17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Bienestar Subjetivo y Satisfacción Vital del Profesorado

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Satisfaction With Life Scale.

          This article reports the development and validation of a scale to measure global life satisfaction, the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS). Among the various components of subjective well-being, the SWLS is narrowly focused to assess global life satisfaction and does not tap related constructs such as positive affect or loneliness. The SWLS is shown to have favorable psychometric properties, including high internal consistency and high temporal reliability. Scores on the SWLS correlate moderately to highly with other measures of subjective well-being, and correlate predictably with specific personality characteristics. It is noted that the SWLS is Suited for use with different age groups, and other potential uses of the scale are discussed.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being.

            Carol Ryff (1989)
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being.

              Well-being is a complex construct that concerns optimal experience and functioning. Current research on well-being has been derived from two general perspectives: the hedonic approach, which focuses on happiness and defines well-being in terms of pleasure attainment and pain avoidance; and the eudaimonic approach, which focuses on meaning and self-realization and defines well-being in terms of the degree to which a person is fully functioning. These two views have given rise to different research foci and a body of knowledge that is in some areas divergent and in others complementary. New methodological developments concerning multilevel modeling and construct comparisons are also allowing researchers to formulate new questions for the field. This review considers research from both perspectives concerning the nature of well-being, its antecedents, and its stability across time and culture.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación
                reice
                Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad Autonoma de Madrid
                16964713
                2018
                2018
                : 16.1
                : 2018
                Article
                10.15366/reice2018.16.1.007
                9071e157-7d66-45c2-ba40-91b7a67482fc
                © 2018
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log