• Record: found
  • Abstract: found
  • Article: not found

Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research?

Research in Nursing & Health

Telephone, Research Design, Reproducibility of Results, Qualitative Research, Psychometrics, standards, methods, Nursing Methodology Research, Nonverbal Communication, Interviews as Topic, Humans, Guidelines as Topic, Evidence-Based Medicine, Data Collection, Cues, Bias (Epidemiology)

Read this article at

      There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.


      Telephone interviews are largely neglected in the qualitative research literature and, when discussed, they are often depicted as a less attractive alternative to face-to-face interviewing. The absence of visual cues via telephone is thought to result in loss of contextual and nonverbal data and to compromise rapport, probing, and interpretation of responses. Yet, telephones may allow respondents to feel relaxed and able to disclose sensitive information, and evidence is lacking that they produce lower quality data. This apparent bias against telephone interviews contrasts with a growing interest in electronic qualitative interviews. Research is needed comparing these modalities, and examining their impact on data quality and their use for studying varying topics and populations. Such studies could contribute evidence-based guidelines for optimizing interview data. 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc

      Related collections

      Author and article information



      Comment on this article