30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Next-generation, personalised, model-based critical care medicine: a state-of-the art review of in silico virtual patient models, methods, and cohorts, and how to validation them

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Critical care, like many healthcare areas, is under a dual assault from significantly increasing demographic and economic pressures. Intensive care unit (ICU) patients are highly variable in response to treatment, and increasingly aging populations mean ICUs are under increasing demand and their cohorts are increasingly ill. Equally, patient expectations are growing, while the economic ability to deliver care to all is declining. Better, more productive care is thus the big challenge. One means to that end is personalised care designed to manage the significant inter- and intra-patient variability that makes the ICU patient difficult. Thus, moving from current “ one size fits all” protocolised care to adaptive, model-based “ one method fits all” personalised care could deliver the required step change in the quality, and simultaneously the productivity and cost, of care. Computer models of human physiology are a unique tool to personalise care, as they can couple clinical data with mathematical methods to create subject-specific models and virtual patients to design new, personalised and more optimal protocols, as well as to guide care in real-time. They rely on identifying time varying patient-specific parameters in the model that capture inter- and intra-patient variability, the difference between patients and the evolution of patient condition. Properly validated, virtual patients represent the real patients, and can be used in silico to test different protocols or interventions, or in real-time to guide care. Hence, the underlying models and methods create the foundation for next generation care, as well as a tool for safely and rapidly developing personalised treatment protocols over large virtual cohorts using virtual trials. This review examines the models and methods used to create virtual patients. Specifically, it presents the models types and structures used and the data required. It then covers how to validate the resulting virtual patients and trials, and how these virtual trials can help design and optimise clinical trial. Links between these models and higher order, more complex physiome models are also discussed. In each section, it explores the progress reported up to date, especially on core ICU therapies in glycemic, circulatory and mechanical ventilation management, where high cost and frequency of occurrence provide a significant opportunity for model-based methods to have measurable clinical and economic impact. The outcomes are readily generalised to other areas of medical care.

          Related collections

          Most cited references292

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Daily cost of an intensive care unit day: the contribution of mechanical ventilation.

          To quantify the mean daily cost of intensive care, identify key factors associated with increased cost, and determine the incremental cost of mechanical ventilation during a day in the intensive care unit. Retrospective cohort analysis using data from NDCHealth's Hospital Patient Level Database. A total of 253 geographically diverse U.S. hospitals. The study included 51,009 patients >/=18 yrs of age admitted to an intensive care unit between October 1, 2002, and December 31, 2002. None. Days of intensive care and mechanical ventilation were identified using billing data, and daily costs were calculated as the sum of daily charges multiplied by hospital-specific cost-to-charge ratios. Cost data are presented as mean (+/-sd). Incremental daily cost of mechanical ventilation was calculated using log-linear regression, adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics. Approximately 36% of identified patients were mechanically ventilated at some point during their intensive care unit stay. Mechanically ventilated patients were older (63.5 yrs vs. 61.7 yrs, p < .0001) and more likely to be male (56.1% vs. 51.8%, p < 0.0001), compared with patients who were not mechanically ventilated, and required mechanical ventilation for a mean duration of 5.6 days +/- 9.6. Mean intensive care unit cost and length of stay were 31,574 +/- 42,570 dollars and 14.4 days +/- 15.8 for patients requiring mechanical ventilation and 12,931 +/- 20,569 dollars and 8.5 days +/- 10.5 for those not requiring mechanical ventilation. Daily costs were greatest on intensive care unit day 1 (mechanical ventilation, 10,794 dollars; no mechanical ventilation, 6,667 dollars), decreased on day 2 (mechanical ventilation:, 4,796 dollars; no mechanical ventilation, 3,496 dollars), and became stable after day 3 (mechanical ventilation, 3,968 dollars; no mechanical ventilation, 3,184 dollars). Adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics, the mean incremental cost of mechanical ventilation in intensive care unit patients was 1,522 dollars per day (p < .001). Intensive care unit costs are highest during the first 2 days of admission, stabilizing at a lower level thereafter. Mechanical ventilation is associated with significantly higher daily costs for patients receiving treatment in the intensive care unit throughout their entire intensive care unit stay. Interventions that result in reduced intensive care unit length of stay and/or duration of mechanical ventilation could lead to substantial reductions in total inpatient cost.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Variability of blood glucose concentration and short-term mortality in critically ill patients.

            Intensive insulin therapy may reduce mortality and morbidity in selected surgical patients. Intensive insulin therapy also reduced the SD of blood glucose concentration, an accepted measure of variability. There is no information on the possible significance of variability in glucose concentration. The methods included extraction of blood glucose values from electronically stored biochemical databases and of data on patient's characteristics, clinical features, and outcome from electronically stored prospectively collected patient databases; calculation of SD of glucose as a marker of variability and of several indices of glucose control in each patient; and statistical assessment of the relation between these variables and intensive care unit mortality. There were 168,337 blood glucose measurements in the study cohort of 7,049 critically ill patients (4.2 hourly measurements on average). The mean +/- SD of blood glucose concentration was 1.7 +/- 1.3 mM in survivors and 2.3 +/- 1.6 mM in nonsurvivors (P < 0.001). Using multiple variable logistic regression analysis, both mean and SD of blood glucose were significantly associated with intensive care unit mortality (P < 0.001; odds ratios [per 1 mM] 1.23 and 1.27, respectively) and hospital mortality (P < 0.001 and P = 0.013; odds ratios [per 1 mM] 1.21 and 1.18, respectively). The SD of glucose concentration is a significant independent predictor of intensive care unit and hospital mortality. Decreasing the variability of blood glucose concentration might be an important aspect of glucose management.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Computation of aortic flow from pressure in humans using a nonlinear, three-element model.

              We computed aortic flow pulsations from arterial pressure by simulating a nonlinear, time-varying three-element model of aortic input impedance. The model elements represent aortic characteristic impedance, arterial compliance, and systemic vascular resistance. Parameter values for the first two elements were computed from a published, age-dependent, aortic pressure-area relationship (G. J. Langewouters et al. J. Biomech. 17:425-435, 1984). Peripheral resistance was predicted from mean pressure and model mean flow. Model flow pulsations from aortic pressure showed the visual aspects of an aortic flow curve. For evaluation we compared model mean flow from radial arterial pressure with thermodilution cardiac output estimations, 76 times, in eight open heart surgical patients. The pooled mean difference was +7%, the SD 22%. After using one comparison per patient to calibrate the model, however, we followed quantitative changes in cardiac output that occurred either during changes in the state of the patient or subsequent to vasoactive drugs. The mean deviation from thermodilution cardiac output was +2%, the SD 8%. Given these small errors the method could monitor cardiac output continuously.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Geoff.chase@canterbury.ac.nz
                jean-charles.preiser@erasme.ulb.ac.be
                chiew.yeong.shiong@monash.edu
                Geoff.shaw@cdhb.health.nz
                bbenyo@iit.bme.hu
                knut.moeller@hs-furtwangen.de
                m.tawhai@auckland.ac.nz
                tdesaive@ulg.ac.be
                Journal
                Biomed Eng Online
                Biomed Eng Online
                BioMedical Engineering OnLine
                BioMed Central (London )
                1475-925X
                20 February 2018
                20 February 2018
                2018
                : 17
                : 24
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2179 1970, GRID grid.21006.35, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Centre for Bio-Engineering, , University of Canterbury, ; Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0000 8571 829X, GRID grid.412157.4, Department of Intensive Care, , Erasme University of Hospital, ; 1070 Brussels, Belgium
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0805 7253, GRID grid.4861.b, GIGA In Silico Medicine, University of Liege, ; 4000 Liege, Belgium
                [4 ]GRID grid.440425.3, Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, , Monash University Malaysia, ; 47500 Selangor, Malaysia
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0614 1349, GRID grid.414299.3, Department of Intensive Care, , Christchurch Hospital, ; Christchurch, New Zealand
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2180 0451, GRID grid.6759.d, Department of Control Engineering and Information Technology, , Budapest University of Technology and Economics, ; Budapest, Hungary
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0601 6589, GRID grid.21051.37, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Institute of Technical Medicine, , Furtwangen University, ; Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany
                [8 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0372 3343, GRID grid.9654.e, Auckland Bioengineering Institute, , University of Auckland, ; Auckland, New Zealand
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9989-4849
                Article
                455
                10.1186/s12938-018-0455-y
                5819676
                29463246
                9059244d-a4e4-4707-ac7a-3077a1ca7f1c
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 9 October 2017
                : 12 February 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001509, Royal Society of New Zealand;
                Award ID: JCF-15-UOC-013
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: New Zealand National Science Challenge
                Award ID: CRS-S3-2016
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Biomedical engineering
                Biomedical engineering

                Comments

                Comment on this article