25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Deprescribing interventions and their impact on medication adherence in community-dwelling older adults with polypharmacy: a systematic review

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Polypharmacy, and the associated adverse drug events such as non-adherence to prescriptions, is a common problem for elderly people living with multiple comorbidities. Deprescribing, i.e. the gradual withdrawal from medications with supervision by a healthcare professional, is regarded as a means of reducing adverse effects of multiple medications including non-adherence. This systematic review examines the evidence of deprescribing as an effective strategy for improving medication adherence amongst older, community dwelling adults.

          Methods

          A mixed methods review was undertaken. Eight bibliographic database and two clinical trials registers were searched between May and December 2017. Results were double screened in accordance with pre-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria related to polypharmacy, deprescribing and adherence in older, community dwelling populations. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used for quality appraisal and an a priori data collection instrument was used. For the quantitative studies, a narrative synthesis approach was taken. The qualitative data was analysed using framework analysis. Findings were integrated using a mixed methods technique. The review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA reporting statement.

          Results

          A total of 22 original studies were included, of which 12 were RCTs. Deprescribing with adherence as an outcome measure was identified in randomised controlled trials (RCTs), observational and cohort studies from 13 countries between 1996 and 2017. There were 17 pharmacy-led interventions; others were led by General Practitioners (GP) and nurses. Four studies demonstrated an overall reduction in medications of which all studies corresponded with improved adherence. A total of thirteen studies reported improved adherence of which 5 were RCTs. Adherence was reported as a secondary outcome in all but one study.

          Conclusions

          There is insufficient evidence to show that deprescribing improves medication adherence. Only 13 studies (of 22) reported adherence of which only 5 were randomised controlled trials. Older people are particularly susceptible to non-adherence due to multi-morbidity associated with polypharmacy. Bio-psycho-social factors including health literacy and multi-disciplinary team interventions influence adherence. The authors recommend further study into the efficacy and outcomes of medicines management interventions. A consensus on priority outcome measurements for prescribed medications is indicated.

          Trial registration

          PROSPERO number CRD42017075315.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-019-1031-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies.

          The expansion of evidence-based practice across sectors has lead to an increasing variety of review types. However, the diversity of terminology used means that the full potential of these review types may be lost amongst a confusion of indistinct and misapplied terms. The objective of this study is to provide descriptive insight into the most common types of reviews, with illustrative examples from health and health information domains. Following scoping searches, an examination was made of the vocabulary associated with the literature of review and synthesis (literary warrant). A simple analytical framework -- Search, AppraisaL, Synthesis and Analysis (SALSA) -- was used to examine the main review types. Fourteen review types and associated methodologies were analysed against the SALSA framework, illustrating the inputs and processes of each review type. A description of the key characteristics is given, together with perceived strengths and weaknesses. A limited number of review types are currently utilized within the health information domain. Few review types possess prescribed and explicit methodologies and many fall short of being mutually exclusive. Notwithstanding such limitations, this typology provides a valuable reference point for those commissioning, conducting, supporting or interpreting reviews, both within health information and the wider health care domain.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book Chapter: not found

            Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Adherence to Medication

              New England Journal of Medicine, 353(5), 487-497
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                joanna.Ulley@nhs.net
                d.harrop@shu.ac.uk
                Ali.Ali@sth.nhs.uk
                sarah.alton@sth.nhs.uk
                s.fowler-davis@shu.ac.uk
                Journal
                BMC Geriatr
                BMC Geriatr
                BMC Geriatrics
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2318
                18 January 2019
                18 January 2019
                2019
                : 19
                : 15
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9422 8284, GRID grid.31410.37, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, ; Sheffield, England
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0303 540X, GRID grid.5884.1, Sheffield Hallam University, ; Montgomery House, 32 Collegiate Crescent, Sheffield, S10 2BP England
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3870-9272
                Article
                1031
                10.1186/s12877-019-1031-4
                6339421
                30658576
                8f259cc0-2a1a-4471-83fa-35a57e553c73
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 11 October 2018
                : 9 January 2019
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Geriatric medicine
                polypharmacy,deprescribing,adherence,systematic review,older person
                Geriatric medicine
                polypharmacy, deprescribing, adherence, systematic review, older person

                Comments

                Comment on this article