14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Health-related quality of life advantage of long-acting injectable antipsychotic treatment for schizophrenia: a time trade-off study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          This study was undertaken to estimate utility values for alternative treatment intervals for long acting antipsychotic intramuscular injections for the treatment of schizophrenia.

          Methods

          Vignettes were developed using the published literature and an iterative consultation process with expert clinicians and patient representative groups. Four vignettes were developed. The first was a vignette of relapsed/untreated schizophrenia. The other three vignettes presented a standardised picture of well-managed schizophrenia with variations in the intervals between injections: once every 2-weeks, 4-weeks and 3-months. A standardised time trade off (TTO) approach was used to obtain utility values for the vignettes. As a societal perspective was sought, a representative sample of individuals from across the community (Sydney, Australia) was recruited. Ninety-eight people completed the TTO interview. The vignettes were presented in random order to prevent possible ordering effects.

          Results

          A clear pattern of increasing utility was observed with increasing time between injections. Untreated schizophrenia was rated as very poor health-related quality of life with a mean (median) utility of 0.27 (0.20). The treated health states were rated at much higher utilities and were statistically significantly different ( p < 0.001) from each other: (1) 2-weekly: mean (median) utility = 0.61 (0.65); (2) 4-weekly: mean (median) utility = 0.65 (0.70); (3) 3-monthly: mean (median) utility = 0.70 (0.75).

          Conclusions

          This study has provided robust data indicating that approximately a 0.05 utility difference exists between treatment options, with the highest utility assigned to 3-monthly injections.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Schizophrenia: manifestations, incidence and course in different cultures. A World Health Organization ten-country study.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Quality of life related to fear of falling and hip fracture in older women: a time trade off study.

            To estimate the utility (preference for health) associated with hip fracture and fear of falling among older women. Quality of life survey with the time trade off technique. The technique derives an estimate of preference for health states by finding the point at which respondents show no preference between a longer but lower quality of life and a shorter time in full health. A randomised trial of external hip protectors for older women at risk of hip fracture. 194 women aged >/= 75 years enrolled in the randomised controlled trial or who were eligible for the trial but refused completed a quality of life interview face to face. Respondents were asked to rate their own health by using the Euroqol instrument and then rate three health states (fear of falling, a "good" hip fracture, and a "bad" hip fracture) by using time trade off technique. On an interval scale between 0 (death) and 1 (full health), a "bad" hip fracture (which results in admission to a nursing home) was valued at 0.05; a "good" hip fracture (maintaining independent living in the community) 0.31, and fear of falling 0.67. Of women surveyed, 80% would rather be dead (utility=0) than experience the loss of independence and quality of life that results from a bad hip fracture and subsequent admission to a nursing home. The differences in mean utility weights between the trial groups and the refusers were not significant. A test-retest study on 36 women found that the results were reliable with correlation coefficients within classes ranging from 0.61 to 0.88. Among older women who have exceeded average life expectancy, quality of life is profoundly threatened by falls and hip fractures. Older women place a very high marginal value on their health. Any loss of ability to live independently in the community has a considerable detrimental effect on their quality of life.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A Comparison of Clinically Important Differences in Health-Related Quality of Life for Patients with Chronic Lung Disease, Asthma, or Heart Disease

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Health Qual Life Outcomes
                Health Qual Life Outcomes
                Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
                BioMed Central
                1477-7525
                2012
                2 April 2012
                : 10
                : 35
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Public Health Innovation, Population Health Strategic Research Centre, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, VIC, Australia 3125
                [2 ]Centre for Health Policy, Programs and Economics, University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Carlton, VIC, Australia 3053
                [3 ]Janssen-Cilag Pty Ltd, 1-5 Khartoum Road, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia 2113
                [4 ]PRIMA Consulting Group Pt Ltd, Suite 1A, Level 2, 802 Pacific Hwy, Gordon, NSW, Australia 2072
                Article
                1477-7525-10-35
                10.1186/1477-7525-10-35
                3369822
                22472127
                901cabbe-3796-4043-a715-107e08e87d52
                Copyright ©2012 Osborne et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 24 September 2011
                : 2 April 2012
                Categories
                Research

                Health & Social care
                antipsychotic,quality of life,treatment interval,time-trade-off,long-acting injection,schizophrenia

                Comments

                Comment on this article