14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Alteration of brain network topology in HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder: A novel functional connectivity perspective

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          HIV is capable of invading the brain soon after seroconversion. This ultimately can lead to deficits in multiple cognitive domains commonly referred to as HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND). Clinical diagnosis of such deficits requires detailed neuropsychological assessment but clinical signs may be difficult to detect during asymptomatic injury of the central nervous system (CNS). Therefore neuroimaging biomarkers are of particular interest in HAND. In this study, we constructed brain connectivity profiles of 40 subjects (20 HIV positive subjects and 20 age-matched seronegative controls) using two different methods: a non-linear mutual connectivity analysis approach and a conventional method based on Pearson's correlation. These profiles were then summarized using graph-theoretic methods characterizing their topological network properties. Standard clinical and laboratory assessments were performed and a battery of neuropsychological (NP) tests was administered for all participating subjects. Based on NP testing, 14 of the seropositive subjects exhibited mild neurologic impairment. Subsequently, we analyzed associations between the network derived measures and neuropsychological assessment scores as well as common clinical laboratory plasma markers (CD4 cell count, HIV RNA) after adjusting for age and gender. Mutual connectivity analysis derived graph-theoretic measures, Modularity and Small Worldness, were significantly ( p < 0.05, FDR adjusted) associated with the Executive as well as Overall z-score of NP performance. In contrast, network measures derived from conventional correlation-based connectivity did not yield any significant results. Thus, changes in connectivity can be captured using advanced time-series analysis techniques. The demonstrated associations between imaging-derived graph-theoretic properties of brain networks with neuropsychological performance, provides opportunities to further investigate the evolution of HAND in larger, longitudinal studies. Our analysis approach, involving non-linear time-series analysis in conjunction with graph theory, is promising and it may prove to be useful not only in HAND but also in other neurodegenerative disorders.

          Highlights

          • Currently, cognitive impairment in HIV positive individuals is detected using detailed neuropsychological testing.

          • Analysis of fMRI data using MCA-GRBF method revealed significant associations with current clinical standards.

          • In contrast, functional connectivity analysis using conventional correlation analysis does not produce any such associations.

          • Nonlinear analysis using MCA-GRBF method can potentially capture relevant information when compared to conventional methods.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Network modelling methods for FMRI.

            There is great interest in estimating brain "networks" from FMRI data. This is often attempted by identifying a set of functional "nodes" (e.g., spatial ROIs or ICA maps) and then conducting a connectivity analysis between the nodes, based on the FMRI timeseries associated with the nodes. Analysis methods range from very simple measures that consider just two nodes at a time (e.g., correlation between two nodes' timeseries) to sophisticated approaches that consider all nodes simultaneously and estimate one global network model (e.g., Bayes net models). Many different methods are being used in the literature, but almost none has been carefully validated or compared for use on FMRI timeseries data. In this work we generate rich, realistic simulated FMRI data for a wide range of underlying networks, experimental protocols and problematic confounds in the data, in order to compare different connectivity estimation approaches. Our results show that in general correlation-based approaches can be quite successful, methods based on higher-order statistics are less sensitive, and lag-based approaches perform very poorly. More specifically: there are several methods that can give high sensitivity to network connection detection on good quality FMRI data, in particular, partial correlation, regularised inverse covariance estimation and several Bayes net methods; however, accurate estimation of connection directionality is more difficult to achieve, though Patel's τ can be reasonably successful. With respect to the various confounds added to the data, the most striking result was that the use of functionally inaccurate ROIs (when defining the network nodes and extracting their associated timeseries) is extremely damaging to network estimation; hence, results derived from inappropriate ROI definition (such as via structural atlases) should be regarded with great caution. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Brain graphs: graphical models of the human brain connectome.

              Brain graphs provide a relatively simple and increasingly popular way of modeling the human brain connectome, using graph theory to abstractly define a nervous system as a set of nodes (denoting anatomical regions or recording electrodes) and interconnecting edges (denoting structural or functional connections). Topological and geometrical properties of these graphs can be measured and compared to random graphs and to graphs derived from other neuroscience data or other (nonneural) complex systems. Both structural and functional human brain graphs have consistently demonstrated key topological properties such as small-worldness, modularity, and heterogeneous degree distributions. Brain graphs are also physically embedded so as to nearly minimize wiring cost, a key geometric property. Here we offer a conceptual review and methodological guide to graphical analysis of human neuroimaging data, with an emphasis on some of the key assumptions, issues, and trade-offs facing the investigator. © 2011 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Neuroimage Clin
                Neuroimage Clin
                NeuroImage : Clinical
                Elsevier
                2213-1582
                07 December 2017
                2018
                07 December 2017
                : 17
                : 768-777
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department Biomedical Engineering, University of Rochester, NY, USA
                [b ]Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Rochester, NY, USA
                [c ]Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
                [d ]Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester, NY, USA
                [e ]Department of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester, NY, USA
                [f ]Department of Neurology, University of Rochester, NY, USA
                [g ]Faculty of Medicine and Institute of Clinical Radiology, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Rochester Center for Brain Imaging, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY 14627, USA.Rochester Center for Brain ImagingUniversity of Rochester601 Elmwood AvenueRochesterNY14627USA anas.abidin@ 123456rochester.edu
                [1]

                Equal contributions.

                Article
                S2213-1582(17)30305-4
                10.1016/j.nicl.2017.11.025
                5842750
                29527484
                8f0d2b20-be70-4c43-8b68-424f720b50bf
                © 2017 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 28 September 2017
                : 13 November 2017
                : 30 November 2017
                Categories
                Regular Article

                hiv,hiv associated neurocognitive disorder,functional magnetic resonance imaging,functional connectivity,mutual connectivity analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article