17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Community-based initiatives improving critical health literacy: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative evidence

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Critical health literacy enables older adults to make informed health decisions and take actions for the health and wellbeing of themselves and their community, within their own social and cultural context. A community-based approach has the potential to improve the critical health literacy of older adults and their communities. However, it is not clear how such initiatives consider critical health literacy. Therefore, this study explored how community-based initiatives address the critical health literacy of older adults and their communities.

          Methods

          A systematic literature search was conducted. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, as well as the quality of the methodological and community-based elements of the studies. In addition, a meta-synthesis was carried out, consisting of a qualitative text analysis of the results sections of the 23 included studies.

          Results

          We identified two main themes, which are practices that contribute to the critical health literacy of older adults as well as their communities: 1) collaborative learning, and 2) social support. In these practices we identified reciprocity as a key characteristic of both co-learning and social support.

          Conclusions

          This study provides the first overview of community-based initiatives that implicitly address the critical health literacy of older adults and their community. Our results demonstrate that in the context of one’s own life collaborative learning and social support could contribute to people’s understanding and ability to judge, sift and use health information. We therefore suggest to add these two practices to the definition of critical health literacy.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4570-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Health literacy: addressing the health and education divide.

          Health literacy as a discrete form of literacy is becoming increasingly important for social, economic and health development. The positive and multiplier effects of education and general literacy on population health, particularly women's health, are well known and researched. However, a closer analysis of the current HIV/AIDS epidemics, especially in Africa, indicates a complex interface between general literacy and health literacy. While general literacy is an important determinant of health, it is not sufficient to address the major health challenges facing developing and developed societies. As a contribution to the health literacy forum in Health Promotion International, this paper reviews concepts and definitions of literacy and health literacy, and raises conceptual, measurement and strategic challenges. It proposes to develop a set of indicators to quantify health literacy using the experience gained in national literacy surveys around the world. A health literacy index could become an important composite measure of the outcome of health promotion and prevention activities, could document the health competence and capabilities of the population of a given country, community or group and relate it to a set of health, social and economic outcomes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Critical health literacy: a review and critical analysis.

            Though there has been a considerable expansion of interest in the health literacy concept worldwide, there has also been criticism that this concept has been poorly defined, that it stretches the idea of "literacy" to an indefensible extent and more specifically, that it adds little to the existing concerns and intervention approaches of the better established discipline of health promotion. This paper takes as a starting point the expanded model of health literacy advanced by Nutbeam (2000) and addresses these concerns by interrogating the concept of "critical health literacy" in order to draw conclusions about its utility for advancing the health of individuals and communities. The constituent domains of critical health literacy are identified; namely information appraisal, understanding the social determinants of health, and collective action, and as far as possible each are clearly delineated, with links to related concepts made explicit. The paper concludes that an appreciation of work undertaken in a range of different disciplines, such as media studies, medical sociology, and evidence-based medicine can enhance our understanding of the critical health literacy construct and help us understand its usefulness as a social asset which helps individuals towards a critical engagement with health information. There is some evidence that aspects of critical health literacy have indeed been found to be a resource for better health outcomes, but more research is needed in this area, both to develop quantitative and qualitative approaches to evaluating health literacy skills, and to offer convincing evidence that investment in programmes designed to enhance critical health literacy are worthwhile. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Understanding critical health literacy: a concept analysis

              Background Interest in and debates around health literacy have grown over the last two decades and key to the discussions has been the distinction made between basic functional health literacy, communicative/interactive health literacy and critical health literacy. Of these, critical health literacy is the least well developed and differing interpretations of its constituents and relevance exist. The aim of this study is to rigorously analyse the concept of critical health literacy in order to offer some clarity of definition upon which appropriate theory, well grounded practice and potential measurement tools can be based. Method The study uses a theoretical and colloquial evolutionary concept analysis method to systematically identify the features associated with this concept. A unique characteristic of this method is that it practically combines an analysis of the literature with in depth interviews undertaken with practitioners and policy makers who have an interest in the field. The study also analyses how the concept is understood across the contexts of time, place, discipline and use by health professionals, policy makers and academics. Results Findings revealed a distinct set of characteristics of advanced personal skills, health knowledge, information skills, effective interaction between service providers and users, informed decision making and empowerment including political action as key features of critical health literacy. The potential consequences of critical health literacy identified are in improving health outcomes, creating more effective use of health services and reducing inequalities in health thus demonstrating the relevance of this concept to public health and health promotion. Conclusions While critical health literacy is shown to be a unique concept, there remain significant contextual variations in understanding particularly between academics, practitioners and policy makers. Key attributes presented as part of this concept when it was first introduced in the literature, particularly those around empowerment, social and political action and the existence of the concept at both an individual and population level, have been lost in more recent representations. This has resulted in critical health literacy becoming restricted to a higher order cognitive individual skill rather than a driver for political and social change. The paper argues that in order to retain the uniqueness and usefulness of the concept in practice efforts should be made to avoid this dilution of meaning.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +31 (0)6 37327616 , +31 (0)50 363 3783 , l.s.de.wit@rug.nl , liesbeth.s.dewit@gmail.com
                c.fenenga@aighd.org
                Cinzia.giammarchi@gmail.com
                lucia.difuria@regione.marche.it
                hutter@iss.nl
                a.f.de.winter@umcg.nl
                L.B.Meijering@rug.nl
                Journal
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2458
                20 July 2017
                20 July 2017
                2018
                : 18
                : 40
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0407 1981, GRID grid.4830.f, , University of Groningen, Population Research Centre / Urban and Regional Studies Institute, ; Landleven 1, P.O. Box 800, 9700 AV Groningen, The Netherlands
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 4655 0462, GRID grid.450091.9, , Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, ; Trinity Building C, 3rd Floor Pietersbergweg 17, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [3 ]Agenzia Regionale Sanitaria (The Regional Agency for Health), Marche Region, Via Gentile da Fabriano n.3 nel palazzo Rossini, 60125 Ancona, Italy
                [4 ]ISNI 0000000092621349, GRID grid.6906.9, , International Institute of Social Studies, The Hague, of Erasmus University Rotterdam, ; The Netherlands, Kortenaerkade 12, 2518 AX The Hague, The Netherlands
                [5 ]Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Postbus 196, 9700 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1649-0062
                Article
                4570
                10.1186/s12889-017-4570-7
                5520348
                28728547
                8eaac2ad-b7ea-42fe-bae7-500ae21be580
                © The Author(s). 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 30 January 2017
                : 5 July 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: European Union 7th Framework Programme
                Award ID: 305831
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Public health
                systematic review,meta-synthesis,qualitative data analysis,critical health literacy,community-based initiatives,older adults,communities,social and cultural context

                Comments

                Comment on this article