11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      South-western Atlantic reef fishes: Zoogeographical patterns and ecological drivers reveal a secondary biodiversity centre in the Atlantic Ocean

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Capacity shortfalls hinder the performance of marine protected areas globally

          Although 71% of marine protected areas are benefiting fish populations, their effects are highly variable, with staff capacity proving to be the most important explanatory variable.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Fish biodiversity and conservation in South America.

            The freshwater and marine fish faunas of South America are the most diverse on Earth, with current species richness estimates standing above 9100 species. In addition, over the last decade at least 100 species were described every year. There are currently about 5160 freshwater fish species, and the estimate for the freshwater fish fauna alone points to a final diversity between 8000 and 9000 species. South America also has c. 4000 species of marine fishes. The mega-diverse fish faunas of South America evolved over a period of >100 million years, with most lineages tracing origins to Gondwana and the adjacent Tethys Sea. This high diversity was in part maintained by escaping the mass extinctions and biotic turnovers associated with Cenozoic climate cooling, the formation of boreal and temperate zones at high latitudes and aridification in many places at equatorial latitudes. The fresh waters of the continent are divided into 13 basin complexes, large basins consolidated as a single unit plus historically connected adjacent coastal drainages, and smaller coastal basins grouped together on the basis of biogeographic criteria. Species diversity, endemism, noteworthy groups and state of knowledge of each basin complex are described. Marine habitats around South America, both coastal and oceanic, are also described in terms of fish diversity, endemism and state of knowledge. Because of extensive land use changes, hydroelectric damming, water divergence for irrigation, urbanization, sedimentation and overfishing 4-10% of all fish species in South America face some degree of extinction risk, mainly due to habitat loss and degradation. These figures suggest that the conservation status of South American freshwater fish faunas is better than in most other regions of the world, but the marine fishes are as threatened as elsewhere. Conserving the remarkable aquatic habitats and fishes of South America is a growing challenge in face of the rapid anthropogenic changes of the 21st century, and deserves attention from conservationists and policy makers.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A realignment of marine biogeographic provinces with particular reference to fish distributions

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Diversity and Distributions
                Divers Distrib
                Wiley
                13669516
                July 2018
                July 2018
                March 02 2018
                : 24
                : 7
                : 951-965
                Affiliations
                [1 ]California Academy of Sciences; San Francisco CA USA
                [2 ]Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department; University of California Santa Cruz; Santa Cruz CA USA
                [3 ]Associação Ambiental Voz da Natureza; Vitória ES Brazil
                [4 ]Laboratório de Ecologia Marinha; Universidade Vila Velha; Vila Velha ES Brazil
                [5 ]Fish Bizz Ltda.; São Paulo SP Brazil
                [6 ]Laboratório de Biogeografia e Macroecologia Marinha; Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; Florianópolis SC Brazil
                [7 ]Núcleo em Ecologia e Desenvolvimento Socioambiental de Macaé; Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; Macaé RJ Brazil
                [8 ]Departamento de Biologia Marinha; Universidade Federal Fluminense; Niterói RJ Brazil
                [9 ]Centro de Ciências Exatas e da Natureza; Universidade Federal da Paraíba; João Pessoa PB Brazil
                [10 ]Departamento de Engenharia e Meio Ambiente; Universidade Federal da Paraíba; Rio Tinto PB Brazil
                [11 ]Departamento de Oceanografia e Ecologia; Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo; Vitória ES Brazil
                [12 ]Department of Biological Sciences; Macquarie University; Sydney NSW Australia
                [13 ]Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods; Charles Darwin University; Darwin NT Australia
                [14 ]Instituto de Biologia and SAGE/COPPE; Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; Rio de Janeiro RJ Brazil
                [15 ]Laboratório de Ecologia Bentônica; Universidade Federal da Bahia; Salvador BA Brazil
                [16 ]Laboratório de Ictiologia e Conservação; Universidade Federal de Alagoas; Penedo AL Brazil
                [17 ]Museu de Zoologia; Universidade Estadual de Campinas; Campinas SP Brazil
                Article
                10.1111/ddi.12729
                8efc6df9-cf69-4190-98ca-67ca3c7d8491
                © 2018

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article