27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Microbial resistance to nanotechnologies: An important but understudied consideration using antimicrobial nanotechnologies in orthopaedic implants

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Microbial resistance to current antibiotics therapies is a major cause of implant failure and adverse clinical outcomes in orthopaedic surgery. Recent developments in advanced antimicrobial nanotechnologies provide numerous opportunities to effective remove resistant bacteria and prevent resistance from occurring through unique mechanisms. With tunable physicochemical properties, nanomaterials can be designed to be bactericidal, antifouling, immunomodulating, and capable of delivering antibacterial compounds to the infection region with spatiotemporal accuracy. Despite its substantial advancement, an important, but under-explored area, is potential microbial resistance to nanomaterials and how this can impact the clinical use of antimicrobial nanotechnologies. This review aims to provide a better understanding of nanomaterial-associated microbial resistance to accelerate bench-to-bedside translations of emerging nanotechnologies for effective control of implant associated infections.

          Graphical abstract

          Highlights

          • Current understanding of mechanisms of microbial resistance were overviewed.

          • Potential risks of microbial resistance by using different antibacterial nanotechnologies were evaluated.

          • Correlation of design principle, composition, surface functionalization, structural modifications of different antibacterial nanomaterials to microbial resistance was discussed.

          • Challenges and future opportunities of antibacterial nanotechnologies for implant associated infection were discussed, targetting clinical development and industrial scalability.

          Related collections

          Most cited references315

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Photothermal therapy and photoacoustic imaging via nanotheranostics in fighting cancer

          The development, perspectives, and challenges of photothermal therapy (PTT) and photoacoustic imaging (PAI) via nanotheranostics for combating cancer. The nonradiative conversion of light energy into heat (photothermal therapy, PTT) or sound energy (photoacoustic imaging, PAI) has been intensively investigated for the treatment and diagnosis of cancer, respectively. By taking advantage of nanocarriers, both imaging and therapeutic functions together with enhanced tumour accumulation have been thoroughly studied to improve the pre-clinical efficiency of PAI and PTT. In this review, we first summarize the development of inorganic and organic nano photothermal transduction agents (PTAs) and strategies for improving the PTT outcomes, including applying appropriate laser dosage, guiding the treatment via imaging techniques, developing PTAs with absorption in the second NIR window, increasing photothermal conversion efficiency (PCE), and also increasing the accumulation of PTAs in tumours. Second, we introduce the advantages of combining PTT with other therapies in cancer treatment. Third, the emerging applications of PAI in cancer-related research are exemplified. Finally, the perspectives and challenges of PTT and PAI for combating cancer, especially regarding their clinical translation, are discussed. We believe that PTT and PAI having noteworthy features would become promising next-generation non-invasive cancer theranostic techniques and improve our ability to combat cancers.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Defensins: antimicrobial peptides of innate immunity.

            Tomas Ganz (2003)
            The production of natural antibiotic peptides has emerged as an important mechanism of innate immunity in plants and animals. Defensins are diverse members of a large family of antimicrobial peptides, contributing to the antimicrobial action of granulocytes, mucosal host defence in the small intestine and epithelial host defence in the skin and elsewhere. This review, inspired by a spate of recent studies of defensins in human diseases and animal models, focuses on the biological function of defensins.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Understanding the Mysterious M2 Macrophage through Activation Markers and Effector Mechanisms

              The alternatively activated or M2 macrophages are immune cells with high phenotypic heterogeneity and are governing functions at the interface of immunity, tissue homeostasis, metabolism, and endocrine signaling. Today the M2 macrophages are identified based on the expression pattern of a set of M2 markers. These markers are transmembrane glycoproteins, scavenger receptors, enzymes, growth factors, hormones, cytokines, and cytokine receptors with diverse and often yet unexplored functions. This review discusses whether these M2 markers can be reliably used to identify M2 macrophages and define their functional subdivisions. Also, it provides an update on the novel signals of the tissue environment and the neuroendocrine system which shape the M2 activation. The possible evolutionary roots of the M2 macrophage functions are also discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Bioact Mater
                Bioact Mater
                Bioactive Materials
                KeAi Publishing
                2452-199X
                03 March 2022
                October 2022
                03 March 2022
                : 16
                : 249-270
                Affiliations
                [a ]Institute of Health Innovation & Technology, National University of Singapore, 117599, Singapore
                [b ]Department of Biomedical Engineering, National University of Singapore, 117583, Singapore
                [c ]Biosafety Level 3 Core Facility, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 117599, Singapore
                [d ]Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 117545, Singapore
                [e ]Infectious Disease Programme, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 117547, Singapore
                [f ]Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, 35 Agency for Science, Technology and Research, 138673, Singapore
                [g ]National University Health System, National University of Singapore, 119228, Singapore
                [h ]Tissue Engineering Programme, National University of Singapore, 117510, Singapore
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. Department of Biomedical Engineering, National University of Singapore, 117583, Singapore. bietkpa@ 123456nus.edu.sg
                [1]

                The authors contributed equally.

                Article
                S2452-199X(22)00081-0
                10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.02.014
                8965851
                35415290
                8f7750c0-1589-4066-a643-67e8d6c7a5c4
                © 2022 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 8 December 2021
                : 10 February 2022
                : 11 February 2022
                Categories
                Review Article

                bacterial infection,orthopaedic implant,microbial resistance,nanomaterial,antimicrobial nanotechnology

                Comments

                Comment on this article