37
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Data on PAGE analysis and MD simulation for the interaction of endonuclease Apn1 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae with DNA substrates containing 5,6-dihydrouracyl and 2-aminopurine

      other

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This article presents new data on nucleotide incision repair (NIR) activity of apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease Apn1 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , which is known as a key player of the base excision DNA repair (BER) pathway, see “Yeast structural gene (APN1) for the major apurinic endonuclease: homology to Escherichia coli endonuclease IV” [1], “Abasic sites in DNA: repair and biological consequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae” [2] and “Characterisation of new substrate specificities of Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae AP endonucleases” [3]. The characterization of NIR activity of wild type Apn1 and mutant form Ape1 H83A were made by denaturing PAGE analysis, and MD simulations of Apn1 complexed with DNA containing 5,6-dihydro-2′-deoxyuridine (DHU) and 2-aminopurine (2-aPu) residues. This data article is associated to the manuscript titled “Apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease Apn1 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae is recruited to the nucleotide incision repair pathway: kinetic and structural features” [4].

          Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ).

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Abasic sites in DNA: repair and biological consequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

          Apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) sites are one of the most frequent spontaneous lesions in DNA. They are potentially mutagenic and lethal lesions that can block DNA replication and transcription. In addition, cleavage of AP sites by AP endonucleases or AP lyases generates DNA single-strand breaks (SSBs) with 5'- or 3'-blocked ends, respectively. Therefore, we suggest that AP sites and 3'- or 5'-blocked SSBs, we name "honorary AP sites", constitute a single class of lesions. In this review, we describe the different mechanisms used by the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to remove or tolerate AP sites and related SSBs. In wild-type cells, AP sites are primarily repaired by the base excision repair (BER) pathway, with the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway as a back up activity. BER is initiated by one of the two AP endonucleases, Apn1 or Apn2. Three DNA N-glycosylases/AP lyases, Ntg1, Ntg2 and Ogg1, can also incise AP sites in DNA. Rad27, a structure specific endonuclease, is involved in the repair of 5'-blocked ends, whereas Apn1, Apn2 and Rad1-Rad10 are involved in the removal of 3'-blocked ends using their 3'-phosphodiesterase and 3'-flap endonuclease activities, respectively. AP sites can stall DNA replication forks, as well as they block in vitro DNA synthesis by DNA polymerase delta. Restart of stalled forks can occur through a recombination-associated pathway initiated by the Mus81-Mms4 endonuclease or mutagenic translesion DNA synthesis (TLS). The mutagenic bypass of AP sites is a two-polymerases affair with an inserter DNA polymerase (Poldelta, Poleta or Rev1) and an extender DNA polymerase (Polzeta). Under normal growth conditions, inactivation of Apn1, Apn2 and Rad1-Rad10 causes cell death. Therefore, the burden of spontaneous AP sites is not compatible with life, in the absence of excision repair pathways. These results in yeast demonstrate that AP sites are critical endogenous DNA damages that cause genetic instability and by analogy could be associated with degenerative pathologies in human.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Validation of metal-binding sites in macromolecular structures with the CheckMyMetal web server.

            Metals have vital roles in both the mechanism and architecture of biological macromolecules. Yet structures of metal-containing macromolecules in which metals are misidentified and/or suboptimally modeled are abundant in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). This shows the need for a diagnostic tool to identify and correct such modeling problems with metal-binding environments. The CheckMyMetal (CMM) web server (http://csgid.org/csgid/metal_sites/) is a sophisticated, user-friendly web-based method to evaluate metal-binding sites in macromolecular structures using parameters derived from 7,350 metal-binding sites observed in a benchmark data set of 2,304 high-resolution crystal structures. The protocol outlines how the CMM server can be used to detect geometric and other irregularities in the structures of metal-binding sites, as well as how it can alert researchers to potential errors in metal assignment. The protocol also gives practical guidelines for correcting problematic sites by modifying the metal-binding environment and/or redefining metal identity in the PDB file. Several examples where this has led to meaningful results are described in the ANTICIPATED RESULTS section. CMM was designed for a broad audience--biomedical researchers studying metal-containing proteins and nucleic acids--but it is equally well suited for structural biologists validating new structures during modeling or refinement. The CMM server takes the coordinates of a metal-containing macromolecule structure in the PDB format as input and responds within a few seconds for a typical protein structure with 2-5 metal sites and a few hundred amino acids.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Geometry of metal-ligand interactions in proteins.

              The geometry of metal-ligand interactions in proteins is examined and compared with information for small-molecule complexes from the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD). The paper deals with the metals Ca, Mg, Mn, Fe, Cu, Zn and with metal-donor atom distances, coordination numbers and extent of distortion from ideal geometry (octahedral, tetrahedral etc.). It assesses the agreement between geometry found in all metalloprotein structures in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) determined at resolution < or = 1.6 A with that predicted from the CSD for ligands which are analogues of amino-acid side chains in proteins [Harding (1999), Acta Cryst. D55, 1432-1443; Harding (2000), Acta Cryst. D56, 857-867]. The agreement is reasonably good for these structures but poorer for many determined at lower resolution (examined to 2.8 A resolution). For metal-donor distances, the predictions from the CSD, with minor adjustments, provide good targets either for validation or for restraints in refinement of structures where only poorer resolution data is available. These target distances are tabulated and the use of restraints is recommended. Validation of angles or the use in refinement of restraints on angles at the metal atom is more difficult because of the inherent flexibility of these angles. A much simplified set of parameters for angle restraints with quite large standard deviations is provided. (Despite the flexibility of the angles, acceptable and preferred coordination numbers and shapes are well established and a summary table is provided.) An unusual and perhaps biochemically important feature of Zn coordination with carboxylate seen in the CSD examples is also clearly present in metalloprotein structures. With metals like Ca, carboxylate coordination is monodentate or bidentate (two M-O bonds of nearly equal length). In Zn carboxylates a continuous range between monodentate and bidentate coordination is found, with one Zn-O bond of normal length and another of any length between this and a van der Waals contact.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Data Brief
                Data Brief
                Data in Brief
                Elsevier
                2352-3409
                12 September 2018
                October 2018
                12 September 2018
                : 20
                : 1515-1524
                Affiliations
                [a ]Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 8 Lavrentyev Ave., Novosibirsk 630090, Russian Federation
                [b ]Department of Natural Sciences, Novosibirsk State University, 2 Pirogov St., Novosibirsk 630090, Russian Federation
                [c ]Groupe «Réparation de l׳ADN», Equipe Labellisée par la Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, CNRS UMR8200, Univ. Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, F-94805 Villejuif, France
                [d ]Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, F-94805 Villejuif, France
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. fedorova@ 123456niboch.nsc.ru
                Article
                S2352-3409(18)31081-3
                10.1016/j.dib.2018.09.007
                6334592
                8e6cb31e-88c4-4b45-bf01-0560949b4c49
                © 2018 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 3 July 2018
                : 29 August 2018
                : 3 September 2018
                Categories
                Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log