6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Feasibility study of using fall-off gradients of early and late PET scans for proton range verification

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          While positron emission tomography (PET) allows for the imaging of tissues activated by proton beams in terms of monitoring the therapy administered, most endogenous tissue elements are activated by relatively high energy protons. Therefore, a relatively large distance off-set exists between the dose fall-off and activity fall-off. However, 16O(p,2p,2n) 13N has a relatively low energy threshold which peaks around 12 MeV and also a residual proton range that is approximately 1 to 2 mm. In this phantom study, we tested the feasibility of utilizing the 13N production peak as well as the differences in activity fall-off between early and late PET scans for proton range verification. One of the main purposes for this research was developing a proton range verification methodology that would not require Monte Carlo simulations.

          Methods and Materials

          Both mono-energetic and spread-out Bragg peak beams were delivered to two phantoms – a water-like gel and a tissue-like gel where the proton ranges came to be approximately 9.9 and 9.1 cm, respectively. After 1 min of post-irradiation delay, the phantoms were scanned for a period of 30 min using an in-room PET. Two separate (Early and Late) PET images were reconstructed using two different post-irradiation delays and acquisition times; Early PET: 1 min delay and 3 min acquisition, Late PET: 21 min delay and 10 min acquisition. The depth gradients of the PET signals were then normalized and plotted as functions of depth. The normalized gradient of the early PET images was subtracted from that of the late PET images, to observe the 13N activity distribution in relation to depth. Monte Carlo simulations were also conducted with the same set-up as the measurements stated previously.

          Results

          The subtracted gradients show peaks at 9.4 cm and 8.6 cm in water-gel and tissue-gel respectively for both pristine and SOBP beams. These peaks are created in connection with the sudden change of 13N signals with depth and consistently occur 2 mm upstream to where 13N signals were most abundantly created (9.6 cm and 8.8 cm in water-gel and tissue-gel, respectively). Monte Carlo simulations provided similar results as the measurements.

          Conclusions

          The subtracted PET signal gradient peaks and the proton ranges for water-gel and tissue-gel show distance off-sets of 4 to 5 mm. This off-set may potentially be used for proton range verification using only the PET measured data without Monte Carlo simulations. More studies are necessary to overcome various limitations, such as perfusion-driven washout, for the feasibility of this technique in living patients.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Journal
          0425746
          5648
          Med Phys
          Med Phys
          Medical physics
          0094-2405
          2473-4209
          18 March 2017
          30 March 2017
          May 2017
          01 May 2018
          : 44
          : 5
          : 1734-1746
          Affiliations
          Department of Physics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA
          Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
          Department of Radiological Science, College of Health Science, Yonsei University, Wonju, Kangwon-Do, Republic of Korea
          Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
          Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
          Department of Radiological Science, College of Health Science, Yonsei University, Wonju, Kangwon-Do, Republic of Korea
          Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
          Author notes
          [a) ]Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. jongmin.cho@ 123456okstate.edu
          Article
          PMC5462437 PMC5462437 5462437 nihpa858391
          10.1002/mp.12191
          5462437
          28273345
          8f1f5088-f174-43a4-85c5-3d847794e819
          History
          Categories
          Article

          Proton therapy,positron emission tomography (PET),proton range verification, 13N,tissue composition,Monte Carlo simulation,radioactive decay

          Comments

          Comment on this article