38
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      MK2 Phosphorylates RIPK1 to Prevent TNF-Induced Cell Death

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          TNF is an inflammatory cytokine that upon binding to its receptor, TNFR1, can drive cytokine production, cell survival, or cell death. TNFR1 stimulation causes activation of NF-κB, p38α, and its downstream effector kinase MK2, thereby promoting transcription, mRNA stabilization, and translation of target genes. Here we show that TNF-induced activation of MK2 results in global RIPK1 phosphorylation. MK2 directly phosphorylates RIPK1 at residue S321, which inhibits its ability to bind FADD/caspase-8 and induce RIPK1-kinase-dependent apoptosis and necroptosis. Consistently, a phospho-mimetic S321D RIPK1 mutation limits TNF-induced death. Mechanistically, we find that phosphorylation of S321 inhibits RIPK1 kinase activation. We further show that cytosolic RIPK1 contributes to complex-II-mediated cell death, independent of its recruitment to complex-I, suggesting that complex-II originates from both RIPK1 in complex-I and cytosolic RIPK1. Thus, MK2-mediated phosphorylation of RIPK1 serves as a checkpoint within the TNF signaling pathway that integrates cell survival and cytokine production.

          Graphical Abstract

          Highlights

          • Phosphorylation of RIPK1 by MK2 acts as survival checkpoint in TNF signaling

          • TNF-induced activation of MK2 results in global RIPK1 phosphorylation

          • MK2-mediated phosphorylation suppresses RIPK1 kinase activation and cell death

          • Complex-II originates from RIPK1 in complex-I as well as cytosolic RIPK1

          Abstract

          Jaco et al. show that MK2 directly phosphorylates RIPK1 at residue S321, suppressing the cytotoxic potential of RIPK1 and acting as a checkpoint within the TNF signaling pathway.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Induction of TNF receptor I-mediated apoptosis via two sequential signaling complexes.

          Apoptosis induced by TNF-receptor I (TNFR1) is thought to proceed via recruitment of the adaptor FADD and caspase-8 to the receptor complex. TNFR1 signaling is also known to activate the transcription factor NF-kappa B and promote survival. The mechanism by which this decision between cell death and survival is arbitrated is not clear. We report that TNFR1-induced apoptosis involves two sequential signaling complexes. The initial plasma membrane bound complex (complex I) consists of TNFR1, the adaptor TRADD, the kinase RIP1, and TRAF2 and rapidly signals activation of NF-kappa B. In a second step, TRADD and RIP1 associate with FADD and caspase-8, forming a cytoplasmic complex (complex II). When NF-kappa B is activated by complex I, complex II harbors the caspase-8 inhibitor FLIP(L) and the cell survives. Thus, TNFR1-mediated-signal transduction includes a checkpoint, resulting in cell death (via complex II) in instances where the initial signal (via complex I, NF-kappa B) fails to be activated.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            IAP antagonists induce autoubiquitination of c-IAPs, NF-kappaB activation, and TNFalpha-dependent apoptosis.

            Inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) proteins are antiapoptotic regulators that block cell death in response to diverse stimuli. They are expressed at elevated levels in human malignancies and are attractive targets for the development of novel cancer therapeutics. Herein, we demonstrate that small-molecule IAP antagonists bind to select baculovirus IAP repeat (BIR) domains resulting in dramatic induction of auto-ubiquitination activity and rapid proteasomal degradation of c-IAPs. The IAP antagonists also induce cell death that is dependent on TNF signaling and de novo protein biosynthesis. Additionally, the c-IAP proteins were found to function as regulators of NF-kappaB signaling. Through their ubiquitin E3 ligase activities c-IAP1 and c-IAP2 promote proteasomal degradation of NIK, the central ser/thr kinase in the noncanonical NF-kappaB pathway.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              IAP antagonists target cIAP1 to induce TNFalpha-dependent apoptosis.

              XIAP prevents apoptosis by binding to and inhibiting caspases, and this inhibition can be relieved by IAP antagonists, such as Smac/DIABLO. IAP antagonist compounds (IACs) have therefore been designed to inhibit XIAP to kill tumor cells. Because XIAP inhibits postmitochondrial caspases, caspase 8 inhibitors should not block killing by IACs. Instead, we show that apoptosis caused by an IAC is blocked by the caspase 8 inhibitor crmA and that IAP antagonists activate NF-kappaB signaling via inhibtion of cIAP1. In sensitive tumor lines, IAP antagonist induced NF-kappaB-stimulated production of TNFalpha that killed cells in an autocrine fashion. Inhibition of NF-kappaB reduced TNFalpha production, and blocking NF-kappaB activation or TNFalpha allowed tumor cells to survive IAC-induced apoptosis. Cells treated with an IAC, or those in which cIAP1 was deleted, became sensitive to apoptosis induced by exogenous TNFalpha, suggesting novel uses of these compounds in treating cancer.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Mol Cell
                Mol. Cell
                Molecular Cell
                Cell Press
                1097-2765
                1097-4164
                01 June 2017
                01 June 2017
                : 66
                : 5
                : 698-710.e5
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, Mary-Jean Mitchell Green Building, Chester Beatty Laboratories, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, UK
                [2 ]Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
                [3 ]Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia
                [4 ]Institute for Genetics, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany
                [5 ]Centre for Molecular Medicine (CMMC), University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany
                [6 ]Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author pasparakis@ 123456uni-koeln.de
                [∗∗ ]Corresponding author silke@ 123456wehi.edu.au
                [∗∗∗ ]Corresponding author pmeier@ 123456icr.ac.uk
                [7]

                These authors contributed equally

                [8]

                Senior author

                [9]

                Lead Contact

                Article
                S1097-2765(17)30316-7
                10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.003
                5459754
                28506461
                911c635a-f403-4693-b6ae-13d3583a78f5
                © 2017 The Author(s)

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 27 February 2017
                : 17 April 2017
                : 3 May 2017
                Categories
                Article

                Molecular biology
                tnf,ripk1,p38,mk2,cell death,caspase-8,necroptosis,iaps,cytokine,complex-ii
                Molecular biology
                tnf, ripk1, p38, mk2, cell death, caspase-8, necroptosis, iaps, cytokine, complex-ii

                Comments

                Comment on this article