7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of head pitch and roll orientations on magnetically induced vertigo

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Key points

          • Lying supine in a strong magnetic field, such as in magnetic resonance imaging scanners, can induce a perception of whole‐body rotation.

          • The leading hypothesis to explain this invokes a Lorentz force mechanism acting on vestibular endolymph that acts to stimulate semicircular canals.

          • The hypothesis predicts that the perception of whole‐body rotation will depend on head orientation in the field.

          • Results showed that the direction and magnitude of apparent whole‐body rotation while stationary in a 7 T magnetic field is influenced by head orientation.

          • The data are compatible with the Lorentz force hypothesis of magnetic vestibular stimulation and furthermore demonstrate the operation of a spatial transformation process from head‐referenced vestibular signals to Earth‐referenced body motion.

          Abstract

          High strength static magnetic fields are known to induce vertigo, believed to be via stimulation of the vestibular system. The leading hypothesis (Lorentz forces) predicts that the induced vertigo should depend on the orientation of the magnetic field relative to the head. In this study we examined the effect of static head pitch (−80 to +40 deg; 12 participants) and roll (−40 to +40 deg; 11 participants) on qualitative and quantitative aspects of vertigo experienced in the dark by healthy humans when exposed to the static uniform magnetic field inside a 7 T MRI scanner. Three participants were additionally examined at 180 deg pitch and roll orientations. The effect of roll orientation on horizontal and vertical nystagmus was also measured and was found to affect only the vertical component. Vertigo was most discomforting when head pitch was around 60 deg extension and was mildest when it was around 20 deg flexion. Quantitative analysis of vertigo focused on the induced perception of horizontal‐plane rotation reported online with the aid of hand‐held switches. Head orientation had effects on both the magnitude and the direction of this perceived rotation. The data suggest sinusoidal relationships between head orientation and perception with spatial periods of 180 deg for pitch and 360 deg for roll, which we explain is consistent with the Lorentz force hypothesis. The effects of head pitch on vertigo and previously reported nystagmus are consistent with both effects being driven by a common vestibular signal. To explain all the observed effects, this common signal requires contributions from multiple semicircular canals.

          Key points

          • Lying supine in a strong magnetic field, such as in magnetic resonance imaging scanners, can induce a perception of whole‐body rotation.

          • The leading hypothesis to explain this invokes a Lorentz force mechanism acting on vestibular endolymph that acts to stimulate semicircular canals.

          • The hypothesis predicts that the perception of whole‐body rotation will depend on head orientation in the field.

          • Results showed that the direction and magnitude of apparent whole‐body rotation while stationary in a 7 T magnetic field is influenced by head orientation.

          • The data are compatible with the Lorentz force hypothesis of magnetic vestibular stimulation and furthermore demonstrate the operation of a spatial transformation process from head‐referenced vestibular signals to Earth‐referenced body motion.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          MRI magnetic field stimulates rotational sensors of the brain.

          Vertigo in and around magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) machines has been noted for years [1, 2]. Several mechanisms have been suggested to explain these sensations [3, 4], yet without direct, objective measures, the cause is unknown. We found that all of our healthy human subjects developed a robust nystagmus while simply lying in the static magnetic field of an MRI machine. Patients lacking labyrinthine function did not. We use the pattern of eye movements as a measure of vestibular stimulation to show that the stimulation is static (continuous, proportional to static magnetic field strength, requiring neither head movement nor dynamic change in magnetic field strength) and directional (sensitive to magnetic field polarity and head orientation). Our calculations and geometric model suggest that magnetic vestibular stimulation (MVS) derives from a Lorentz force resulting from interaction between the magnetic field and naturally occurring ionic currents in the labyrinthine endolymph fluid. This force pushes on the semicircular canal cupula, leading to nystagmus. We emphasize that the unique, dual role of endolymph in the delivery of both ionic current and fluid pressure, coupled with the cupula's function as a pressure sensor, makes magnetic-field-induced nystagmus and vertigo possible. Such effects could confound functional MRI studies of brain behavior, including resting-state brain activity. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Magnetic-field-induced vertigo: a theoretical and experimental investigation.

            Vertigo-like sensations or apparent perception of movement are reported by some subjects and operators in and around high field whole body magnetic resonance body scanners. Induced currents (which modulate the firing rate of the vestibular hair cell), magneto-hydrodynamics (MDH), and tissue magnetic susceptibility differences have all been proposed as possible mechanisms for this effect. In this article, we examine the theory underlying each of these mechanisms and explore resulting predictions. Experimental evidence is summarised in the following findings: 30% of subjects display a postural sway response at a field-gradient product of 1 T(2)m(-1); a determining factor for experience of vertigo is the total unipolar integrated field change over a period greater than 1 s; the perception of dizziness is not necessarily related to a high value of the rate of change of magnetic field; eight of ten subjects reported sensations ranging from mild to severe when exposed to a magnetic field change of the order of 4.7 T in 1.9 s; no subjects reported any response when exposed to 50 ms pulses of dB/dt of 2 Ts(-1) amplitude. The experimental evidence supports the hypothesis that magnetic-field related vertigo results from both magnetic susceptibility differences between vestibular organs and surrounding fluid, and induced currents acting on the vestibular hair cells. Both mechanisms are consistent with theoretical predictions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The multisensory physiological and pathological vertigo syndromes.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Physiol
                J. Physiol. (Lond.)
                10.1111/(ISSN)1469-7793
                TJP
                jphysiol
                The Journal of Physiology
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0022-3751
                1469-7793
                30 December 2015
                15 February 2016
                : 594
                : 4 ( doiID: 10.1113/tjp.2016.594.issue-4 )
                : 1051-1067
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of NeurologyUniversity College London LondonUK
                [ 2 ] Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging CentreUniversity of Nottingham NottinghamUK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Corresponding author O. Mian: School of Applied Sciences, London South Bank University, 103 Borough Road, London SE1 0AA, UK. Email: miano@ 123456lsbu.ac.uk
                [†]

                Post‐experimental work leading to this paper was undertaken by Omar S. Mian at the School of Applied Sciences, London South Bank University, UK, and by Andre Antunes at High‐field Magnetic Resonance, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany.

                Article
                TJP6996
                10.1113/JP271513
                4753258
                26614577
                91335d76-b972-41e7-b2cb-b8293ce3d46b
                © 2015 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Physiological Society

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 08 September 2015
                : 19 November 2015
                Page count
                Pages: 17
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive and Behavioural Neuroscience
                Research Paper
                Neuroscience–Behavioural/Systems/Cognitive
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                tjp6996
                15 February 2016
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:4.9.4 mode:remove_FC converted:31.08.2016

                Human biology
                Human biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article