36
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs), which deliver mental health support via technologies such as mobile apps, can increase access to mental health support, and many studies have demonstrated their effectiveness in improving symptoms. However, user engagement varies, with regard to a user’s uptake and sustained interactions with these interventions.

          Objective

          This systematic review aims to identify common barriers and facilitators that influence user engagement with DMHIs.

          Methods

          A systematic search was conducted in the SCOPUS, PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Empirical studies that report qualitative and/or quantitative data were included.

          Results

          A total of 208 articles met the inclusion criteria. The included articles used a variety of methodologies, including interviews, surveys, focus groups, workshops, field studies, and analysis of user reviews. Factors extracted for coding were related to the end user, the program or content offered by the intervention, and the technology and implementation environment. Common barriers included severe mental health issues that hampered engagement, technical issues, and a lack of personalization. Common facilitators were social connectedness facilitated by the intervention, increased insight into health, and a feeling of being in control of one’s own health.

          Conclusions

          Although previous research suggests that DMHIs can be useful in supporting mental health, contextual factors are important determinants of whether users actually engage with these interventions. The factors identified in this review can provide guidance when evaluating DMHIs to help explain and understand user engagement and can inform the design and development of new digital interventions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references244

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Perceived barriers and facilitators to mental health help-seeking in young people: a systematic review

              Background Adolescents and young adults frequently experience mental disorders, yet tend not to seek help. This systematic review aims to summarise reported barriers and facilitators of help-seeking in young people using both qualitative research from surveys, focus groups, and interviews and quantitative data from published surveys. It extends previous reviews through its systematic research methodology and by the inclusion of published studies describing what young people themselves perceive are the barriers and facilitators to help-seeking for common mental health problems. Methods Twenty two published studies of perceived barriers or facilitators in adolescents or young adults were identified through searches of PubMed, PsycInfo, and the Cochrane database. A thematic analysis was undertaken on the results reported in the qualitative literature and quantitative literature. Results Fifteen qualitative and seven quantitative studies were identified. Young people perceived stigma and embarrassment, problems recognising symptoms (poor mental health literacy), and a preference for self-reliance as the most important barriers to help-seeking. Facilitators were comparatively under-researched. However, there was evidence that young people perceived positive past experiences, and social support and encouragement from others as aids to the help-seeking process. Conclusions Strategies for improving help-seeking by adolescents and young adults should focus on improving mental health literacy, reducing stigma, and taking into account the desire of young people for self-reliance.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Med Internet Res
                J Med Internet Res
                JMIR
                Journal of Medical Internet Research
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                1439-4456
                1438-8871
                March 2021
                24 March 2021
                : 23
                : 3
                : e24387
                Affiliations
                [1 ] University of California Irvine Irvine, CA United States
                [2 ] University of California San Diego San Diego, CA United States
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Judith Borghouts jborghou@ 123456uci.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9716-0147
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3099-8081
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2492-2424
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6059-8388
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1003-0399
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8314-0732
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6520-2920
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4121-4948
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4147-5785
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0742-9240
                Article
                v23i3e24387
                10.2196/24387
                8074985
                33759801
                9127f273-a1a2-422c-b08c-88142b6b6e66
                ©Judith Borghouts, Elizabeth Eikey, Gloria Mark, Cinthia De Leon, Stephen M Schueller, Margaret Schneider, Nicole Stadnick, Kai Zheng, Dana Mukamel, Dara H Sorkin. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 24.03.2021.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 18 September 2020
                : 7 November 2020
                : 24 December 2020
                : 8 February 2021
                Categories
                Review
                Review

                Medicine
                mhealth,ehealth,mental health,depression,anxiety,behavior,mobile phone
                Medicine
                mhealth, ehealth, mental health, depression, anxiety, behavior, mobile phone

                Comments

                Comment on this article