8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Genetic Polymorphism of CHRM2 in COPD: Clinical Significance and Therapeutic Implications : CHRM2 POLYMORPHISMS AND CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a common preventable and treatable disease, characterized by persistent airflow limitation not fully reversible. However, a number of patients with COPD respond to bronchodilator agents. Some studies have shown polymorphisms in the b2-adrenergic (ADRb2) and muscarinic M2 and M3 receptors (CHRM) that may participate in the modulation of the receptor responses. This study was designed to investigate the existence and the role of adrenergic and muscarinic receptor polymorphisms and their functional impact in COPD. Eighty-two patients with COPD and 17 healthy smokers were recruited and screened for ADRb2 (T164I and R175R), for CHRM2 (rs1824024) and for CHRM3 (-513C/A and -492C/T). Among the polymorphisms studied our results was not able to demonstrate statistically significant association between the polymorphisms studied and COPD risk. Contrarily, we identified, in our COPD population, a significant association with the CHRM2 (rs1824024) polymorphism and disease severity, with lower lung function test values, frequent exacerbations, and poor response to anti-cholinergic drugs. These results suggest the potential role of receptor polymorphism assessment to discriminate newly COPD phenotypes. J. Cell. Physiol. 231: 1745-1751, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Muscarinic receptor signaling in the pathophysiology of asthma and COPD

          Anticholinergics are widely used for the treatment of COPD, and to a lesser extent for asthma. Primarily used as bronchodilators, they reverse the action of vagally derived acetylcholine on airway smooth muscle contraction. Recent novel studies suggest that the effects of anticholinergics likely extend far beyond inducing bronchodilation, as the novel anticholinergic drug tiotropium bromide can effectively inhibit accelerated decline of lung function in COPD patients. Vagal tone is increased in airway inflammation associated with asthma and COPD; this results from exaggerated acetylcholine release and enhanced expression of downstream signaling components in airway smooth muscle. Vagally derived acetylcholine also regulates mucus production in the airways. A number of recent research papers also indicate that acetylcholine, acting through muscarinic receptors, may in part regulate pathological changes associated with airway remodeling. Muscarinic receptor signalling regulates airway smooth muscle thickening and differentiation, both in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, acetylcholine and its synthesizing enzyme, choline acetyl transferase (ChAT), are ubiquitously expressed throughout the airways. Most notably epithelial cells and inflammatory cells generate acetylcholine, and express functional muscarinic receptors. Interestingly, recent work indicates the expression and function of muscarinic receptors on neutrophils is increased in COPD. Considering the potential broad role for endogenous acetylcholine in airway biology, this review summarizes established and novel aspects of muscarinic receptor signaling in relation to the pathophysiology and treatment of asthma and COPD.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Lung function testing: selection of reference values and interpretative strategies.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Comorbidity, hospitalization, and mortality in COPD: results from a longitudinal study.

              We evaluated comorbidity, hospitalization, and mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), with special attention to risk factors for frequent hospitalizations (more than three during the follow-up period), and prognostic factors for death. Two hundred eighty-eight consecutive COPD patients admitted to respiratory medicine wards in four hospitals for acute exacerbation were enrolled from 1999 to 2000 in a prospective longitudinal study, and followed up until December 2007. The Charlson index without age was used to quantify comorbidity. Clinical and biochemical parameters and pulmonary function data were evaluated as potential predictive factors of mortality and hospitalization. FEV(1), RV, PaO(2), and PaCO(2) were used to develop an index of respiratory functional impairment (REFI index). Hypertension was the most common comorbidity (64.2%), followed by chronic renal failure (26.3%), diabetes mellitus (25.3%), and cardiac diseases (22.1%). Main causes of hospitalization were exacerbation of COPD (41.2%) and cardiovascular disease (34.4%). Most of the 56 deaths (19.4%) were due to cardiovascular disease (67.8%). Mortality risk depended on age, current smoking, FEV(1), PaO(2), the REFI index, the presence of cor pulmonale, ischemic heart disease, and lung cancer. Number and length of hospital admissions depended on the degree of dyspnea and REFI index. The correct management of respiratory disease and the implementation of aggressive strategies to prevent or treat comorbidities are necessary for better care of COPD patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Cellular Physiology
                J. Cell. Physiol.
                Wiley-Blackwell
                00219541
                August 2016
                August 15 2016
                : 231
                : 8
                : 1745-1751
                Article
                10.1002/jcp.25277
                26633752
                8feadb4c-821b-4960-bc75-0fd53e96a3ca
                © 2016

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article