8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      Are you tired of sifting through news that doesn't interest you?
      Personalize your Karger newsletter today and get only the news that matters to you!

      Sign up

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Critical Comparison of Vasotonometric (Réthy) and Ophthalmodynamometric Measurements

      research-article
      , ,
      Ophthalmic Research
      S. Karger AG
      Vasotonometry, Ophthalmodynamometry, Data processing, Statistics

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          These investigations were performed to compare two different methods – ophthalmodynamometry and vasotonometry (Réthy). Vasotonometric measurements gave a coefficient of correlation of only r = 0.64 or 0.69, for the interdependence of brachial and ophthalmic blood pressure, respectively; the values obtained were unphysiologically low. These facts indicate a considerable technical imperfection in the method; however, it can be improved.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          ORE
          Ophthalmic Res
          10.1159/issn.0030-3747
          Ophthalmic Research
          S. Karger AG
          0030-3747
          1423-0259
          1973
          1973
          09 December 2009
          : 5
          : 5
          : 300-307
          Affiliations
          Clinical Institute for Experimental Ophthalmology of the University (Director: Prof. E. Weigelin), Bonn
          Article
          266076 Ophthal Res 1973;5:300–307
          10.1159/000266076
          904db391-d358-4a81-b564-d2903d1792e1
          © 1973 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          History
          : 16 March 1973
          : 12 April 1973
          Page count
          Pages: 8
          Categories
          Paper

          Vision sciences,Ophthalmology & Optometry,Pathology
          Vasotonometry,Data processing,Statistics,Ophthalmodynamometry

          Comments

          Comment on this article