0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Use of Cognitive Aids: Results from a National Survey among Anaesthesia Providers in France and Canada

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          The use of cognitive aids (CAs) during critical events is thought to be useful. However, whether CAs are known and used by French and Canadian anaesthesia providers is not clear.

          Methods

          A survey was emailed to French and Canadian anaesthesia providers in 2017 through their respective national societies. It consisted of 23 questions about the participants' demographics and their knowledge, use, and impact of CAs. A second survey was sent to French simulation centres.

          Results

          912 responses were recorded in France and 278 in Canada (overall response rate: 7% and 11%, respectively). Among the respondents, 700/899 in France (78%) versus 249/273 (91%) in Canada were familiar with the concept of cognitive dysfunction during a crisis and 501/893 (56%) in France versus 250/271 (92%) in Canada knew the concept of CAs. Amongst those respondents who knew about CAs, 189/492 (38%) in France versus 108/244 (44%) in Canada stated that they had already used a CA in real life and 225/493 (45%) in France versus 126/245 (51%) in Canada had received training in their use. Simulation was the principal modality for training in 150/225 (67%) of cases in France versus 47/126 (37%) in Canada. Among the 28/50 French simulation centres which responded (2018 January), 27 organised sessions in anaesthesia and 22 used CAs.

          Conclusion

          CAs were better known in Canada than in France, but their actual use in real life was low in both countries. Simulation appears to play a potentially important role training anaesthesia providers in the use of CAs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The use of cognitive aids during emergencies in anesthesia: a review of the literature.

          Cognitive aids are prompts designed to help users complete a task or series of tasks. They may take the form of posters, flowcharts, checklists, or even mnemonics. It has been suggested that the use of cognitive aids improves performance and patient outcomes during anesthetic emergencies; however, a systematic assessment of the evidence is lacking. The aim of this literature review was to determine (1) whether cognitive aids improve performance of individuals and teams and (2) whether recommendations can be made for future cognitive aid design, testing, and implementation. Medical, nursing, and psychology databases were searched using broad criteria to find cognitive aids that have been reported in the literature for use in anesthetic emergencies. The reference lists of the articles selected for review were also screened to identify additional studies. Selected articles that described the evaluation of cognitive aids used in anesthetic emergencies were reviewed to determine how the content of the aid was derived, how the design was evaluated, and the success of the aid in improving technical and team performance. The search yielded 22 cognitive aids developed to support clinicians during anesthetic emergencies that had been evaluated in 23 studies. Ten studies using simulation suggested that technical performance improves with the use of cognitive aids in some anesthetic emergencies such as malignant hyperthermia, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and airway management. However, in 3 of the simulator-based evaluations, participants had either no improvement or took longer to diagnose and treat and made more incorrect diagnoses. Four studies investigated the effect of the aids on teamwork with differing conclusions. One study suggested improved participants' coordination patterns and one found aids improved their decision-making scores, but 2 other studies indicated that there was no improvement and even provided evidence of reduced levels of team communication when teams used a cognitive aid in simulated conditions. The designs of cognitive aids were rarely considered. Education may compensate for a poorly designed aid, but only by ingraining correct actions for situations in which the aid provides little or no guidance. Cognitive aids should continue to be developed from established clinical guidelines where guidelines exist. They would also benefit from more extensive simulation-based usability testing before use. Further evidence is required to explore the effects of cognitive aids in anesthetic emergencies, how they affect team function, and their design considerations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Crisis resource management and teamwork training in anaesthesia.

            D.M. Gaba (2010)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Use of cognitive aids in a simulated anesthetic crisis.

              We evaluated empirically the extent to which the use of a cognitive aid during a high-fidelity simulation of a malignant hyperthermia (MH) event facilitated the correct and prompt treatment of MH. We reviewed the management of 48 simulated adult MH scenarios; 24 involving CA 1 and 24 involving CA 2 residents. In the CA 1 group, 19 of the 24 teams (79%) used a cognitive aid, but only 8 of the 19 teams used it frequently or extensively. In the CA 2 group, 18 of the 23 teams (78%) used a cognitive aid but only 6 of them used it frequently or extensively. The frequency of cognitive aid use correlated significantly with the MH treatment score for the CA 1 group (Spearman r = 0.59, P < 0.01) and CA 2 group (Spearman r = 0.68, P < 0.001). The teams that performed the best in treating MH used a cognitive aid extensively throughout the simulation. Although the effect was less pronounced in the more experienced CA 2 cohort, there was still a strong correlation between performance and cognitive aid use. We were able to show a strong correlation between the use of a cognitive aid and the correct treatment of MH.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Anesthesiol Res Pract
                Anesthesiol Res Pract
                ARP
                Anesthesiology Research and Practice
                Hindawi
                1687-6962
                1687-6970
                2020
                6 May 2020
                : 2020
                : 1346051
                Affiliations
                1Centre de simulation LabForSIMS, Faculté de médecine Paris Saclay, 94275 Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
                2Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, CHU Bicêtre, 94275 Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
                3Comité Analyse et Maîtrise du Risque, Société Française d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation (SFAR), Paris, France
                4Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, CHU Toulouse, France et University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
                Author notes

                Academic Editor: Davide Cattano

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2291-0315
                Article
                10.1155/2020/1346051
                7225858
                900f1dad-a640-4e7b-8bce-10aa8d7a5ac8
                Copyright © 2020 Antonia Blanié et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 21 January 2020
                : 9 April 2020
                Categories
                Research Article

                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                Anesthesiology & Pain management

                Comments

                Comment on this article