28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The association of social relationships and activities with mortality: prospective evidence from the Tecumseh Community Health Study.

      , ,
      American journal of epidemiology
      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The prospective association of social relationships and activities reported during a round of interviews and medical examinations in 1967-1969 with mortality over the succeeding nine to 12 years was examined for a cohort of 2754 adult (aged 35-69 years as of 1967-1969) men and women in the Tecumseh Community Health Study. After adjustments for age and a variety of risk factors for mortality, men reporting a higher levels of social relationships and activities in 1967-1969 were significantly less likely to die during the follow-up period. Trends for women were similar, but generally nonsignificant once age and other risk factors were controlled. These results were invariant across age, occupational, and health status groups. No association was observed between mortality and satisfaction with social relationships or activities. How and why social relationships and activities predict mortality are discussed and identified as important foci for future research.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Am J Epidemiol
          American journal of epidemiology
          Oxford University Press (OUP)
          0002-9262
          0002-9262
          Jul 1982
          : 116
          : 1
          Article
          10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113387
          7102648
          8fc67637-83ed-4ce9-a6c7-c1f6ad4d09cf
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article