33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      New Frontiers in the Pathobiology and Treatment of Cancer Regimen-Related Mucosal Injury

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Mucositis is a common complication of chemotherapy, radiotherapy and targeted agents. It often affects compliance to anticancer therapies as it frequently causes schedule delays, interruptions or discontinuations of treatment. Moreover, the economic impact related to the management of mucositis is topical and several estimations of additional hospital costs due to this clinical condition have been recently reported. The ability to determine risk factors for mucositis, to early detect its onset, to assess correctly the degree of this toxicity and to plan its multidisciplinary management are all key elements to guarantee the quality of life of patients and to avoid useless dose reduction or interruption of treatment. The pathogenesis of mucositis is multifactorial and it is classily subdivided into oral and gastrointestinal mucositis according to its anatomic presentation. Treatment and patients’ related factors might help in predicting the frequency and the potential degree of symptoms onset. Here we discuss about clinical presentation and pathogenesis of mucositis in relation to different kinds of treatments. Moreover, we focus on therapeutic and prevention strategies, describing past and present management according to international guidelines and the most promising new data about agents potentially able to further improve the treatment of mucositis in the next future.

          Related collections

          Most cited references91

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Final results from PRIME: randomized phase III study of panitumumab with FOLFOX4 for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

          The Panitumumab Randomized trial In combination with chemotherapy for Metastatic colorectal cancer to determine Efficacy (PRIME) demonstrated that panitumumab-FOLFOX4 significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus FOLFOX4 as first-line treatment of wild-type (WT) KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the primary end point of the study.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Clinical relevance of DPYD variants c.1679T>G, c.1236G>A/HapB3, and c.1601G>A as predictors of severe fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.

            The best-known cause of intolerance to fluoropyrimidines is dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency, which can result from deleterious polymorphisms in the gene encoding DPD (DPYD), including DPYD*2A and c.2846A>T. Three other variants-DPYD c.1679T>G, c.1236G>A/HapB3, and c.1601G>A-have been associated with DPD deficiency, but no definitive evidence for the clinical validity of these variants is available. The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the clinical validity of c.1679T>G, c.1236G>A/HapB3, and c.1601G>A as predictors of severe fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The burdens of cancer therapy. Clinical and economic outcomes of chemotherapy-induced mucositis.

              Mucositis is a common but poorly studied problem among patients with solid tumors. The authors examined the clinical and economic outcomes of oral and gastrointestinal (GI) mucositis among patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. A retrospective, random sample of 599 patients who developed chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression was followed for development of oral or GI mucositis and for development of subsequent episodes of bleeding or infection. Multilevel regression models of the risk of bleeding and infection were fit with chemotherapy cycles nested within patients. Mucositis developed during 37% of 1236 cycles of chemotherapy. Episodes of bleeding were significantly more common during cycles with GI mucositis than during cycles without GI mucositis (13% vs. 8%; P = 0.04). Episodes of infection were significantly more common during cycles with mucositis (especially GI mucositis) than during cycles without mucositis (73% vs. 36%; P < 0.0001). The mean durations of hospitalization were 4 days, 6 days, and 12 days during cycles with no mucositis, oral mucositis, and GI mucositis, respectively. After accounting for the depth and duration of myelosuppression and for other predictive factors, GI mucositis was associated with both bleeding (odds ratio [OR], 2.0; P = 0.01) and infection (OR, 2.24; P < 0.0001), whereas oral mucositis was associated with infection only (OR, 2.4; P < 0.0001). Mucositis was clinically and economically significant among patients with solid tumors who were receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. New preventive and therapeutic agents are needed. Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society.DOI 10.1002/cncr.11671
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Pharmacol
                Front Pharmacol
                Front. Pharmacol.
                Frontiers in Pharmacology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1663-9812
                08 June 2017
                2017
                : 8
                : 354
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Oncology, University and General Hospital Udine, Italy
                [2] 2Department of Oncology, San Bortolo General Hospital Vicenza, Italy
                [3] 3Divisions of Oral Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston MA, United States
                [4] 4Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston, MA, United States
                [5] 5Biomodels LLC, Watertown MA, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Kulmira Nurgali, Victoria University, Australia

                Reviewed by: Loredana Bergandi, University of Turin, Italy; Hu Liu, Anhui Medical University, China

                *Correspondence: Stephen T. Sonis, ssonis@ 123456partners.org

                This article was submitted to Pharmacology of Anti-Cancer Drugs, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology

                Article
                10.3389/fphar.2017.00354
                5462992
                28642709
                8e3d4dd7-f80f-43b1-b42a-ab8f4da51918
                Copyright © 2017 Cinausero, Aprile, Ermacora, Basile, Vitale, Fanotto, Parisi, Calvetti and Sonis.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 12 February 2017
                : 23 May 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 144, Pages: 16, Words: 0
                Categories
                Pharmacology
                Review

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                gastrointestinal mucositis,oral mucositis,pathobiology,anticancer treatment,management

                Comments

                Comment on this article