2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Psychometric properties of the embodiment scale for the rubber hand illusion and its relation with individual differences

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Rubber Hand Illusion (RHI) opened the investigation of the sense of body ownership in healthy people. By putting in slight contrast vision touch and proprioception, healthy people embody a fake hand in one's body representation. The easiness of the procedure, typically measured with a set of questions that capture the subjective experience, favoured its blooming. However, validation studies of embodiment questionnaires are lacking, and the individual differences that contribute to the embodiment received little attention. In our study, 298 participants underwent an RHI procedure following both synchronous and asynchronous (control) visuo-tactile stimulations. The study had multiple aims: (a) to explore the psychometric structure of a 27-items questionnaire largely used in the literature; (b) to build a psychometrically efficient scale to measure embodiment-related phenomena; (c) to explore whether and how individual differences (empathy, self-esteem and mindfulness) are associated with the experience of illusion. We found a relatively simple structure consisting of three components: embodiment of the rubber hand, disembodiment of the biological hand, physical sensations experienced during the procedure. The scales designed were psychometrically reliable and theoretically meaningful, encompassing 18 of the original items. Finally, by adopting a network analysis approach, we found that the embodiment is directly related to empathy and self-esteem, while disembodiment and physical sensation are unrelated to individual personality traits. The study provides substantial evidence to use the embodiment scale as a standard questionnaire for future RHI studies. Additionally, the correlations with personality traits suggest that the embodiment induced by the RHI deeply integrates with the complexity of the individuals and their differences.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Adaptive Lasso and Its Oracle Properties

          Hui Zou (2006)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper

              The usage of psychological networks that conceptualize behavior as a complex interplay of psychological and other components has gained increasing popularity in various research fields. While prior publications have tackled the topics of estimating and interpreting such networks, little work has been conducted to check how accurate (i.e., prone to sampling variation) networks are estimated, and how stable (i.e., interpretation remains similar with less observations) inferences from the network structure (such as centrality indices) are. In this tutorial paper, we aim to introduce the reader to this field and tackle the problem of accuracy under sampling variation. We first introduce the current state-of-the-art of network estimation. Second, we provide a rationale why researchers should investigate the accuracy of psychological networks. Third, we describe how bootstrap routines can be used to (A) assess the accuracy of estimated network connections, (B) investigate the stability of centrality indices, and (C) test whether network connections and centrality estimates for different variables differ from each other. We introduce two novel statistical methods: for (B) the correlation stability coefficient, and for (C) the bootstrapped difference test for edge-weights and centrality indices. We conducted and present simulation studies to assess the performance of both methods. Finally, we developed the free R-package bootnet that allows for estimating psychological networks in a generalized framework in addition to the proposed bootstrap methods. We showcase bootnet in a tutorial, accompanied by R syntax, in which we analyze a dataset of 359 women with posttraumatic stress disorder available online. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                daniele.romano@unimib.it
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                3 March 2021
                3 March 2021
                2021
                : 11
                : 5029
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.7563.7, ISNI 0000 0001 2174 1754, Psychology Department, , University of Milano-Bicocca, ; piazza dell’Ateneo Nuovo, 1, 20126 Milan, Italy
                [2 ]GRID grid.7563.7, ISNI 0000 0001 2174 1754, Mind and Behavior Technological Center (MIBTEC), , University of Milano-Bicocca, ; Milan, Italy
                [3 ]GRID grid.9906.6, ISNI 0000 0001 2289 7785, Department of History, Society and Human Studies, , University of Salento, ; Milan, Italy
                Article
                84595
                10.1038/s41598-021-84595-x
                7930179
                33658576
                91056c60-fd45-49aa-94f3-0c62834e1973
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 8 October 2020
                : 8 February 2021
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Uncategorized
                psychology,human behaviour,perception
                Uncategorized
                psychology, human behaviour, perception

                Comments

                Comment on this article