7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Long-term survival of critically ill patients stratified by pandemic triage categories: a retrospective cohort study

      research-article
      , PhD 1 , 2 , , , MD 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , , PhD 2 , 3 , , FCICM 1 , , MD 3 , 5 , 6
      Chest
      Published by Elsevier Inc under license from the American College of Chest Physicians.
      Pandemic, triage, intensive care unit, disaster preparedness, SOFA score, comorbidity, ICU, Intensive Care Unit, SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, ANZICS, Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society, APD, Adult Patient Database, Victorian Admitted Episode Dataset, VAED, ICD-10, International Classification of Diseases, Version 10, NSW, New South Wales, APACHE, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation, ANZROD, Australian and New Zealand Risk of Death

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The COVID-19 pandemic has led to unprecedented demand for ICU, with the need to triage admissions along with the development of ICU triage criteria. However, how these criteria relate to outcomes in patients already admitted to ICU is unknown, as is the incremental ICU capacity that triage of these patients might create given existing admission practices.

          Research Question

          What is the short and long-term survival of low vs. high priority patients for ICU admission according to current pandemic triage criteria?

          Study Design

          and Methods: We analysed prospectively collected registry data (2007-2018) in 23 ICUs in Victoria, Australia, with probabilistic linkage with death registries. After excluding elective surgery, we stratified admissions by existing ICU triage protocol prioritization as low (age >85 years, or severe chronic illness, or Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [SOFA] score = 0 or ≥12), medium (SOFA score 8-11) or high (SOFA score 1-7) priority. The primary outcome was long-term survival. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, ICU length of stay (LOS) and bed-day usage.

          Results

          We studied 126,687 ICU admissions. After five-years of follow up, 1093/3296 (33%, 95%CI 32%-34%) of “low-priority” patients aged >85 years or with severe chronic illness, and 86/332 (26%, 95%CI 24%-28%) with a SOFA score ≥12 were still alive. 63/290 [22%, 95% CI 17%-27%] of patients in these groups followed for 10 years were still alive. Together, low priority patients accounted for 27% of all ICU bed-days, and had lower in-hospital mortality (22%) than than high priority patients (28%). Among non-survivors, low-priority admissions had shorter ICU LOS than medium or high-priority admissions.

          Interpretation

          Current SOFA-score or age or severe comorbidity-based ICU pandemic triage protocols exclude patients with a close to 80% hospital survival, a >30% five-year survival and 27% of ICU bed-day use. These findings imply the need for stronger evidence-based ICU triage protocols.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Chest
          Chest
          Chest
          Published by Elsevier Inc under license from the American College of Chest Physicians.
          0012-3692
          1931-3543
          9 March 2021
          9 March 2021
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Department of Intensive Care, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
          [2 ]Centre for Integrated Critical Care, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
          [3 ]Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
          [4 ]Data Analytics Research & Evaluation Centre, The University of Melbourne and Austin Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
          [5 ]Department of Intensive Care, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
          [6 ]Centre for Outcome and Resource Evaluation, Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
          Author notes
          []Correspondence to: Dr Jai Darvall, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan St, Parkville, VIC 3050 Australia. Tel +61 3 93427000, . ORCID: 0000-0003-0579-8931
          Article
          S0012-3692(21)00475-X
          10.1016/j.chest.2021.03.002
          7941020
          8f261dfd-6b6d-4814-91f2-5db1577faf04
          © 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc under license from the American College of Chest Physicians.

          Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

          History
          Categories
          Original Research

          Respiratory medicine
          pandemic,triage,intensive care unit,disaster preparedness,sofa score,comorbidity,icu, intensive care unit,sofa, sequential organ failure assessment,anzics, australian and new zealand intensive care society,apd, adult patient database,victorian admitted episode dataset, vaed,icd-10, international classification of diseases, version 10,nsw, new south wales,apache, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation,anzrod, australian and new zealand risk of death

          Comments

          Comment on this article