180
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Fumarates improve psoriasis and multiple sclerosis by inducing type II dendritic cells

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Fumarates suppress Th1 responses by blocking IL-12 and IL-23 production by dendritic cells via distinct pathways.

          Abstract

          Fumarates improve multiple sclerosis (MS) and psoriasis, two diseases in which both IL-12 and IL-23 promote pathogenic T helper (Th) cell differentiation. However, both diseases show opposing responses to most established therapies. First, we show in humans that fumarate treatment induces IL-4–producing Th2 cells in vivo and generates type II dendritic cells (DCs) that produce IL-10 instead of IL-12 and IL-23. In mice, fumarates also generate type II DCs that induce IL-4–producing Th2 cells in vitro and in vivo and protect mice from experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Type II DCs result from fumarate-induced glutathione (GSH) depletion, followed by increased hemoxygenase-1 (HO-1) expression and impaired STAT1 phosphorylation. Induced HO-1 is cleaved, whereupon the N-terminal fragment of HO-1 translocates into the nucleus and interacts with AP-1 and NF-κB sites of the IL-23p19 promoter. This interaction prevents IL-23p19 transcription without affecting IL-12p35, whereas STAT1 inactivation prevents IL-12p35 transcription without affecting IL-23p19. As a consequence, GSH depletion by small molecules such as fumarates induces type II DCs in mice and in humans that ameliorate inflammatory autoimmune diseases. This therapeutic approach improves Th1- and Th17-mediated autoimmune diseases such as psoriasis and MS by interfering with IL-12 and IL-23 production.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Differential antigen processing by dendritic cell subsets in vivo.

          Dendritic cells (DCs) process and present self and foreign antigens to induce tolerance or immunity. In vitro models suggest that induction of immunity is controlled by regulating the presentation of antigen, but little is known about how DCs control antigen presentation in vivo. To examine antigen processing and presentation in vivo, we specifically targeted antigens to two major subsets of DCs by using chimeric monoclonal antibodies. Unlike CD8+ DCs that express the cell surface protein CD205, CD8- DCs, which are positive for the 33D1 antigen, are specialized for presentation on major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II. This difference in antigen processing is intrinsic to the DC subsets and is associated with increased expression of proteins involved in MHC processing.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Multiple sclerosis--the plaque and its pathogenesis.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Dendritic-cell control of pathogen-driven T-cell polarization.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Exp Med
                J. Exp. Med
                jem
                The Journal of Experimental Medicine
                The Rockefeller University Press
                0022-1007
                1540-9538
                24 October 2011
                : 208
                : 11
                : 2291-2303
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center and [2 ]Interfaculty Institute for Biochemistry, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
                [3 ]Department of Neurology and Neurotherapeutics and [4 ]Center for Immunology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390
                [5 ]Department of Neurology, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210
                [6 ]Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, 80337 Munich, Germany
                [7 ]Center for Biomolecular Interactions Bremen, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany
                Author notes
                CORRESPONDENCE Martin Röcken: mrocken@ 123456med.uni-tuebingen.de OR Michael K. Racke: Michael.Racke@ 123456osumc.edu

                K. Ghoreschi, J. Brück, C. Kellerer, and C. Deng contributed equally to this paper.

                Article
                20100977
                10.1084/jem.20100977
                3201195
                21987655
                918330e1-a375-49c6-94c7-588c616bcb9a
                © 2011 Ghoreschi et al.

                This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/).

                History
                : 17 May 2010
                : 7 September 2011
                Categories
                Article

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article