+1 Recommend
0 collections
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The internal transcribed spacers (ITS1 and ITS2) of the rDNA differentiates the bark beetle forest pests Tomicus destruens and T. piniperda.

      Insect Molecular Biology
      Animals, Asia, Base Sequence, Beetles, genetics, DNA, Intergenic, DNA, Ribosomal, Europe, Molecular Sequence Data, Plant Bark, parasitology, Restriction Mapping, Sequence Alignment, Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid, Species Specificity, Trees

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.


          The bark beetles species Tomicus destruens and T. piniperda constitute one of the main pests of European and Asian forests. T. destruens has been thought to be the same species as T. piniperda by some authors. A rapid PCR-based method using internal transcribed spacers (ITS1 and ITS2) of the ribosomal DNA has been developed in order to identifying these two species. We have studied differences in the size of the ITS1, and differences in the sequence and restriction patterns of the ITS2 in 75 individuals of both species. The results indicate a size difference of about 100 bp in the ITS1 of T. destruens and T. piniperda. The size of the ITS2 spacer is similar in both species (approximately 600 bp). However, the sequence is consistently different between T. destruens and T. piniperda in all populations analysed, showing some characteristic indels. Differences in the restriction target in both species for the enzymes HincII and DraI produce different band patterns in agarose NuSieve 5% gel electrophoresis. These data suggest the validity of T. destruens as a phylogenetically differentiated entity from T. piniperda. The phylogenetic analysis of a 789 bp fragment of the 3' end of the cytochrome oxidase I gene (COI) agrees with the two groupings obtained with the ITS2, showing a phylogenetic clustering rather than a phylogeographic structure.

          Related collections

          Author and article information


          Comment on this article