26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      PCR-Based Techniques for Leprosy Diagnosis: From the Laboratory to the Clinic

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In leprosy, classic diagnostic tools based on bacillary counts and histopathology have been facing hurdles, especially in distinguishing latent infection from active disease and diagnosing paucibacillary clinical forms. Serological tests and IFN-gamma releasing assays (IGRA) that employ humoral and cellular immune parameters, respectively, are also being used, but recent results indicate that quantitative PCR (qPCR) is a key technique due to its higher sensitivity and specificity. In fact, advances concerning the structure and function of the Mycobacterium leprae genome led to the development of specific PCR-based gene amplification assays for leprosy diagnosis and monitoring of household contacts. Also, based on the validation of point-of-care technologies for M. tuberculosis DNA detection, it is clear that the same advantages of rapid DNA detection could be observed in respect to leprosy. So far, PCR has proven useful in the determination of transmission routes, M. leprae viability, and drug resistance in leprosy. However, PCR has been ascertained to be especially valuable in diagnosing difficult cases like pure neural leprosy (PNL), paucibacillary (PB), and patients with atypical clinical presentation and histopathological features compatible with leprosy. Also, the detection of M. leprae DNA in different samples of the household contacts of leprosy patients is very promising. Although a positive PCR result is not sufficient to establish a causal relationship with disease outcome, quantitation provided by qPCR is clearly capable of indicating increased risk of developing the disease and could alert clinicians to follow these contacts more closely or even define rules for chemoprophylaxis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references88

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Classification of leprosy according to immunity. A five-group system.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Type I interferon suppresses type II interferon-triggered human anti-mycobacterial responses.

            Type I interferons (IFN-α and IFN-β) are important for protection against many viral infections, whereas type II interferon (IFN-γ) is essential for host defense against some bacterial and parasitic pathogens. Study of IFN responses in human leprosy revealed an inverse correlation between IFN-β and IFN-γ gene expression programs. IFN-γ and its downstream vitamin D-dependent antimicrobial genes were preferentially expressed in self-healing tuberculoid lesions and mediated antimicrobial activity against the pathogen Mycobacterium leprae in vitro. In contrast, IFN-β and its downstream genes, including interleukin-10 (IL-10), were induced in monocytes by M. leprae in vitro and preferentially expressed in disseminated and progressive lepromatous lesions. The IFN-γ-induced macrophage vitamin D-dependent antimicrobial peptide response was inhibited by IFN-β and by IL-10, suggesting that the differential production of IFNs contributes to protection versus pathogenesis in some human bacterial infections.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              MicroRNA-21 targets the vitamin D-dependent antimicrobial pathway in leprosy

              Leprosy provides a model to investigate mechanisms of immune regulation in humans, given that the disease forms a clinical-immunological spectrum. Here, we identified 13 miRNAs that were differentially expressed in the lesions of subjects with progressive lepromatous (L-lep) vs. the self-limited tuberculoid (T-lep) disease. Bioinformatic analysis revealed a significant enrichment of L-lep-specific miRNAs that preferentially target key immune genes downregulated in L-lep vs. T-lep lesions. The most differentially expressed miRNA in L-lep lesions, hsa-mir-21, was upregulated in M. leprae-infected monocytes. Hsa-mir-21, by downregulating toll-like receptor 2/1 (TLR2/1)-induced CYP27B1 and IL1B as well as upregulating IL-10, inhibited gene expression of the vitamin D-dependent antimicrobial peptides, CAMP and DEFB4A. Conversely, knockdown of hsa-mir-21 in M. leprae-infected monocytes enhanced expression of CAMP and DEFB4A and restored TLR2/1-mediated antimicrobial activity against M. leprae. Therefore, the ability of M. leprae to upregulate hsa-mir-21 targets multiple genes associated with the immunologically localized disease form, providing an effective mechanism to escape from the vitamin D-dependent antimicrobial pathway.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Negl Trop Dis
                PLoS Negl Trop Dis
                plos
                plosntds
                PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1935-2727
                1935-2735
                April 2014
                10 April 2014
                : 8
                : 4
                : e2655
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Laboratório de Hanseníase, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz - Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
                [2 ]Fundação Alfredo da Matta, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil
                [3 ]Universidade Nilton Lins, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil
                Emory University, United States of America
                Author notes

                The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                [¤]

                Current address: Divisions of Bacteriology and Parasitology, Tulane National Primate Research Center, Covington, Louisiana, United States of America.

                Article
                PNTD-D-13-01228
                10.1371/journal.pntd.0002655
                3983108
                24722358
                8fc3b930-639d-4737-80bd-fb9b5c97f17e
                Copyright @ 2014

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 12 August 2013
                : 7 November 2013
                Page count
                Pages: 8
                Funding
                This study was funded by FAPEAM (Fundação de PEsquisa do Estado do Amazonas): Programa Estratégico de Ciência, Tecnologia & Inovação nas Fundações Estaduais de Saúde - PECTI/AM - Saúde. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Review
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Microbiology
                Medical Microbiology
                Microbial Pathogens
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Dermatology
                Skin Infections
                Diagnostic Medicine
                Epidemiology
                Infectious Diseases
                Bacterial Diseases
                Leprosy
                Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
                Tropical Diseases
                Neglected Tropical Diseases

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                Infectious disease & Microbiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article