Blog
About

  • Record: found
  • Abstract: found
  • Article: not found

Research training in six selected internal medicine fellowship programs.

Annals of internal medicine

Academic Medical Centers, United States, Specialization, Research, Questionnaires, education, Internal Medicine, Hospitals, Teaching, Fellowships and Scholarships, Certification

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPubMed
Bookmark
      There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

      Abstract

      Effective July 1997, the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) established a research pathway to certification to encourage research training of general internists and subspecialists. To document the current status of research training in six selected subspecialty programs, to examine opportunities available for trainees to undertake formal course work, and to report the percentage of subspecialty programs that might accept research pathway fellows. National Study of Graduate Education in Internal Medicine questionnaires from 1996-1997 and 1997-1998. Programs in internal medicine subspecialties accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. 1163 (84%) and 1094 (79%) directors of internal medicine subspecialty programs in 1996-1997 and 1997-1998, respectively. Survey questions on the amount of time fellows usually spend conducting research and available opportunities to pursue course work leading to an advanced degree. On average, during their last year of training, fellows enrolled in infectious disease, nephrology, endocrinology, and rheumatology programs spent 40% to 50% of their time conducting research, whereas fellows in gastroenterology and cardiology spent 25% to 30% of their time conducting research. Compared with programs sponsored by major teaching hospitals, a greater percentage of programs sponsored by academic medical center hospitals planned to accept persons interested in pursuing the new ABIM Research Pathway (28% vs. 8%) and to provide opportunities for fellows to obtain an advanced degree (60% vs. 14%). Few internal medicine subspecialty programs are currently designed to provide adequate research training as defined by the Institute of Medicine and the ABIM.

      Related collections

      Author and article information

      Journal
      11085843

      Comments

      Comment on this article