13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Informant single screening questions for delirium and dementia in acute care – a cross-sectional test accuracy pilot study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Cognitive impairment often goes undetected in older people in hospital. Efficient screening tools are required to improve detection.

          To determine diagnostic properties of two separate informant-based single screening questions for cognitive impairment (dementia and delirium) in hospitalised older people.

          Methods

          Patients over 65 years non-electively admitted to medical or geriatric wards within a teaching hospital. Our index tests were single screening questions (SSQ), one for dementia (“How has your relative/friend’s memory changed over the past 5 years (up to just before their current illness)?”) and one for delirium (“How has your relative/friend’s memory changed with his/her current illness?”), which were assessed with informant response given on a five point Likert scale.

          Any deterioration on our index tests of SSQ-dementia and SSQ-delirium was accepted as a positive screen for cognitive impairment. Scores were compared to the Informant Questionnaire for Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) >3.38 accepted as dementia, and Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) diagnosis of delirium. We also collected direct cognitive screening data using Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE).

          Results

          Informant responses were obtained in 70/161 (43.5%) patients, median age 80.8 (range:67–97) years; mean MMSE score 18.5 (SD: 8.1). The SSQ-dementia when compared to the IQCODE had a sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 93.1%. The SSQ-delirium when compared to CAM diagnosis had sensitivity of 76.9% and a specificity of 56.1%.

          Conclusions

          These findings show promise for use of an informant single screening question tool as the first step in detection of dementia in older people in acute hospital care, although this approach appears to be less accurate in screening for delirium.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Assessment of cognitive decline in the elderly by informant interview.

          Cognitive decline in a sample of 64 elderly people was assessed by a standardised informant interview dealing with changes in memory and intelligence which had taken place in the previous 10 years. Scores from the interview were found to correlate (r = 0.74) with the Mini-Mental State Examination. Moreover, the informant interview was found to be less affected by pre-morbid ability than the MMSE. Direct assessment of decline by informants may be a solution to the problem of contamination by pre-morbid ability which affects traditional cognitive screening instruments.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Single Question in Delirium (SQiD): testing its efficacy against psychiatrist interview, the Confusion Assessment Method and the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale.

            In this study we address the research question; How sensitive is a single question in delirium case finding? Of 33 'target' admissions, consent was obtained from 21 patients. The single question: 'Do you think [name of patient] has been more confused lately?' was put to friend or family. Results of the Single Question in Delirium (SQiD) were compared to psychiatrist interview (ΨI) which was the reference standard. The Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) and two other tools were also applied. Compared with ΨI, the SQiD achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 80% (95% CI 28.3-99.49%) and 71% (41.90-91.61%) respectively. The CAM demonstrated a negative predictive value (NPV) of 80% (51.91-95.67%) and the SQiD showed a NPV of 91% (58.72-99.77%). Kappa correlation of SQiD with the ΨI was 0.431 (p = 0.023). The CAM had a kappa value of 0.37 (p = 0.050). A further important finding in our study was that the CAM had only 40% sensitivity in the hands of minimally trained clinical users. The SQiD demonstrates potential as a simple clinical tool worthy or further investigation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Combining cognitive testing and informant report to increase accuracy in screening for dementia.

              Cognitive testing and an informant report questionnaire were combined to determine whether their use in combination could improve accuracy in screening for the diagnosis of dementia over either test used alone. Methods of combining test scores that can be readily applied in clinical settings were developed and assessed. The subjects were 106 patients admitted to the geriatric hospital or outpatients assessed at the memory clinic of the university hospital system in Geneva, Switzerland. The instruments used were the Mini-Mental State and the short form of the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly. The diagnosis of dementia was made according to DSM-IV criteria. Logistic regression demonstrated that the combination of the Mini-Mental State and the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly resulted in more accurate prediction of caseness than either test alone. The performance of logical "or" and "and" combinations of test results and a weighted sum of scores on the two tests as screens for dementia were investigated by using receiver operating characteristic analysis. By using suitable cutoff points, both the "or" rule and the weighted sum were shown to be capable of improving performance over that of either test used alone. This study shows that informant report can be formally incorporated into assessment for dementia in such a way as to increase the accuracy of detection of cases and noncases. A graphical method was developed that enables the most robust approach to be applied to individual cases without any calculation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                kirsty.hendry0@gmail.com
                Terry.Quinn@glasgow.ac.uk
                Jonathan.Evans@glasgow.ac.uk
                David.J.Stott@glasgow.ac.uk
                Journal
                BMC Geriatr
                BMC Geriatr
                BMC Geriatrics
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2318
                25 February 2015
                25 February 2015
                2015
                : 15
                : 17
                Affiliations
                [ ]Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
                [ ]Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
                [ ]Academic Section of Geriatric Medicine, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, Room 2:03, 2nd floor New Lister Building Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, G31 2ER UK
                [ ]Academic Section of Geriatric Medicine, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, Room 2.44, 2nd floor New Lister Building Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, G31 2ER UK
                [ ]Mental Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, The Academic Centre, Gartnavel Royal Hospital, R212 Level 2, 1055 Great Western Road, Glasgow, G12 0XH UK
                [ ]Academic Section of Geriatric Medicine, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, Room 9, 2nd floor New Lister building Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, G31 2ER UK
                Article
                16
                10.1186/s12877-015-0016-1
                4345037
                25885022
                8ea4e050-9433-40cf-9a6c-129a5c48bbaa
                © Hendry et al.; licensee BioMed central. 2015

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 17 October 2014
                : 16 February 2015
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Geriatric medicine
                dementia,delirium,cognitive screening,geriatrics,psychology
                Geriatric medicine
                dementia, delirium, cognitive screening, geriatrics, psychology

                Comments

                Comment on this article