12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Reliability and validity of composite scores from the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery in adults.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study describes psychometric properties of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB) Composite Scores in an adult sample. The NIHTB-CB was designed for use in epidemiologic studies and clinical trials for ages 3 to 85. A total of 268 self-described healthy adults were recruited at four university-based sites, using stratified sampling guidelines to target demographic variability for age (20-85 years), gender, education, and ethnicity. The NIHTB-CB contains seven computer-based instruments assessing five cognitive sub-domains: Language, Executive Function, Episodic Memory, Processing Speed, and Working Memory. Participants completed the NIHTB-CB, corresponding gold standard validation measures selected to tap the same cognitive abilities, and sociodemographic questionnaires. Three Composite Scores were derived for both the NIHTB-CB and gold standard batteries: "Crystallized Cognition Composite," "Fluid Cognition Composite," and "Total Cognition Composite" scores. NIHTB Composite Scores showed acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alphas=0.84 Crystallized, 0.83 Fluid, 0.77 Total), excellent test-retest reliability (r: 0.86-0.92), strong convergent (r: 0.78-0.90) and discriminant (r: 0.19-0.39) validities versus gold standard composites, and expected age effects (r=0.18 crystallized, r=-0.68 fluid, r=-0.26 total). Significant relationships with self-reported prior school difficulties and current health status, employment, and presence of a disability provided evidence of external validity. The NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery Composite Scores have excellent reliability and validity, suggesting they can be used effectively in epidemiologic and clinical studies.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Int Neuropsychol Soc
          Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS
          1469-7661
          1355-6177
          Jul 2014
          : 20
          : 6
          Affiliations
          [1 ] 1Department of Psychiatry,University of California,San Diego,California.
          [2 ] 2Departments of Rehabilitation Medicine,Orthopedic Surgery, and General Medicine,New York University Langone Medical Center,New York; and Spinal Cord Injury,Kessler Foundation,West Orange,New Jersey.
          [3 ] 3Department of Neurology,University of California,Davis,California.
          [4 ] 4Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer's Disease Center and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences,Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine,Chicago,Illinois.
          [5 ] 5Department of Rehabilitation Medicine,University of Washington,Seattle,Washington.
          [6 ] 6Department of Medical Social Sciences,Northwestern University,Chicago,Illinois.
          [7 ] 7San Diego State University/University of California,San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology,San Diego,California.
          [8 ] 8National Institute on Drug Abuse,Rockville,Maryland.
          Article
          S1355617714000241 NIHMS591771
          10.1017/S1355617714000241
          4103963
          24960398
          8f9610b1-07f6-4460-8b17-cd901752ac53
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article