14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Rb1 and Trp53 cooperate to suppress prostate cancer lineage plasticity, metastasis, and antiandrogen resistance

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Prostate cancer relapsing from antiandrogen therapies can exhibit variant histology with altered lineage marker expression, suggesting that lineage plasticity facilitates therapeutic resistance. The mechanisms underlying prostate cancer lineage plasticity are incompletely understood. Studying mouse models, we demonstrate that Rb1 loss facilitates lineage plasticity and metastasis of prostate adenocarcinoma initiated by Pten mutation. Additional loss of Trp53 causes resistance to antiandrogen therapy. Gene expression profiling indicates that mouse tumors resemble human prostate cancer neuroendocrine variants; both mouse and human tumors exhibit increased expression of epigenetic reprogramming factors such as Ezh2 and Sox2. Clinically relevant Ezh2 inhibitors restore androgen receptor expression and sensitivity to antiandrogen therapy. These findings uncover genetic mutations that enable prostate cancer progression; identify mouse models for studying prostate cancer lineage plasticity; and suggest an epigenetic approach for extending clinical responses to antiandrogen therapy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Suppression of induced pluripotent stem cell generation by the p53-p21 pathway.

          Induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells can be generated from somatic cells by the introduction of Oct3/4 (also known as Pou5f1), Sox2, Klf4 and c-Myc, in mouse and in human. The efficiency of this process, however, is low. Pluripotency can be induced without c-Myc, but with even lower efficiency. A p53 (also known as TP53 in humans and Trp53 in mice) short-interfering RNA (siRNA) was recently shown to promote human iPS cell generation, but the specificity and mechanisms remain to be determined. Here we report that up to 10% of transduced mouse embryonic fibroblasts lacking p53 became iPS cells, even without the Myc retrovirus. The p53 deletion also promoted the induction of integration-free mouse iPS cells with plasmid transfection. Furthermore, in the p53-null background, iPS cells were generated from terminally differentiated T lymphocytes. The suppression of p53 also increased the efficiency of human iPS cell generation. DNA microarray analyses identified 34 p53-regulated genes that are common in mouse and human fibroblasts. Functional analyses of these genes demonstrate that the p53-p21 pathway serves as a barrier not only in tumorigenicity, but also in iPS cell generation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Prostate-specific deletion of the murine Pten tumor suppressor gene leads to metastatic prostate cancer.

            The murine Pten prostate cancer model described in this study recapitulates the disease progression seen in humans: initiation of prostate cancer with prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), followed by progression to invasive adenocarcinoma, and subsequent metastasis with defined kinetics. Furthermore, while Pten null prostate cancers regress after androgen ablation, they are capable of proliferating in the absence of androgen. Global assessment of molecular changes caused by homozygous Pten deletion identified key genes known to be relevant to human prostate cancer, including those "signature" genes associated with human cancer metastasis. This murine prostate cancer model provides a unique tool for both exploring the molecular mechanism underlying prostate cancer and for development of new targeted therapies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Aggressive variants of castration-resistant prostate cancer.

              A subset of patients with advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer may eventually evolve into an androgen receptor (AR)-independent phenotype, with a clinical picture associated with the development of rapidly progressive disease involving visceral sites and hormone refractoriness, often in the setting of a low or modestly rising serum prostate-specific antigen level. Biopsies performed in such patients may vary, ranging from poorly differentiated carcinomas to mixed adenocarcinoma-small cell carcinomas to pure small cell carcinomas. These aggressive tumors often demonstrate low or absent AR protein expression and, in some cases, express markers of neuroendocrine differentiation. Because tumor morphology is not always predicted by clinical behavior, the terms "anaplastic prostate cancer" or "neuroendocrine prostate cancer" have been used descriptively to describe these rapidly growing clinical features. Patients meeting clinical criteria of anaplastic prostate cancer have been shown to predict for poor prognosis, and these patients may be considered for platinum-based chemotherapy treatment regimens. Therefore, understanding variants within the spectrum of advanced prostate cancer has important diagnostic and treatment implications. ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                0404511
                7473
                Science
                Science
                Science (New York, N.Y.)
                0036-8075
                1095-9203
                16 February 2017
                06 January 2017
                06 January 2018
                : 355
                : 6320
                : 78-83
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute (RPCI), Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
                [2 ]Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), New York, NY 10065, USA
                [3 ]Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA
                [4 ]Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA
                [5 ]Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, RPCI, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
                [6 ]Department of Pathology, RPCI, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
                [7 ]Department of Medical Oncology, Center for Molecular Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA 02115, USA
                [8 ]Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA 02115, USA
                [9 ]Division of Cancer Studies, King’s College London, London SE1 9RT, UK
                [10 ]Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD 20815, USA
                Author notes
                [*]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                Article
                PMC5367887 PMC5367887 5367887 nihpa852446
                10.1126/science.aah4199
                5367887
                28059767
                90c7f48a-33c4-4af4-b24b-aab8e160a0dc
                History
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article