61
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Biological Effects and Safety in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Review

      International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
      Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
      mri safety, magnetic resonance imaging, genotoxic effects, electromagnetic fields

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Since the introduction of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) as a diagnostic technique, the number of people exposed to electromagnetic fields (EMF) has increased dramatically. In this review, based on the results of a pioneer study showing in vitro and in vivo genotoxic effects of MRI scans, we report an updated survey about the effects of non-ionizing EMF employed in MRI, relevant for patients’ and workers’ safety. While the whole data does not confirm a risk hypothesis, it suggests a need for further studies and prudent use in order to avoid unnecessary examinations, according to the precautionary principle.

          Related collections

          Most cited references68

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Guidelines on limits of exposure to static magnetic fields.

          (2009)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Mechanism of action of moderate-intensity static magnetic fields on biological systems.

            There is substantial evidence indicating that moderate-intensity static magnetic fields (SMF) are capable of influencing a number of biological systems, particularly those whose function is closely linked to the properties of membrane channels. Most of the reported moderate SMF effects may be explained on the basis of alterations in membrane calcium ion flux. The mechanism suggested to explain these effects is based on the diamagnetic anisitropic properties of membrane phospholipids. It is proposed that reorientation of these molecules during moderate SMF exposure will result in the deformation of imbedded ion channels, thereby altering their activation kinetics. Channel inactivation would not be expected to be influenced by these fields because this mechanism is not located within the intramembraneous portion of the channel. Patch-clamp studies of calcium channels have provided support for this hypothesis, as well as demonstrating a temperature dependency that is understandable on the basis of the membrane thermotropic phase transition. Additional studies have demonstrated that sodium channels are similarly affected by SMFs, although to a lesser degree. These findings support the view that moderate SMF effects on biological membranes represent a general phenomenon, with some channels being more susceptible than others to membrane deformation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Non-thermal DNA breakage by mobile-phone radiation (1800 MHz) in human fibroblasts and in transformed GFSH-R17 rat granulosa cells in vitro.

              Cultured human diploid fibroblasts and cultured rat granulosa cells were exposed to intermittent and continuous radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) used in mobile phones, with different specific absorption rates (SAR) and different mobile-phone modulations. DNA strand breaks were determined by means of the alkaline and neutral comet assay. RF-EMF exposure (1800 MHz; SAR 1.2 or 2 W/kg; different modulations; during 4, 16 and 24h; intermittent 5 min on/10 min off or continuous wave) induced DNA single- and double-strand breaks. Effects occurred after 16 h exposure in both cell types and after different mobile-phone modulations. The intermittent exposure showed a stronger effect in the comet assay than continuous exposure. Therefore we conclude that the induced DNA damage cannot be based on thermal effects.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                101238455
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                June 2009
                10 June 2009
                : 6
                : 6
                : 1778-1798
                Affiliations
                [1 ] ITENI Laboratory, CNR Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa, Italy; E-Mails: valeh@ 123456ifc.cnr.it (V.H.); giovannetti@ 123456ifc.cnr.it (G.G.)
                [2 ] Department of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, Italy; E-Mail: nicvanel@ 123456ifc.cnr.it
                [3 ] MRI Laboratory, G. Monasterio Foundation and CNR Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa, Italy; E-Mail: lomass@ 123456ifc.cnr.it
                [4 ] Cell Biology and Cytogenetics Unit, CNR Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa, Italy
                Author notes
                [* ]Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mails: llandini@ 123456ifc.cnr.it (L.L.); s.simi@ 123456ifc.cnr.it (S.S.); Tel.: +39 050 3152779, +39 050 3152615; Fax: +39 050 315 2166
                Article
                ijerph-06-01778
                10.3390/ijerph6061778
                2705217
                19578460
                9154a320-57ff-45e7-8bf9-dfecf48a53f8
                © 2009 by the authors; licensee Molecular Diversity Preservation International, Basel, Switzerland.

                This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).

                History
                : 4 May 2009
                : 5 June 2009
                Categories
                Review

                Public health
                mri safety,magnetic resonance imaging,genotoxic effects,electromagnetic fields
                Public health
                mri safety, magnetic resonance imaging, genotoxic effects, electromagnetic fields

                Comments

                Comment on this article