101
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    3
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Objective Assessment and Design Improvement of a Staring, Sparse Transducer Array by the Spatial Crosstalk Matrix for 3D Photoacoustic Tomography

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Accurate reconstruction of 3D photoacoustic (PA) images requires detection of photoacoustic signals from many angles. Several groups have adopted staring ultrasound arrays, but assessment of array performance has been limited. We previously reported on a method to calibrate a 3D PA tomography (PAT) staring array system and analyze system performance using singular value decomposition (SVD). The developed SVD metric, however, was impractical for large system matrices, which are typical of 3D PAT problems. The present study consisted of two main objectives. The first objective aimed to introduce the crosstalk matrix concept to the field of PAT for system design. Figures-of-merit utilized in this study were root mean square error, peak signal-to-noise ratio, mean absolute error, and a three dimensional structural similarity index, which were derived between the normalized spatial crosstalk matrix and the identity matrix. The applicability of this approach for 3D PAT was validated by observing the response of the figures-of-merit in relation to well-understood PAT sampling characteristics (i.e. spatial and temporal sampling rate). The second objective aimed to utilize the figures-of-merit to characterize and improve the performance of a near-spherical staring array design. Transducer arrangement, array radius, and array angular coverage were the design parameters examined. We observed that the performance of a 129-element staring transducer array for 3D PAT could be improved by selection of optimal values of the design parameters. The results suggested that this formulation could be used to objectively characterize 3D PAT system performance and would enable the development of efficient strategies for system design optimization.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity.

          Objective methods for assessing perceptual image quality traditionally attempted to quantify the visibility of errors (differences) between a distorted image and a reference image using a variety of known properties of the human visual system. Under the assumption that human visual perception is highly adapted for extracting structural information from a scene, we introduce an alternative complementary framework for quality assessment based on the degradation of structural information. As a specific example of this concept, we develop a Structural Similarity Index and demonstrate its promise through a set of intuitive examples, as well as comparison to both subjective ratings and state-of-the-art objective methods on a database of images compressed with JPEG and JPEG2000.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Photoacoustic imaging in cancer detection, diagnosis, and treatment guidance.

            Imaging modalities play an important role in the clinical management of cancer, including screening, diagnosis, treatment planning and therapy monitoring. Owing to increased research efforts during the past two decades, photoacoustic imaging (a non-ionizing, noninvasive technique capable of visualizing optical absorption properties of tissue at reasonable depth, with the spatial resolution of ultrasound) has emerged. Ultrasound-guided photoacoustics is noted for its ability to provide in vivo morphological and functional information about the tumor within the surrounding tissue. With the recent advent of targeted contrast agents, photoacoustics is now also capable of in vivo molecular imaging, thus facilitating further molecular and cellular characterization of cancer. This review examines the role of photoacoustics and photoacoustic-augmented imaging techniques in comprehensive cancer detection, diagnosis and treatment guidance.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Laser optoacoustic imaging system for detection of breast cancer.

              We designed, fabricated and tested the laser optoacoustic imaging system for breast cancer detection (LOIS-64), which fuses optical and acoustic imaging techniques in one modality by utilizing pulsed optical illumination and ultrawide-band ultrasonic detection of resulting optoacoustic (OA) signals. The system was designed to image a single breast slice in craniocaudal or mediolateral projection with an arc-shaped array of 64 ultrawide-band acoustic transducers. The system resolution on breast phantoms was at least 0.5 mm. The single-channel sensitivity of 1.66 mVPa was estimated to be sufficient for single-pulse imaging of 6 to 11 mm tumors through the whole imaging slice of the breast. The implemented signal processing using the wavelet transform allowed significant reduction of the low-frequency (LF) acoustic noise, allowed localization of the optoacoustic signals from tumors, and enhanced the contrast and sharpened the boundaries of the optoacoustic images of the tumors. During the preliminary clinical studies on 27 patients, the LOIS-64 was able to visualize 18 out of 20 malignant lesions suspected from mammography and ultrasound images and confirmed by the biopsy performed after the optoacoustic tomography (OAT) procedure.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                15 April 2015
                2015
                : 10
                : 4
                : e0124759
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Imaging Program, Lawson Health Research Institute, St. Joseph’s Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada
                [2 ]Department of Medical Biophysics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
                Shenzhen institutes of advanced technology, CHINA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors received funding from MultiMagnetics Inc. and affirm that this does not alter their adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: PW JJLC. Performed the experiments: PW IK AR. Analyzed the data: PW IK AR JJLC. Wrote the paper: PW IK AR JJLC.

                ‡ These authors also contributed equally to this work.

                Article
                PONE-D-14-40563
                10.1371/journal.pone.0124759
                4398465
                25875177
                903179e1-96bb-419e-9ead-c735d10c2bf9
                Copyright @ 2015

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

                History
                : 9 September 2014
                : 5 March 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 10, Tables: 0, Pages: 25
                Funding
                PW and IK were supported by the Translational Breast Cancer Research Unit ( http://www.lhsc.on.ca/Research_Training/LRCP/Research_Groups/TranslationalBreastCancerResearch.htm) as well as The University of Western Ontario (WGRS)( http://grad.uwo.ca/current_students/student_finances/wgrs.html). PW was also supported by the Ontario Graduate Scholarship ( https://osap.gov.on.ca/OSAPPortal/en/A-ZListofAid/PRD19842319.html). AR was supported by WGRS, the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR)( http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/193.html), and the CIHR strategic training program in Cancer Research and Technology Transfer ( http://www.uwo.ca/oncology/CIHR/STP/). Research funding was provided by the Canada Foundation for Innovation (ID#: 29864), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (ID#: 312232-2009)( http://www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca/index_eng.asp), the Canadian Institute of Health Research (ID#: 220298)( http://www.innovation.ca/), The Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation’s Ontario Research Fund (ID#: RE-03-051)( https://www.ontario.ca/business-and-economy/ontario-research-fund-research-excellence) through the Ontario Preclinical Imaging Consortium (OPIC), and the Lawson Health Research Institute (LHRI). MultiMagnetics Inc. provided matching funds with respect to ORF-OPIC. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article