39
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Berlin Affective Word List for Children (kidBAWL): Exploring Processing of Affective Lexical Semantics in the Visual and Auditory Modalities

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          While research on affective word processing in adults witnesses increasing interest, the present paper looks at another group of participants that have been neglected so far: pupils (age range: 6–12 years). Introducing a variant of the Berlin Affective Wordlist (BAWL) especially adapted for children of that age group, the “kidBAWL,” we examined to what extent pupils process affective lexical semantics similarly to adults. In three experiments using rating and valence decision tasks in both the visual and auditory modality, it was established that children show the two ubiquitous phenomena observed in adults with emotional word material: the asymmetric U-shaped function relating valence to arousal ratings, and the inversely U-shaped function relating response times to valence decision latencies. The results for both modalities show large structural similarities between pupil and adult data (taken from previous studies) indicating that in the present age range, the affective lexicon and the dynamic interplay between language and emotion is already well-developed. Differential effects show that younger children tend to choose less extreme ratings than older children and that rating latencies decrease with age. Overall, our study should help to develop more realistic models of word recognition and reading that include affective processes and offer a methodology for exploring the roots of pleasant literary experiences and ludic reading.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: the mobilization-minimization hypothesis.

          Negative (adverse or threatening) events evoke strong and rapid physiological, cognitive, emotional, and social responses. This mobilization of the organism is followed by physiological, cognitive, and behavioral responses that damp down, minimize, and even erase the impact of that event. This pattern of mobilization-minimization appears to be greater for negative events than for neutral or positive events. Theoretical accounts of this response pattern are reviewed. It is concluded that no single theoretical mechanism can explain the mobilization-minimization pattern, but that a family of integrated process models, encompassing different classes of responses, may account for this pattern of parallel but disparately caused effects.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Affect, cognition, and awareness: affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures.

            The affective primacy hypothesis (R. B. Zajonc, 1980) asserts that positive and negative affective reactions can be evoked with minimal stimulus input and virtually no cognitive processing. The present work tested this hypothesis by comparing the effects of affective and cognitive priming under extremely brief (suboptimal) and longer (optimal) exposure durations. At suboptimal exposures only affective primes produced significant shifts in Ss' judgments of novel stimuli. These results suggest that when affect is elicited outside of conscious awareness, it is diffuse and nonspecific, and its origin and address are not accessible. Having minimal cognitive participation, such gross and nonspecific affective reactions can therefore be diffused or displaced onto unrelated stimuli. At optimal exposures this pattern of results was reversed such that only cognitive primes produced significant shifts in judgments. Together, these results support the affective primacy hypothesis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model.

              A model of orthographic processing is described that postulates read-out from different information dimensions, determined by variable response criteria set on these dimensions. Performance in a perceptual identification task is simulated as the percentage of trials on which a noisy criterion set on the dimension of single word detector activity is reached. Two additional criteria set on the dimensions of total lexical activity and time from stimulus onset are hypothesized to be operational in the lexical decision task. These additional criteria flexibly adjust to changes in stimulus material and task demands, thus accounting for strategic influences on performance in this task. The model unifies results obtained in response-limited and data-limited paradigms and helps resolve a number of inconsistencies in the experimental literature that cannot be accommodated by other current models of visual word recognition.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                30 June 2016
                2016
                : 7
                : 969
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Experimental and Neurocognitive Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin Berlin, Germany
                [2] 2Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Universität Salzburg Salzburg, Austria
                [3] 3Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Freie Universität Berlin Berlin, Germany
                Author notes

                Edited by: F-Xavier Alario, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and Aix-Marseille Université, France

                Reviewed by: Joana Acha, Basque Centre on Cognition, Brain and Language, Spain; Patrick Bonin, University of Bourgogne, Institut Universitaire de France, France

                *Correspondence: Teresa Sylvester teresa.sylvester@ 123456fu-berlin.de

                This article was submitted to Language Sciences, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00969
                4928334
                27445930
                8ec1269c-59d0-4fc9-8b10-529057eddbcc
                Copyright © 2016 Sylvester, Braun, Schmidtke and Jacobs.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 09 March 2016
                : 10 June 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 4, Equations: 0, References: 65, Pages: 11, Words: 8755
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                kidbawl,panksepp-jakobson hypothesis,affective semantics,negativity bias,informational density hypothesis,positivity superiority effect,valence,arousal

                Comments

                Comment on this article