18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Characteristics of Indigenous primary health care service delivery models: a systematic scoping review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Indigenous populations have poorer health outcomes compared to their non-Indigenous counterparts. The evolution of Indigenous primary health care services arose from mainstream health services being unable to adequately meet the needs of Indigenous communities and Indigenous peoples often being excluded and marginalised from mainstream health services. Part of the solution has been to establish Indigenous specific primary health care services, for and managed by Indigenous peoples. There are a number of reasons why Indigenous primary health care services are more likely than mainstream services to improve the health of Indigenous communities. Their success is partly due to the fact that they often provide comprehensive programs that incorporate treatment and management, prevention and health promotion, as well as addressing the social determinants of health. However, there are gaps in the evidence base including the characteristics that contribute to the success of Indigenous primary health care services in providing comprehensive primary health care. This systematic scoping review aims to identify the characteristics of Indigenous primary health care service delivery models.

          Method

          This systematic scoping review was led by an Aboriginal researcher, using the Joanna Briggs Institute Scoping Review Methodology. All published peer-reviewed and grey literature indexed in PubMed, EBSCO CINAHL, Embase, Informit, Mednar, and Trove databases from September 1978 to May 2015 were reviewed for inclusion. Studies were included if they describe the characteristics of service delivery models implemented within an Indigenous primary health care service. Sixty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted and then thematically analysed to identify the characteristics of Indigenous PHC service delivery models.

          Results

          Culture was the most prominent characteristic underpinning all of the other seven characteristics which were identified – accessible health services, community participation, continuous quality improvement, culturally appropriate and skilled workforce, flexible approach to care, holistic health care, and self-determination and empowerment.

          Conclusion

          While the eight characteristics were clearly distinguishable within the review, the interdependence between each characteristic was also evident. These findings were used to develop a new Indigenous PHC Service Delivery Model, which clearly demonstrates some of the unique characteristics of Indigenous specific models.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s12992-018-0332-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references83

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews.

          Reviews of primary research are becoming more common as evidence-based practice gains recognition as the benchmark for care, and the number of, and access to, primary research sources has grown. One of the newer review types is the 'scoping review'. In general, scoping reviews are commonly used for 'reconnaissance' - to clarify working definitions and conceptual boundaries of a topic or field. Scoping reviews are therefore particularly useful when a body of literature has not yet been comprehensively reviewed, or exhibits a complex or heterogeneous nature not amenable to a more precise systematic review of the evidence. While scoping reviews may be conducted to determine the value and probable scope of a full systematic review, they may also be undertaken as exercises in and of themselves to summarize and disseminate research findings, to identify research gaps, and to make recommendations for the future research. This article briefly introduces the reader to scoping reviews, how they are different to systematic reviews, and why they might be conducted. The methodology and guidance for the conduct of systematic scoping reviews outlined below was developed by members of the Joanna Briggs Institute and members of five Joanna Briggs Collaborating Centres.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Organizing care for patients with chronic illness.

            Usual medical care often fails to meet the needs of chronically ill patients, even in managed, integrated delivery systems. The medical literature suggests strategies to improve outcomes in these patients. Effective interventions tend to fall into one of five areas: the use of evidence-based, planned care; reorganization of practice systems and provider roles; improved patient self-management support; increased access to expertise; and greater availability of clinical information. The challenge is to organize these components into an integrated system of chronic illness care. Whether this can be done most efficiently and effectively in primary care practice rather than requiring specialized systems of care remains unanswered.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Indigenous health part 1: determinants and disease patterns.

              The world's almost 400 million Indigenous people have low standards of health. This poor health is associated with poverty, malnutrition, overcrowding, poor hygiene, environmental contamination, and prevalent infections. Inadequate clinical care and health promotion, and poor disease prevention services aggravate this situation. Some Indigenous groups, as they move from traditional to transitional and modern lifestyles, are rapidly acquiring lifestyle diseases, such as obesity, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes, and physical, social, and mental disorders linked to misuse of alcohol and of other drugs. Correction of these inequities needs increased awareness, political commitment, and recognition rather than governmental denial and neglect of these serious and complex problems. Indigenous people should be encouraged, trained, and enabled to become increasingly involved in overcoming these challenges.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +61 8 8128 4227 , stephen.harfield@sahmri.com
                carol.davy@sahmri.com
                alexa.mcarthur@adelaide.edu.au
                zachary.munn@adelaide.edu.au
                alex.brown@sahmri.com
                ngiareb@gmail.com
                Journal
                Global Health
                Global Health
                Globalization and Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1744-8603
                25 January 2018
                25 January 2018
                2018
                : 14
                : 12
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.430453.5, Wardliparingga Aboriginal Health Research Unit, , South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, ; Adelaide, South Australia Australia
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7304, GRID grid.1010.0, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, , The University of Adelaide, ; Adelaide, South Australia Australia
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7304, GRID grid.1010.0, Joanna Briggs Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, , The University of Adelaide, ; Adelaide, South Australia Australia
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0000 8994 5086, GRID grid.1026.5, Sansom Institute for Health Research, , University of South Australia, ; Adelaide, South Australia Australia
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0486 528X, GRID grid.1007.6, School of Education and School of Medicine, , University of Wollongong, ; Wollongong, NSW Australia
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6283-2350
                Article
                332
                10.1186/s12992-018-0332-2
                5784701
                29368657
                90762274-3361-4630-b76f-77a754d7f3ac
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 8 October 2017
                : 16 January 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000925, National Health and Medical Research Council;
                Award ID: NHMRC No 1061242
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Health & Social care
                primary health care,models of care,service delivery,indigenous,aboriginal and torres strait islander,american indian and alaska native

                Comments

                Comment on this article