15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      RF Path and Absorption Loss Estimation for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks in Different Water Environments

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Underwater Wireless Sensor Network (UWSN) communication at high frequencies is extremely challenging. The intricacies presented by the underwater environment are far more compared to the terrestrial environment. The prime reason for such intricacies are the physical characteristics of the underwater environment that have a big impact on electromagnetic (EM) signals. Acoustics signals are by far the most preferred choice for underwater wireless communication. Because high frequency signals have the luxury of large bandwidth (BW) at shorter distances, high frequency EM signals cannot penetrate and propagate deep in underwater environments. The EM properties of water tend to resist their propagation and cause severe attenuation. Accordingly, there are two questions that need to be addressed for underwater environment, first what happens when high frequency EM signals operating at 2.4 GHz are used for communication, and second which factors affect the most to high frequency EM signals. To answer these questions, we present real-time experiments conducted at 2.4 GHz in terrestrial and underwater (fresh water) environments. The obtained results helped in studying the physical characteristics ( i.e., EM properties, propagation and absorption loss) of underwater environments. It is observed that high frequency EM signals can propagate in fresh water at a shallow depth only and can be considered for a specific class of applications such as water sports. Furthermore, path loss, velocity of propagation, absorption loss and the rate of signal loss in different underwater environments are also calculated and presented in order to understand why EM signals cannot propagate in sea water and oceanic water environments. An optimal solk6ution for underwater communication in terms of coverage distance, bandwidth and nature of communication is presented, along with possible underwater applications of UWSNs at 2.4 GHz.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Wireless communications—principles and practice

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            On the relationship between capacity and distance in an underwater acoustic communication channel

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Underwater Sensor Network Applications: A Comprehensive Survey

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Sensors (Basel)
                Sensors (Basel)
                sensors
                Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
                MDPI
                1424-8220
                16 June 2016
                June 2016
                : 16
                : 6
                : 890
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, 852, Hong Kong, China; zaziz3-c@ 123456my.cityu.edu.hk
                [2 ]Department of Telecommunication, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro 76062, Pakistan; faisal.shaikh@ 123456faculty.muet.edu.pk (F.K.S.); SyedMZ@ 123456cs.cardiff.ac.uk (S.M.Z.S.S.)
                [3 ]School of Computer Science & Informatics, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3XQ, UK
                [4 ]Science and Technology Unit, Umm Al Qura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia; aasheikh@ 123456uqu.edu.sa
                [5 ]Department of Computer Engineering, Umm Al Qura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia; eafelemban@ 123456uqu.edu.sa
                [6 ]CoNNekT Lab, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan; saad.qaisar@ 123456seecs.edu.pk
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: umair.qureshi@ 123456faculty.muet.edu.pk ; Tel.: +92-22-277-2277
                Article
                sensors-16-00890
                10.3390/s16060890
                4934316
                27322263
                917d4120-dcce-47af-8d6e-95478379ead9
                © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

                This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 13 February 2016
                : 09 June 2016
                Categories
                Article

                Biomedical engineering
                uwsns,sensors,underwater,water conductivity,water permeability,water permittivity,freshwater,seawater

                Comments

                Comment on this article