg0002-0351
                10.1159/000155147
                3075196
                21490868
                8e03bde9-eee2-4649-8e29-0f8f829d1836
                Copyright © 2008 by S. Karger AG, Basel

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No-Derivative-Works License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). Users may download, print and share this work on the Internet for noncommercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited, and a link to the original work on http://www.karger.com and the terms of this license are included in any shared versions.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 2, References: 7, Pages: 5
                Categories
                Published: November 2008

                Gastroenterology & Hepatology
                gastrointestinal haemorrhage,indwelling catheters,faecal incontinence,diarrhoea

                Comments

                Comment on this article