+1 Recommend
1 collections
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Response of the Rabbit Coronary Arteries to Autonomic Agents

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.


          The right or left coronary arteries were constricted by cholinergic agents and dilated by adrenergic agents. The receptors mediating cholinergic responses are muscarinic. Comparison with the ear artery indicates that the adrenergic receptors mediating dilatation in the coronary artery resemble β<sub>1</sub> rather than β<sub>2</sub>. However, the ratios of the dilator potencies of noradrenaline, adrenaline and isoprenaline on the coronary artery were 1:0.23:2.6 compared with ratios of their positive inotropic potencies of 1:1.1:33 on the rabbit papillary muscle. The markedly smaller relative potency of noradrenaline on the papillary muscle may be due to uptake<sub>1</sub>, since the potentiating effect of cocaine on noradrenaline on this tissue was approximately 12-fold, but was negligible on the coronary artery. The contribution of uptake<sub>2</sub> is unclear, since histochemical observations indicated selective accumulation of noradrenaline in the wall of the artery, whereas the dilator responses were not appreciably altered by uptake<sub>2</sub> inhibitors.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          J Vasc Res
          Journal of Vascular Research
          S. Karger AG
          18 September 2008
          : 11
          : 5-6
          : 319-337
          Department of Human Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide
          158025 Blood Vessels 1974;11:319–337
          © 1974 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          Page count
          Pages: 19
          Research Paper


          Comment on this article