33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluating the impact of Brexit on the pharmaceutical industry

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          The UK Pharmaceutical Industry is arguably one of the most important industries to consider in the negotiations following the Brexit vote. Providing tens of thousands of jobs and billions in tax revenue and research investment, the importance of this industry cannot be understated. At stake is the global leadership in the sector, which produces some of the field’s most influential basic science and translation work. However, interruptions and losses may occur at multiple levels, affecting patients, researchers, universities, companies and government.

          Goals

          By understanding the current state of pharmaceutical sector, the potential effect of leaving the European Union (EU) on this successful industry can be better understood. This paper aims to address the priorities for negotiations by collating the analyses of professionals in the field, leading companies and non-EU member states.

          Research methods

          A government healthcare policy advisor and Chief Science Officer (CSO) for a major pharmaceutical firm were consulted to scope the paper. In these discussions, five key areas were identified: contribution, legislative processes, regulatory processes, research and outcomes, commercial risk. Multiple search engines were utilised for selecting relevant material, predominantly PubMed and Google Scholar. To supplement this information, Government documents were located using the “GOV.UK” publications tool, and interviews and commentaries were found through the Google News search function.

          Conclusion

          With thorough investigation of the literature, we propose four foundations in the advancement of negotiations. These prioritise: negotiation of ‘associated country’ status, bilaterally favourable trade agreements, minimal interruption to regulatory bodies and special protection for the movement of workforce in the life sciences industry.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The NIHR at 10: transforming clinical research

            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Better value in the NHS The role of changes in clinical practice

              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              HM Treasury analysis: The long-term economic impact of EU membership and the alternatives

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +447759422005 , fk276@cam.ac.uk
                +447926357248 , cleopollard1@gmail.com
                +447910111484 , director@polygeia.com
                Journal
                J Pharm Policy Pract
                J Pharm Policy Pract
                Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
                BioMed Central (London )
                2052-3211
                4 October 2017
                4 October 2017
                2017
                : 10
                : 32
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000000121885934, GRID grid.5335.0, University of Cambridge, School of Clinical Medicine, ; Cambridge, UK
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2322 6764, GRID grid.13097.3c, King’s College London, ; London, UK
                [3 ]ISNI 0000000121885934, GRID grid.5335.0, University of Cambridge, ; Cambridge, UK
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2113 8111, GRID grid.7445.2, Imperial College London, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, ; London, UK
                [5 ]Polygeia (Global Health Student Think-Tank), Cambridge, UK
                [6 ]Leckhampton House, 37 Grange Road, Cambridge, CB3 9BJ UK
                Article
                120
                10.1186/s40545-017-0120-z
                5628446
                8fcada8e-1727-4bd1-9fff-bde40d11b3b7
                © The Author(s). 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 2 May 2017
                : 26 September 2017
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                brexit,pharma,pharmaceutical,industry,impact of brexit,leaving eu,drug manufacture,employment,workforce,funding

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log