4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Redistribution of benefits but not detection in a fisheries bycatch-reduction management initiative : Fisheries Bycatch Reduction

      1 , 2 , 2 , 3
      Conservation Biology
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Defining and estimating global marine fisheries bycatch

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Malthusian overfishing and efforts to overcome it on Kenyan coral reefs.

            This study examined trends along a gradient of fishing intensity in an artisanal coral reef fishery over a 10-year period along 75 km of Kenya's most populated coastline. As predicted by Malthusian scenarios, catch per unit effort (CPUE), mean trophic level, the functional diversity of fished taxa, and the diversity of gear declined, while total annual catch and catch variability increased along the fishing pressure gradient. The fishery was able to sustain high (approximately 16 Mg x km(-2) x yr(-1)) but variable yields at high fishing pressure due to the dominance of a few productive herbivorous fish species in the catch. The effect of two separate management strategies to overcome this Malthusian pattern was investigated: fisheries area closure and elimination of the dominant and most "competitive" gear. We found that sites within 5 km of the enforced closure showed significantly lower total catch and CPUE, but increased yield stability and trophic level of catch than predicted by regression models normalized for fishing effort. Sites that had excluded illegal beach seine use through active gear management exhibited increased total catch and CPUE. There was a strong interaction between closure and gear management, which indicates that, for closures to be effective at increasing catch, there must be simultaneous efforts at gear management around the periphery of the closures. We propose that Malthusian effects are responsible for the variation in gear and catch and that active management through reduced effort and reductions in the most competitive gear have the greatest potential to increase the functional and trophic diversity and per-person productivity.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Managing by-catch and discards: how much progress are we making and how can we do better?

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Conservation Biology
                Conservation Biology
                Wiley
                08888892
                February 2018
                February 2018
                November 08 2017
                : 32
                : 1
                : 159-170
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Wildlife Conservation Society; Marine Program; Bronx NY 10460 U.S.A.
                [2 ]Wildlife Conservation Society; Coral Reef Conservation Project; P.O. Box 99470 Mombasa Kenya
                [3 ]Pwani University; P.O. Box 195-80108 Kilifi Kenya
                Article
                10.1111/cobi.12980
                8e553d22-cfb9-4d24-b953-cd8876322aeb
                © 2017

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article