16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A multicentre, randomised controlled trial to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of Lee Silverman Voice Treatment versus standard NHS Speech and Language Therapy versus control in Parkinson’s disease: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Parkinson’s disease (PD) affects approximately 145,519 people in the UK. Speech impairments are common with a reported prevalence of 68%, which increase physical and mental demands during conversation, reliance on family and/or carers, and the likelihood of social withdrawal reducing quality of life. In the UK, two approaches to Speech and Language Therapy (SLT) intervention are commonly available: National Health Service (NHS) SLT or Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT LOUD®). NHS SLT is tailored to the individuals’ needs per local practice typically consisting of six to eight weekly sessions; LSVT LOUD® comprises 16 sessions of individual treatment with home-based practice over 4 weeks. The evidence-base for their effectiveness is inconclusive.

          Methods/design

          PD COMM is a phase III, multicentre, three-arm, unblinded, randomised controlled trial. Five hundred and forty-six people with idiopathic PD, reporting speech or voice problems will be enrolled. We will exclude those with a diagnosis of dementia, laryngeal pathology or those who have received SLT for speech problems in the previous 2 years. Following informed consent and completion of baseline assessments, participants will be randomised in a 1:1:1 ratio to no-intervention control, NHS SLT or LSVT LOUD® via a central computer-generated programme, using a minimisation procedure with a random element, to ensure allocation concealment. Participants randomised to the intervention groups will start treatment within 4 (NHS SLT) or 7 (LSVT LOUD®) weeks of randomisation.

          Primary outcome: Voice Handicap Index (VHI) total score at 3 months. Secondary outcomes include: VHI subscales, Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire-39; Questionnaire on Acquired Speech Disorders; EuroQol-5D-5 L; ICECAP-O; resource utilisation; adverse events and carer quality of life. Mixed-methods process and health economic evaluations will take place alongside the trial. Assessments will be completed before randomisation and at 3, 6 and 12 months after randomisation.

          The trial started in December 2015 and will run for 77 months. Recruitment will take place in approximately 42 sites around the UK.

          Discussion

          The trial will test the hypothesis that SLT is effective for the treatment of speech or voice problems in people with PD compared to no SLT. It will further test whether NHS SLT or LSVT LOUD® provide greater benefit and determine the cost-effectiveness of both interventions.

          Trial registration

          International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number (ISRCTN) Registry, ID: 12421382. Registered on 18 April 2016. 

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)

          Purpose This article introduces the new 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) health status measure. Methods EQ-5D currently measures health using three levels of severity in five dimensions. A EuroQol Group task force was established to find ways of improving the instrument’s sensitivity and reducing ceiling effects by increasing the number of severity levels. The study was performed in the United Kingdom and Spain. Severity labels for 5 levels in each dimension were identified using response scaling. Focus groups were used to investigate the face and content validity of the new versions, including hypothetical health states generated from those versions. Results Selecting labels at approximately the 25th, 50th, and 75th centiles produced two alternative 5-level versions. Focus group work showed a slight preference for the wording ‘slight-moderate-severe’ problems, with anchors of ‘no problems’ and ‘unable to do’ in the EQ-5D functional dimensions. Similar wording was used in the Pain/Discomfort and Anxiety/Depression dimensions. Hypothetical health states were well understood though participants stressed the need for the internal coherence of health states. Conclusions A 5-level version of the EQ-5D has been developed by the EuroQol Group. Further testing is required to determine whether the new version improves sensitivity and reduces ceiling effects.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide

            Without a complete published description of interventions, clinicians and patients cannot reliably implement interventions that are shown to be useful, and other researchers cannot replicate or build on research findings. The quality of description of interventions in publications, however, is remarkably poor. To improve the completeness of reporting, and ultimately the replicability, of interventions, an international group of experts and stakeholders developed the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. The process involved a literature review for relevant checklists and research, a Delphi survey of an international panel of experts to guide item selection, and a face to face panel meeting. The resultant 12 item TIDieR checklist (brief name, why, what (materials), what (procedure), who provided, how, where, when and how much, tailoring, modifications, how well (planned), how well (actual)) is an extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement (item 5) and the SPIRIT 2013 statement (item 11). While the emphasis of the checklist is on trials, the guidance is intended to apply across all evaluative study designs. This paper presents the TIDieR checklist and guide, with an explanation and elaboration for each item, and examples of good reporting. The TIDieR checklist and guide should improve the reporting of interventions and make it easier for authors to structure accounts of their interventions, reviewers and editors to assess the descriptions, and readers to use the information.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials.

              The protocol of a clinical trial serves as the foundation for study planning, conduct, reporting, and appraisal. However, trial protocols and existing protocol guidelines vary greatly in content and quality. This article describes the systematic development and scope of SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) 2013, a guideline for the minimum content of a clinical trial protocol.The 33-item SPIRIT checklist applies to protocols for all clinical trials and focuses on content rather than format. The checklist recommends a full description of what is planned; it does not prescribe how to design or conduct a trial. By providing guidance for key content, the SPIRIT recommendations aim to facilitate the drafting of high-quality protocols. Adherence to SPIRIT would also enhance the transparency and completeness of trial protocols for the benefit of investigators, trial participants, patients, sponsors, funders, research ethics committees or institutional review boards, peer reviewers, journals, trial registries, policymakers, regulators, and other key stakeholders.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                catherine.sackley@kcl.ac.uk
                caroline.rick@nottingham.ac.uk
                P.Au@bham.ac.uk
                M.Brady@gcu.ac.uk
                Gillian.Beaton@ggc.scot.nhs.uk
                chris.burton@canterbury.ac.uk
                m.caulfield@bangor.ac.uk
                Sylvia.Dickson@gcu.ac.uk
                francis.dowling@addenbrookes.nhs.uk
                M.Hughes@bham.ac.uk
                n.j.ives@bham.ac.uk
                s.jowett@bham.ac.uk
                p.m.algar@bangor.ac.uk
                Avril.Nicoll@gcu.ac.uk
                s.a.patel@bham.ac.uk
                christina.smith@ucl.ac.uk
                r.l.woolley.1@bham.ac.uk
                carlclarke@nhs.net
                Journal
                Trials
                Trials
                Trials
                BioMed Central (London )
                1745-6215
                27 May 2020
                27 May 2020
                2020
                : 21
                : 436
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.13097.3c, ISNI 0000 0001 2322 6764, Population Health Sciences, , Addison House, King’s College London, ; Guy’s Campus, London, SE1 1UL UK
                [2 ]School of Health Science, University of Nottingham, QMC, Nottingham, NG7 2HA UK
                [3 ]GRID grid.4563.4, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8868, Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, , University of Nottingham, ; Building 42, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD UK
                [4 ]GRID grid.6572.6, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7486, Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, , University of Birmingham, ; Birmingham, B15 2TT UK
                [5 ]GRID grid.5214.2, ISNI 0000 0001 0669 8188, NMAHP Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, ; Glasgow, G4 0BA UK
                [6 ]GRID grid.413301.4, ISNI 0000 0001 0523 9342, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, ; Glasgow, UK
                [7 ]GRID grid.127050.1, ISNI 0000 0001 0249 951X, School of Allied and Public Health Professions, Canterbury Christ church University, ; Canterbury, CT1 1QU UK
                [8 ]GRID grid.7362.0, ISNI 0000000118820937, Bangor Institute for Health and Medical Research, School of Healthcare Sciences, Bangor University, ; Bangor, UK
                [9 ]GRID grid.24029.3d, ISNI 0000 0004 0383 8386, Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit, , Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, ; Cambridge, CB2 0QQ UK
                [10 ]GRID grid.6572.6, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7486, Health Economics, University of Birmingham, ; Birmingham,, B15 2TT UK
                [11 ]GRID grid.83440.3b, ISNI 0000000121901201, Division of Psychology and Language Science, Faculty of Brain Sciences, , University College London, ; London, UK
                [12 ]GRID grid.6572.6, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7486, Institute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, ; Birmingham, B15 2TT UK
                [13 ]GRID grid.412919.6, Department of Neurology, , Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, ; Birmingham,, B18 7QH UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7713-9834
                Article
                4354
                10.1186/s13063-020-04354-7
                7251680
                32460885
                8e089e8f-4ef6-4975-b711-dfc35d55acf1
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 19 February 2020
                : 27 April 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000664, Health Technology Assessment Programme;
                Award ID: 10/135/02
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Medicine
                idiopathic parkinson’s disease,lee silverman voice treatment,speech and language therapy,randomised controlled trial,dysarthria

                Comments

                Comment on this article